Opioid prescribing requirements to minimize unused medications after an emergency department visit for acute pain: a prospective cohort study.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Raoul Daoust, Jean Paquet, Marcel Émond, Massimiliano Iseppon, David Williamson, Justin W Yan, Jeffrey J Perry, Vérilibe Huard, Gilles Lavigne, Jacques Lee, Justine Lessard, Eddy Lang, Alexis Cournoyer
{"title":"Opioid prescribing requirements to minimize unused medications after an emergency department visit for acute pain: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Raoul Daoust, Jean Paquet, Marcel Émond, Massimiliano Iseppon, David Williamson, Justin W Yan, Jeffrey J Perry, Vérilibe Huard, Gilles Lavigne, Jacques Lee, Justine Lessard, Eddy Lang, Alexis Cournoyer","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.231640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unused opioid prescriptions can be a driver of opioid misuse. Our objective was to determine the optimal quantity of opioids to prescribe to patients with acute pain at emergency department discharge, in order to meet their analgesic needs while limiting the amount of unused opioids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective, multicentre cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged 18 years and older with an acute pain condition present for less than 2 weeks who were discharged from emergency department with an opioid prescription. Participants completed a pain medication diary for real-time recording of quantity, doses, and names of all analgesics consumed during a 14-day follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2240 participants, who had a mean age of 51 years; 48% were female. Over 14 days, participants consumed a median of 5 (quartiles, 1-14) morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents, with significant variation across pain conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Most opioid tablets prescribed (63%) were unused. To meet the opioid need of 80% of patients for 2 weeks, we found that those experiencing renal colic or abdominal pain required fewer opioid tablets (8 morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents) than patients who had fractures (24 tablets), back pain (21 tablets), neck pain (17 tablets), or other musculoskeletal pain (16 tablets).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Two-thirds of opioid tablets prescribed at emergency department discharge for acute pain were unused, whereas opioid requirements varied significantly based on the cause of acute pain. Smaller, cause-specific opioid prescriptions could provide adequate pain management while reducing the risk of opioid misuse.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03953534.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unused opioid prescriptions can be a driver of opioid misuse. Our objective was to determine the optimal quantity of opioids to prescribe to patients with acute pain at emergency department discharge, in order to meet their analgesic needs while limiting the amount of unused opioids.

Methods: In a prospective, multicentre cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged 18 years and older with an acute pain condition present for less than 2 weeks who were discharged from emergency department with an opioid prescription. Participants completed a pain medication diary for real-time recording of quantity, doses, and names of all analgesics consumed during a 14-day follow-up period.

Results: We included 2240 participants, who had a mean age of 51 years; 48% were female. Over 14 days, participants consumed a median of 5 (quartiles, 1-14) morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents, with significant variation across pain conditions (p < 0.001). Most opioid tablets prescribed (63%) were unused. To meet the opioid need of 80% of patients for 2 weeks, we found that those experiencing renal colic or abdominal pain required fewer opioid tablets (8 morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents) than patients who had fractures (24 tablets), back pain (21 tablets), neck pain (17 tablets), or other musculoskeletal pain (16 tablets).

Interpretation: Two-thirds of opioid tablets prescribed at emergency department discharge for acute pain were unused, whereas opioid requirements varied significantly based on the cause of acute pain. Smaller, cause-specific opioid prescriptions could provide adequate pain management while reducing the risk of opioid misuse.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03953534.

前瞻性队列研究:阿片类药物处方要求,以尽量减少急性疼痛急诊就诊后未使用的药物。
背景:未使用的阿片类药物处方可能会导致阿片类药物滥用。我们的目标是确定急性疼痛患者在急诊科出院时阿片类药物的最佳处方量,以满足其镇痛需求,同时限制未使用阿片类药物的数量:在一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中,我们连续纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、急性疼痛病程不超过两周、急诊科出院时开具阿片类药物处方的患者。参与者填写了疼痛用药日记,以实时记录 14 天随访期间所有镇痛药的用量、剂量和名称:我们共纳入了 2240 名参与者,他们的平均年龄为 51 岁,其中 48% 为女性。在 14 天内,参与者消耗的吗啡中位数为 5(四分位数,1-14)片吗啡 5 毫克当量,不同疼痛情况下的消耗量差异显著(p < 0.001)。大部分处方阿片(63%)未被使用。我们发现,为满足80%患者2周的阿片类药物需求,肾绞痛或腹痛患者所需的阿片类药物片剂(8片吗啡5毫克片剂当量)少于骨折患者(24片)、背痛患者(21片)、颈部疼痛患者(17片)或其他肌肉骨骼疼痛患者(16片):急诊科出院时因急性疼痛开出的阿片类药物中有三分之二未被使用,而根据急性疼痛的原因,阿片类药物的需求量有很大差异。针对具体病因开具较少的阿片类药物处方可提供充分的疼痛治疗,同时降低滥用阿片类药物的风险:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,no.试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,编号:NCT03953534。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信