{"title":"Corneal parameters in diabetics versus non-diabetics and correlation with various blood sugar parameters.","authors":"Shailaja Pandey, Archana Singh, Harikrishnan Vannadil, Mohini Agrawal","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare corneal parameters in diabetics versus age-group-matched non-diabetics; also, to correlate these parameters with the duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and severity levels of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Materials and methods:</b> A comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye-care center from January 2020 to December 2020. Two-hundred patients (400 eyes) with type-2 diabetes (100) and age-sex-matched non-diabetics (100) were included. Corneal morphological parameters like central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variance (CoV), hexagonality (6A), and average cell area were recorded by specular microscopy. These parameters were correlated with the duration of diabetes, severity of disease based upon fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, and grade of DR. Mean and standard deviation were calculated, and regular distribution of continuous data was tested using independent sample t-test and ANOVA. <b>Results:</b> Mean ECD (2447.32 ± 269.89/mm2), 6A (45.03 ± 6.71%), and IOP (15.47 ± 2.02 mmHg) changed in diabetic cases and were significantly low in diabetics, whereas, mean average cell area (413 ± 50.19 mm2), standard deviation (167.05 ± 77.91), CCT (525.81 ± 36.69) and CoV (39.84 ± 15.59%), were significantly high in diabetics. Mean CCT had insignificant variation. Subgroup analysis within diabetics showed a statistically significant reduction of ECD, cell count, and 6A with increased duration of diabetes, poor glycaemic control, and raised HbA1c. <b>Discussion:</b> The corneal endothelial analysis is vital in daily clinical practice and provides valuable evidence concerning the viability of corneal endothelium in various intraocular surgeries. Uncontrolled DM harms the cornea with 70% of diabetics resulting in complications like keratopathy. The study highlighted that the increased duration of diabetes raised HbA1c, and poor glycemic control negatively affected corneal morphology. Our study showed a definite reduction in ECD and 6A in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. <b>Conclusion:</b> A definite reduction in the corneal endothelial counts, cell density, and hexagonality was found in type-2 diabetics compared to non-diabetics. <b>Abbreviations:</b> DM = Diabetes Mellitus, CCT = central corneal thickness, ECC = endothelial cell counts, ECD = endothelial cell density, CoV = coefficient of variance, 6A = hexagonality, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, SD = Standard of deviation, IOP = Intraocular pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"68 2","pages":"128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To compare corneal parameters in diabetics versus age-group-matched non-diabetics; also, to correlate these parameters with the duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and severity levels of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Materials and methods: A comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye-care center from January 2020 to December 2020. Two-hundred patients (400 eyes) with type-2 diabetes (100) and age-sex-matched non-diabetics (100) were included. Corneal morphological parameters like central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variance (CoV), hexagonality (6A), and average cell area were recorded by specular microscopy. These parameters were correlated with the duration of diabetes, severity of disease based upon fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, and grade of DR. Mean and standard deviation were calculated, and regular distribution of continuous data was tested using independent sample t-test and ANOVA. Results: Mean ECD (2447.32 ± 269.89/mm2), 6A (45.03 ± 6.71%), and IOP (15.47 ± 2.02 mmHg) changed in diabetic cases and were significantly low in diabetics, whereas, mean average cell area (413 ± 50.19 mm2), standard deviation (167.05 ± 77.91), CCT (525.81 ± 36.69) and CoV (39.84 ± 15.59%), were significantly high in diabetics. Mean CCT had insignificant variation. Subgroup analysis within diabetics showed a statistically significant reduction of ECD, cell count, and 6A with increased duration of diabetes, poor glycaemic control, and raised HbA1c. Discussion: The corneal endothelial analysis is vital in daily clinical practice and provides valuable evidence concerning the viability of corneal endothelium in various intraocular surgeries. Uncontrolled DM harms the cornea with 70% of diabetics resulting in complications like keratopathy. The study highlighted that the increased duration of diabetes raised HbA1c, and poor glycemic control negatively affected corneal morphology. Our study showed a definite reduction in ECD and 6A in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. Conclusion: A definite reduction in the corneal endothelial counts, cell density, and hexagonality was found in type-2 diabetics compared to non-diabetics. Abbreviations: DM = Diabetes Mellitus, CCT = central corneal thickness, ECC = endothelial cell counts, ECD = endothelial cell density, CoV = coefficient of variance, 6A = hexagonality, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, SD = Standard of deviation, IOP = Intraocular pressure.