{"title":"Assessment of macrolide susceptibility of <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> isolated from public buildings' water systems in Turkiye.","authors":"Ahmet Aktas, Fatma Koksal Cakirlar","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><i>Legionella pneumophila</i> (Lp) is aerobic, non-spore forming Gram-negative bacteria, which is ubiquitous in freshwater habitats, such as rivers and hot springs, as well as colonizing artificial aquatic environments. The ability of Lp to grow intracellularly within pulmonary macrophages is a prerequisite for the development of infection. Therefore, macrolides can achieve appropriate therapeutic concentrations in eukaryotic cells, such as azithromycin. This study aimed to investigate the macrolides susceptibility of Lp.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-flash water samples (n=143) were collected from the public buildings (hospitals and hotels) water system in Istanbul. Colonies were confirmed as Lp ST1, ST2-14, and non-pneumophila Lp using latex agglutination kit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 Lp were detected in hospital (n=23) and hotel (n=7) water systems using latex agglutination. Regardless of serotype and excluding strains without zone formation (≥256 mg/L), the main MIC values of azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin were 0.61 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L), 0.47 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L) and 0.44 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L), respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 values for macrolides were 0.5 and 3 mg/L for azithromycin, respectively; 0.38 and 1 mg/L for erythromycin, respectively; and 0.5 and 1 mg/L for clarithromycin, respectively. We compared the MIC values of the strains for all antimicrobial agents tested without serotype discrimination. We did not find a significant difference between the MIC values of the antibiotics (p=0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the data obtained from our study do not fully reflect the breakpoints, further epidemiological studies are needed to standardize MIC values.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 3","pages":"214-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.70104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Legionella pneumophila (Lp) is aerobic, non-spore forming Gram-negative bacteria, which is ubiquitous in freshwater habitats, such as rivers and hot springs, as well as colonizing artificial aquatic environments. The ability of Lp to grow intracellularly within pulmonary macrophages is a prerequisite for the development of infection. Therefore, macrolides can achieve appropriate therapeutic concentrations in eukaryotic cells, such as azithromycin. This study aimed to investigate the macrolides susceptibility of Lp.
Methods: Pre-flash water samples (n=143) were collected from the public buildings (hospitals and hotels) water system in Istanbul. Colonies were confirmed as Lp ST1, ST2-14, and non-pneumophila Lp using latex agglutination kit.
Results: 30 Lp were detected in hospital (n=23) and hotel (n=7) water systems using latex agglutination. Regardless of serotype and excluding strains without zone formation (≥256 mg/L), the main MIC values of azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin were 0.61 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L), 0.47 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L) and 0.44 mg/L (range 0.047-1 mg/L), respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 values for macrolides were 0.5 and 3 mg/L for azithromycin, respectively; 0.38 and 1 mg/L for erythromycin, respectively; and 0.5 and 1 mg/L for clarithromycin, respectively. We compared the MIC values of the strains for all antimicrobial agents tested without serotype discrimination. We did not find a significant difference between the MIC values of the antibiotics (p=0.16).
Conclusion: Although the data obtained from our study do not fully reflect the breakpoints, further epidemiological studies are needed to standardize MIC values.