Solitude in old age: a scoping review of conceptualisations, associated factors and impacts.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jaime Oliveira, Sara Guerra, Liliana Sousa, Oscar Ribeiro
{"title":"Solitude in old age: a scoping review of conceptualisations, associated factors and impacts.","authors":"Jaime Oliveira, Sara Guerra, Liliana Sousa, Oscar Ribeiro","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2379408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to map the existing scientific research about solitude in older adults, focusing on its conceptualizations, associated factors, and impacts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, searching Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Academic Search Complete databases for publications from 1985 until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies were included. The main findings suggest a wide-ranging conceptualisation of solitude, with most studies (<i>n</i> = 16) adopting neutral definitions such as \"being alone, without communicating with others\"; and a subset of studies adopting definitions that alluded to \"positive solitude\" (as the choice of being with oneself, underscoring potential benefits). Individual characteristics were identified as key associated factors of solitude. Both positive impacts and negative impacts were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in conceptualisation and impacts likely stems from methodological and theoretical differences in approaching solitude. This underscores the need for additional research to establish a widely accepted conceptual framework. Such consensus could enhance the understanding of the conditions contributing to positive and negative impacts associated with solitude and inform targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2379408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to map the existing scientific research about solitude in older adults, focusing on its conceptualizations, associated factors, and impacts.

Method: A scoping review was conducted, searching Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Academic Search Complete databases for publications from 1985 until December 2023.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included. The main findings suggest a wide-ranging conceptualisation of solitude, with most studies (n = 16) adopting neutral definitions such as "being alone, without communicating with others"; and a subset of studies adopting definitions that alluded to "positive solitude" (as the choice of being with oneself, underscoring potential benefits). Individual characteristics were identified as key associated factors of solitude. Both positive impacts and negative impacts were reported.

Conclusion: The variability in conceptualisation and impacts likely stems from methodological and theoretical differences in approaching solitude. This underscores the need for additional research to establish a widely accepted conceptual framework. Such consensus could enhance the understanding of the conditions contributing to positive and negative impacts associated with solitude and inform targeted interventions.

老年孤独:对概念、相关因素和影响的范围审查。
研究目的本研究旨在对有关老年人独处的现有科学研究进行梳理,重点关注其概念、相关因素和影响:方法:对 Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed 和 Academic Search Complete 数据库中 1985 年至 2023 年 12 月期间的出版物进行了范围审查:结果:共纳入 24 项研究。主要研究结果表明,独处的概念范围很广,大多数研究(n = 16)采用了中性定义,如 "独处,不与他人交流";还有一部分研究采用了暗示 "积极独处"(选择与自己在一起,强调潜在的好处)的定义。个人特征被认为是与独处相关的关键因素。研究报告既有正面影响,也有负面影响:概念和影响方面的差异可能源于处理独处问题的方法和理论差异。这突出表明有必要开展更多的研究,以建立一个广为接受的概念框架。这种共识可以加深对造成与独处相关的积极和消极影响的条件的理解,并为有针对性的干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信