Public-private partnerships, boundary spanners and the boundary wall in the English National Health Service.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
James Duncan Alexander
{"title":"Public-private partnerships, boundary spanners and the boundary wall in the English National Health Service.","authors":"James Duncan Alexander","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The paper investigates English National Health Service (NHS) organisations partnering with private companies, a form commonly known as a Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Successive governments have promoted PPPs as a way of improving the delivery of health care, making the best of the different skills/experience which both sectors bring. However, the task of making these relationships work on the ground often falls to individual leaders/practitioners (\"boundary spanners\") whose role has been under-researched in this type of partnership.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The paper opted for a comparative three case study approach, including 13 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with employees representing middle and senior management involved in managing the partnerships. The data were complemented by documentary analysis, including minutes, descriptions of internal processes and press releases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The paper provides conceptual and empirical insights by creating a framework called the \"boundary wall\" that indicates the ways in which different elements of the boundaries between organisations influence the role and activities of boundary spanners (managers of the partnership).</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>This is an initial framework in an under-researched area, so will need further testing and application to other case study sites in future research.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The paper includes implications for both practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>While we know an increasing amount about the role of boundary spanners in public partnerships, the paper makes a unique contribution by exploring these concepts in the context of relationships between the public and private sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":"38 5","pages":"662-681"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The paper investigates English National Health Service (NHS) organisations partnering with private companies, a form commonly known as a Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Successive governments have promoted PPPs as a way of improving the delivery of health care, making the best of the different skills/experience which both sectors bring. However, the task of making these relationships work on the ground often falls to individual leaders/practitioners ("boundary spanners") whose role has been under-researched in this type of partnership.

Design/methodology/approach: The paper opted for a comparative three case study approach, including 13 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with employees representing middle and senior management involved in managing the partnerships. The data were complemented by documentary analysis, including minutes, descriptions of internal processes and press releases.

Findings: The paper provides conceptual and empirical insights by creating a framework called the "boundary wall" that indicates the ways in which different elements of the boundaries between organisations influence the role and activities of boundary spanners (managers of the partnership).

Research limitations/implications: This is an initial framework in an under-researched area, so will need further testing and application to other case study sites in future research.

Practical implications: The paper includes implications for both practice and policy.

Originality/value: While we know an increasing amount about the role of boundary spanners in public partnerships, the paper makes a unique contribution by exploring these concepts in the context of relationships between the public and private sectors.

英国国民健康服务中的公私合作伙伴关系、"边界破坏者 "和 "边界墙"。
目的:本文调查了英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)组织与私营公司合作的情况,这种形式通常被称为公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)。历届政府都将公私合作伙伴关系作为改善医疗服务的一种方式加以推广,以充分利用两个部门所带来的不同技能/经验。然而,使这些关系在实地发挥作用的任务往往落在个别领导者/实践者("边界跨越者")身上,而对他们在这种伙伴关系中的作用研究不足:本文选择了三个案例的比较研究方法,包括对参与管理伙伴关系的中高层管理人员进行 13 次半结构化访谈和问卷调查。文件分析对数据进行了补充,包括会议记录、内部流程描述和新闻稿:本文通过创建一个名为 "边界墙 "的框架,指出了组织间边界的不同要素如何影响边界跨越者(合作伙伴关系的管理者)的角色和活动,从而提供了概念和经验方面的见解:研究局限性/意义:这是一个研究不足领域的初步框架,因此需要进一步测试,并在今后的研究中应用到其他案例研究中:原创性/价值:原创性/价值:虽然我们对边界跨越者在公共合作关系中的作用有了越来越多的了解,但本文在公共和私营部门关系的背景下探讨了这些概念,做出了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信