How do we conduct a national transfusion related lookback program?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1111/trf.17955
Nicole Priddee, Tiffany Pietrek, Lorna McLintock, Elizabeth Masterson, Megan Rowley, Kirsty Roy, Alan Yeung, Ike Anya, Daniel Carter, Stephen Barclay, Celia Jackson, Gill Hawkins, Nicola Steedman
{"title":"How do we conduct a national transfusion related lookback program?","authors":"Nicole Priddee, Tiffany Pietrek, Lorna McLintock, Elizabeth Masterson, Megan Rowley, Kirsty Roy, Alan Yeung, Ike Anya, Daniel Carter, Stephen Barclay, Celia Jackson, Gill Hawkins, Nicola Steedman","doi":"10.1111/trf.17955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lookback investigations are conducted by blood services when a risk of transmission of infection from a donor to a recipient has been identified. They involve tracing transfusion recipients and offering them testing for the relevant infectious agent. Results are relayed to the recipient to provide reassurance that there has been no transmission or to ensure appropriate treatment and care if required, and blood services are able to learn lessons from the planning, delivery, and outcomes of the investigation. A national lookback exercise was conducted in Scotland following the introduction of a test to identify occult hepatitis B infection, as recommended by the UK Advisory Committee for the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) in 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This paper outlines the development and delivery of a national lookback program. It discusses the logistical, economic, ethical, regulatory, and scientific issues that were considered during the planning and delivery of the lookback exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Development and delivery of a national lookback required robust governance, engagement of all relevant stakeholders and a shared understanding of aims, effective communication, systems, resources, limitations, and project management. Outcomes included a high testing uptake, low levels of reported anxiety, and a comprehensive data set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Key aspects for delivery of a successful large-scale lookback program include a patient-centered approach, clear and accessible communication, and whole-systems multiagency collaboration. Major challenges include stakeholder engagement and capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lookback investigations are conducted by blood services when a risk of transmission of infection from a donor to a recipient has been identified. They involve tracing transfusion recipients and offering them testing for the relevant infectious agent. Results are relayed to the recipient to provide reassurance that there has been no transmission or to ensure appropriate treatment and care if required, and blood services are able to learn lessons from the planning, delivery, and outcomes of the investigation. A national lookback exercise was conducted in Scotland following the introduction of a test to identify occult hepatitis B infection, as recommended by the UK Advisory Committee for the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) in 2021.

Methods and materials: This paper outlines the development and delivery of a national lookback program. It discusses the logistical, economic, ethical, regulatory, and scientific issues that were considered during the planning and delivery of the lookback exercise.

Results: Development and delivery of a national lookback required robust governance, engagement of all relevant stakeholders and a shared understanding of aims, effective communication, systems, resources, limitations, and project management. Outcomes included a high testing uptake, low levels of reported anxiety, and a comprehensive data set.

Conclusion: Key aspects for delivery of a successful large-scale lookback program include a patient-centered approach, clear and accessible communication, and whole-systems multiagency collaboration. Major challenges include stakeholder engagement and capacity.

如何开展全国输血相关回溯计划?
背景:血液服务机构在发现献血者有传染给受血者的风险时,会进行回访调查。调查包括追踪受血者,并为他们提供相关传染源的检测。检测结果将转达给受血者,以保证没有发生传播,或确保在必要时提供适当的治疗和护理,同时血液服务机构也能从调查的计划、实施和结果中吸取经验教训。根据英国血液、组织和器官安全咨询委员会(SaBTO)的建议,苏格兰于 2021 年引入了隐匿性乙型肝炎感染的检测方法,随后开展了全国性的回溯工作:本文概述了国家回溯计划的制定和实施。方法和材料:本文概述了国家回溯计划的制定和实施情况,讨论了在回溯计划的规划和实施过程中考虑的后勤、经济、伦理、监管和科学问题:结果:制定和实施国家回望计划需要强有力的管理、所有相关利益方的参与、对目标的共同理解、有效的沟通、系统、资源、限制和项目管理。结果包括测试的高接受率、低焦虑水平和全面的数据集:成功实施大规模回望计划的关键因素包括以患者为中心的方法、清晰易懂的沟通以及全系统多机构合作。主要挑战包括利益相关者的参与和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信