Thrombogenicity assessment of perfusable tissue engineered constructs: a systematic review.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Luna Maria Haderer, Yijun Zhou, Peter Tang, Assal Daneshgar, Brigitta Globke, Felix Krenzien, Anja Reutzel-Selke, Marie Weinhart, Johann Pratschke, Igor M Sauer, Karl Herbert Hillebrandt, Eriselda Keshi
{"title":"Thrombogenicity assessment of perfusable tissue engineered constructs: a systematic review.","authors":"Luna Maria Haderer, Yijun Zhou, Peter Tang, Assal Daneshgar, Brigitta Globke, Felix Krenzien, Anja Reutzel-Selke, Marie Weinhart, Johann Pratschke, Igor M Sauer, Karl Herbert Hillebrandt, Eriselda Keshi","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vascular surgery faces a critical demand for novel vascular grafts that are biocompatible and thromboresistant. This urgency particularly applies to bypass operations involving small caliber vessels. In the realm of tissue engineering, the development of fully vascularized organs holds great promise as a solution to organ shortage for transplantation. To achieve this, it is imperative to (re-)construct a biocompatible and non-thrombogenic vascular network within these organs. In this systematic review, we identify, classify and discuss basic principles and methods used to perform in vitro/ex vivo dynamic thrombogenicity testing of perfusable tissue engineered organs and tissues. We conducted a pre-registered systematic review of studies published in the last 23 years according to PRISMA-P Guidelines, comprising a systematic data extraction, in-depth analysis and risk of bias assessment of 116 included studies. We identified shaking (n=28), flow loop (n=17), ex vivo (arterio-venous shunt, n=33) and dynamic in vitro models (n=38) as main approaches for thrombogenicity assessment. This comprehensive review unveils a prevalent lack of standardization and serves as a valuable guide in the design of standardized experimental setups.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vascular surgery faces a critical demand for novel vascular grafts that are biocompatible and thromboresistant. This urgency particularly applies to bypass operations involving small caliber vessels. In the realm of tissue engineering, the development of fully vascularized organs holds great promise as a solution to organ shortage for transplantation. To achieve this, it is imperative to (re-)construct a biocompatible and non-thrombogenic vascular network within these organs. In this systematic review, we identify, classify and discuss basic principles and methods used to perform in vitro/ex vivo dynamic thrombogenicity testing of perfusable tissue engineered organs and tissues. We conducted a pre-registered systematic review of studies published in the last 23 years according to PRISMA-P Guidelines, comprising a systematic data extraction, in-depth analysis and risk of bias assessment of 116 included studies. We identified shaking (n=28), flow loop (n=17), ex vivo (arterio-venous shunt, n=33) and dynamic in vitro models (n=38) as main approaches for thrombogenicity assessment. This comprehensive review unveils a prevalent lack of standardization and serves as a valuable guide in the design of standardized experimental setups.

可灌注组织工程构建物的血栓形成评估:系统综述。
血管外科对具有生物相容性和抗血栓形成能力的新型血管移植物有着迫切的需求。这种迫切性尤其适用于涉及小口径血管的搭桥手术。在组织工程领域,开发完全血管化的器官是解决器官移植短缺问题的一大希望。要实现这一目标,必须在这些器官内(重新)构建生物相容性和非血栓形成的血管网络。在本系统综述中,我们对用于对可灌注组织工程器官和组织进行体外/体内动态血栓形成性测试的基本原则和方法进行了识别、分类和讨论。我们根据《PRISMA-P 指南》对过去 23 年中发表的研究进行了预先登记的系统综述,包括对 116 项纳入研究的系统数据提取、深入分析和偏倚风险评估。我们发现摇动模型(28 例)、环流模型(17 例)、体外模型(动静脉分流,33 例)和动态体外模型(38 例)是血栓形成性评估的主要方法。本综述揭示了普遍存在的缺乏标准化的问题,对设计标准化实验装置具有重要指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信