The Glutamatergic Effects of Clinical Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depressed Populations: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1159/000538690
Maggie K Pecsok, Arianna Mordy, Mario A Cristancho, Desmond Oathes, David R Roalf
{"title":"The Glutamatergic Effects of Clinical Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depressed Populations: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies.","authors":"Maggie K Pecsok, Arianna Mordy, Mario A Cristancho, Desmond Oathes, David R Roalf","doi":"10.1159/000538690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) alleviates symptoms of major depressive disorder, but its neurobiological mechanisms remain to be fully understood. Growing evidence from proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HMRS) studies suggests that rTMS alters excitatory and inhibitory neurometabolites. This preliminary meta-analysis aims to quantify current trends in the literature and identify future directions for the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten eligible studies that quantified Glutamate (Glu), Glu+Glutamine (Glx), or GABA before and after an rTMS intervention in depressed samples were sourced from PubMed, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, and primary literature following PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated, and moderators, such as neurometabolite and 1HMRS sequence, were assessed. It was hypothesized that rTMS would increase cortical neurometabolites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within-subjects data from 224 cases encompassing 31 neurometabolite effects (k) were analyzed. Active rTMS in clinical responders (n = 128; k = 22) nominally increased glutamatergic neurometabolites (d = 0.15 [95% CI: -0.01, 0.30], p = 0.06). No change was found in clinical nonresponders (p = 0.8) or sham rTMS participants (p = 0.4). A significant increase was identified in Glx (p = 0.01), but not Glu (p = 0.6). Importantly, effect size across conditions were associated with the number of rTMS pulses patients received (p = 0.05), suggesting dose dependence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical rTMS is associated with a nominal, dose-dependent increase in glutamatergic neurometabolites, suggesting rTMS may induce Glu-dependent neuroplasticity and upregulate neurometabolism. More, larger scale studies adhering to established acquisition and reporting standards are needed to further elucidate the neurometabolic mechanisms of rTMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) alleviates symptoms of major depressive disorder, but its neurobiological mechanisms remain to be fully understood. Growing evidence from proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HMRS) studies suggests that rTMS alters excitatory and inhibitory neurometabolites. This preliminary meta-analysis aims to quantify current trends in the literature and identify future directions for the field.

Methods: Ten eligible studies that quantified Glutamate (Glu), Glu+Glutamine (Glx), or GABA before and after an rTMS intervention in depressed samples were sourced from PubMed, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, and primary literature following PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated, and moderators, such as neurometabolite and 1HMRS sequence, were assessed. It was hypothesized that rTMS would increase cortical neurometabolites.

Results: Within-subjects data from 224 cases encompassing 31 neurometabolite effects (k) were analyzed. Active rTMS in clinical responders (n = 128; k = 22) nominally increased glutamatergic neurometabolites (d = 0.15 [95% CI: -0.01, 0.30], p = 0.06). No change was found in clinical nonresponders (p = 0.8) or sham rTMS participants (p = 0.4). A significant increase was identified in Glx (p = 0.01), but not Glu (p = 0.6). Importantly, effect size across conditions were associated with the number of rTMS pulses patients received (p = 0.05), suggesting dose dependence.

Conclusions: Clinical rTMS is associated with a nominal, dose-dependent increase in glutamatergic neurometabolites, suggesting rTMS may induce Glu-dependent neuroplasticity and upregulate neurometabolism. More, larger scale studies adhering to established acquisition and reporting standards are needed to further elucidate the neurometabolic mechanisms of rTMS.

临床重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症人群的谷氨酸能效应:质子磁共振波谱研究的初步元分析》(Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies)。
简介重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可减轻重度抑郁症的症状,但其神经生物学机制仍有待全面了解。越来越多的质子磁共振波谱(1HMRS)研究表明,经颅磁刺激会改变兴奋性和抑制性神经代谢物。本初步荟萃分析旨在量化目前的文献趋势,并确定该领域的未来发展方向:按照 PRISMA 指南,从 PubMed、MEDLINE、PsychInfo、Google Scholar 和主要文献中选取了 10 项符合条件的研究,这些研究对抑郁样本在经颅磁刺激干预前后的谷氨酸(Glu)、谷氨酰胺(Glu+Glutamine)或 GABA 进行了量化。采用随机效应模型对数据进行了汇总,计算了Cohen's d效应大小,并评估了神经代谢物和1HMRS序列等调节因子。假设经颅磁刺激会增加皮层神经代谢物:结果:分析了来自 224 个病例的受试者内数据,包括 31 种神经代谢物效应(k)。在临床应答者(n = 128;k = 22)中,主动经颅磁刺激可增加谷氨酸能神经代谢物(d = 0.15 [95% CI:-0.01, 0.30],p = 0.06)。临床无反应者(p = 0.8)或假经颅磁刺激参与者(p = 0.4)未发现任何变化。Glx(p = 0.01)有明显增加,但 Glu(p = 0.6)没有。重要的是,不同条件下的效应大小与患者接受的经颅磁刺激脉冲数有关(p = 0.05),这表明了剂量依赖性:临床经颅磁刺激与谷氨酸能神经代谢产物名义上的剂量依赖性增加有关,表明经颅磁刺激可能诱导谷氨酸依赖性神经可塑性并上调神经代谢。要进一步阐明经颅磁刺激的神经代谢机制,还需要按照既定的采集和报告标准进行更多更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信