Predictors of post-healing recurrence in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Yujian Sun, Yue Zhou, Yu Dai, Yufan Pan, Yi Xiao, Yufeng Yu
{"title":"Predictors of post-healing recurrence in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yujian Sun, Yue Zhou, Yu Dai, Yufan Pan, Yi Xiao, Yufeng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most prevalent, serious, and costly consequences of diabetes, often associated with peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. These ulcers contribute to high disability and mortality rates in patients and pose a major challenge to clinical management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the risk prediction models for post-healing recurrence in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients, so as to provide a reference for clinical staff to choose appropriate prediction models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched five databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Database) from their inception to September 23, 2023, for relevant literature. After data extraction, the quality of the literature was evaluated using the Predictive Model Research Bias Risk and Suitability Assessment tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies involving 5956 patients were included. The recurrence rate after DFU healing ranged from 6.2 % to 41.4 %. Nine studies established 15 risk prediction models, and the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.660 to 0.940, of which 12 models had an AUC≥0.7, indicating good prediction performance. The combined AUC value of the 9 validation models was 0.83 (95 % confidence interval: 0.79-0.88). Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed for 10 models, external validation for 5 models, and internal validation for 6 models. Meta-analysis showed that 14 predictors, such as age and living alone, could predict post-healing recurrence in DFU patients (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To enhance the quality of these risk prediction models, there is potential for future improvements in terms of follow-up duration, model calibration, and validation processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":" ","pages":"542-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most prevalent, serious, and costly consequences of diabetes, often associated with peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. These ulcers contribute to high disability and mortality rates in patients and pose a major challenge to clinical management.

Objective: To systematically review the risk prediction models for post-healing recurrence in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients, so as to provide a reference for clinical staff to choose appropriate prediction models.

Methods: The authors searched five databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Database) from their inception to September 23, 2023, for relevant literature. After data extraction, the quality of the literature was evaluated using the Predictive Model Research Bias Risk and Suitability Assessment tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software.

Results: A total of 9 studies involving 5956 patients were included. The recurrence rate after DFU healing ranged from 6.2 % to 41.4 %. Nine studies established 15 risk prediction models, and the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.660 to 0.940, of which 12 models had an AUC≥0.7, indicating good prediction performance. The combined AUC value of the 9 validation models was 0.83 (95 % confidence interval: 0.79-0.88). Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed for 10 models, external validation for 5 models, and internal validation for 6 models. Meta-analysis showed that 14 predictors, such as age and living alone, could predict post-healing recurrence in DFU patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: To enhance the quality of these risk prediction models, there is potential for future improvements in terms of follow-up duration, model calibration, and validation processes.

糖尿病足溃疡患者愈合后复发的预测因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:糖尿病足溃疡是糖尿病最常见、最严重、最昂贵的后果之一,通常与周围神经病变和周围动脉疾病相关。这些溃疡导致患者残疾率和死亡率居高不下,给临床管理带来了巨大挑战:系统回顾糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者愈合后复发的风险预测模型,为临床医务人员选择合适的预测模型提供参考:作者检索了五个数据库(Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE和中国生物医学数据库)从开始到2023年9月23日的相关文献。数据提取后,使用预测模型研究偏差风险和适宜性评估工具(PROBAST)对文献质量进行评估。使用 STATA 17.0 软件进行了元分析:共纳入 9 项研究,涉及 5956 名患者。DFU愈合后的复发率从6.2%到41.4%不等。9 项研究建立了 15 个风险预测模型,曲线下面积(AUC)从 0.660 到 0.940 不等,其中 12 个模型的 AUC ≥0.7,表明预测效果良好。9 个验证模型的综合 AUC 值为 0.83(95% 置信区间:0.79-0.88)。对 10 个模型进行了 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验,对 5 个模型进行了外部验证,对 6 个模型进行了内部验证。Meta 分析表明,年龄和独居等 14 个预测因子可预测 DFU 患者愈合后的复发(P 结论:DFU 患者愈合后复发的风险预测因子较低,而独居患者愈合后复发的风险预测因子较高:为了提高这些风险预测模型的质量,未来有可能在随访时间、模型校准和验证过程方面进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信