Optimization of Fluorapatite/Bioactive Glass Nanocomposite Foams as Bone Tissue Scaffold: An in Vivo Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Seyedali Seyedmajidi, Maryam Seyedmajidi, Sina Haghanifar
{"title":"Optimization of Fluorapatite/Bioactive Glass Nanocomposite Foams as Bone Tissue Scaffold: An in Vivo Study.","authors":"Seyedali Seyedmajidi, Maryam Seyedmajidi, Sina Haghanifar","doi":"10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.12.4.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the suitability of nanocomposite foams of fluorapatite and bioactive glass (FA /BG) in different weight ratios as scaffolds for bone tissue in rat tibia regeneration to determine the optimal composition. FA and BG nano powders with a weight ratio of 25% FA/75% BG (compound 1) and 75% FA/25% BG (compound 2) were used as precursors for gel casting to produce nanocomposite foams. Thirty rats were randomly divided into two equal groups. Disk-shaped samples of each compound were implanted into the tibias of 15 rats. After 15, 30, or 60 days, five rats from each group were sacrificed and subjected to radiological, histopathological, and histomorphometrical examination. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. No foreign body reaction was observed in either group at all intervals, and the bone-biomaterial junction was direct. Overall, the inflammation rate, and the number of blood vessels, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts decreased over time in both groups. However, the number of osteocytes, trabecular bone thickness, and the percentage of new bone formation increased, in contrast to the remaining biomaterial percentage. Most of the changes in the group implanted with compound 2 were significantly more significant and faster than in the other group. Although the composite with the higher percentage of FA was superior to the composite with the higher percentage of BG, considering the results of our previous similar studies, the composite with the same percentage of FA and BG is more favorable to be used as a substitute for bone tissue in the body.</p>","PeriodicalId":14152,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"388-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11240056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.12.4.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the suitability of nanocomposite foams of fluorapatite and bioactive glass (FA /BG) in different weight ratios as scaffolds for bone tissue in rat tibia regeneration to determine the optimal composition. FA and BG nano powders with a weight ratio of 25% FA/75% BG (compound 1) and 75% FA/25% BG (compound 2) were used as precursors for gel casting to produce nanocomposite foams. Thirty rats were randomly divided into two equal groups. Disk-shaped samples of each compound were implanted into the tibias of 15 rats. After 15, 30, or 60 days, five rats from each group were sacrificed and subjected to radiological, histopathological, and histomorphometrical examination. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. No foreign body reaction was observed in either group at all intervals, and the bone-biomaterial junction was direct. Overall, the inflammation rate, and the number of blood vessels, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts decreased over time in both groups. However, the number of osteocytes, trabecular bone thickness, and the percentage of new bone formation increased, in contrast to the remaining biomaterial percentage. Most of the changes in the group implanted with compound 2 were significantly more significant and faster than in the other group. Although the composite with the higher percentage of FA was superior to the composite with the higher percentage of BG, considering the results of our previous similar studies, the composite with the same percentage of FA and BG is more favorable to be used as a substitute for bone tissue in the body.

氟磷灰石/生物活性玻璃纳米复合泡沫作为骨组织支架的优化:体内研究。
本研究调查了不同重量比的氟磷灰石和生物活性玻璃(FA /BG)纳米复合泡沫作为大鼠胫骨再生骨组织支架的适用性,以确定最佳成分。将重量比分别为 25% FA/75% BG(化合物 1)和 75% FA/25% BG(化合物 2)的 FA 和 BG 纳米粉末用作凝胶浇注的前体,以生产纳米复合泡沫。30 只大鼠被随机分为两组。将每种化合物的盘状样品植入 15 只大鼠的胫骨中。15、30 或 60 天后,每组各牺牲 5 只大鼠,并对其进行放射学、组织病理学和组织形态学检查。数据使用 SPSS 软件进行分析。两组大鼠在所有时间间隔内均未观察到异物反应,骨-生物材料交界处是直接的。总体而言,随着时间的推移,两组的炎症率、血管、成骨细胞和破骨细胞数量均有所下降。然而,骨细胞数量、骨小梁厚度和新骨形成的百分比却增加了,这与剩余生物材料的百分比形成了对比。植入化合物 2 组的大多数变化明显比另一组更显著、更快。虽然FA比例较高的复合材料优于BG比例较高的复合材料,但考虑到我们之前类似研究的结果,FA和BG比例相同的复合材料更有利于用作体内骨组织的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine (IJMCM) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly publication of Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center (CMBRC), Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. The journal covers all cellular & molecular biology and medicine disciplines such as the genetic basis of disease, biomarker discovery in diagnosis and treatment, genomics and proteomics, bioinformatics, computer applications in human biology, stem cells and tissue engineering, medical biotechnology, nanomedicine, cellular processes related to growth, death and survival, clinical biochemistry, molecular & cellular immunology, molecular and cellular aspects of infectious disease and cancer research. IJMCM is a free access journal. All open access articles published in IJMCM are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY. The journal doesn''t have any submission and article processing charges (APCs).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信