Superficial temporal artery access for transfemoral or transbrachial carotid artery stenting in selected patients considered unfit for carotid surgery.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Angiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05231-3
Piotr Myrcha, Izabela Taranta, Włodzimierz Hendiger, João Rocha-Neves, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Peter Gloviczki
{"title":"Superficial temporal artery access for transfemoral or transbrachial carotid artery stenting in selected patients considered unfit for carotid surgery.","authors":"Piotr Myrcha, Izabela Taranta, Włodzimierz Hendiger, João Rocha-Neves, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Peter Gloviczki","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05231-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfemoral (TFCAS) or transbrachial carotid artery stenting (TBCAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treatment of high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. A difficult aortic arch (i.e., type III or bovine arch) and/or a tortuous/stenosed common carotid artery (CCA) are potential reasons for technical failure. This study explores the benefits of superficial temporal artery access (STAA) in aiding TFCAS or TBCAS for patients with challenging anatomical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of patients who underwent TFCAS or TBCAS using STAA between January and November 2023 were prospectively collected. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, and imaging studies were reviewed. Primary outcomes included 30-day stroke/death and technical success. Secondary outcomes and causes of failures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (mean age: 74 [range: 66-84] years) with difficult aortic arch (N.=2), CCA tortuosity (N.=2), proximal CCA stenosis (N.=2), previous technical TFCAS failure (N.=2) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) (N.=2) underwent TFCAS or TBCAS supported by STAA. Successful STAA was possible in eight patients (six facilitated TFCAS and two TBCAS. after TBCAS occurred TIA). In two cases STAA was not successful. There were no deaths or strokes within 30 days, transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred in one patient. Follow-up Duplex ultrasound confirmed occlusion of the STA in all patients, without clinical consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study suggests that TFCAS/TBCAS supported by STAA is a viable and safe approach when traditional access methods are ineffective and transcarotid artery stenting in not available or not possible. Despite a 20% technical failure in the current series, this technique may be useful for challenging anatomy of the aortic arch, CCA stenosis and tortuosity, and AIOD. When feasible, STAA may be a promising adjunct to TFCAS/TBCAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05231-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transfemoral (TFCAS) or transbrachial carotid artery stenting (TBCAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treatment of high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. A difficult aortic arch (i.e., type III or bovine arch) and/or a tortuous/stenosed common carotid artery (CCA) are potential reasons for technical failure. This study explores the benefits of superficial temporal artery access (STAA) in aiding TFCAS or TBCAS for patients with challenging anatomical conditions.

Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent TFCAS or TBCAS using STAA between January and November 2023 were prospectively collected. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, and imaging studies were reviewed. Primary outcomes included 30-day stroke/death and technical success. Secondary outcomes and causes of failures were assessed.

Results: Ten patients (mean age: 74 [range: 66-84] years) with difficult aortic arch (N.=2), CCA tortuosity (N.=2), proximal CCA stenosis (N.=2), previous technical TFCAS failure (N.=2) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) (N.=2) underwent TFCAS or TBCAS supported by STAA. Successful STAA was possible in eight patients (six facilitated TFCAS and two TBCAS. after TBCAS occurred TIA). In two cases STAA was not successful. There were no deaths or strokes within 30 days, transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred in one patient. Follow-up Duplex ultrasound confirmed occlusion of the STA in all patients, without clinical consequences.

Conclusions: This prospective study suggests that TFCAS/TBCAS supported by STAA is a viable and safe approach when traditional access methods are ineffective and transcarotid artery stenting in not available or not possible. Despite a 20% technical failure in the current series, this technique may be useful for challenging anatomy of the aortic arch, CCA stenosis and tortuosity, and AIOD. When feasible, STAA may be a promising adjunct to TFCAS/TBCAS.

颞浅动脉入路,为部分不适合接受颈动脉手术的患者进行经口或经肱颈动脉支架植入术。
背景:经股动脉(TFCAS)或经肱动脉颈动脉支架植入术(TBCAS)是颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)的替代方法,用于治疗颈内动脉(ICA)高度狭窄。困难的主动脉弓(即 III 型或牛弓)和/或迂曲/狭窄的颈总动脉 (CCA) 是技术失败的潜在原因。本研究探讨了颞浅动脉入路(STAA)在帮助具有挑战性解剖条件的患者进行 TFCAS 或 TBCAS 时的益处:前瞻性地收集了 2023 年 1 月至 11 月间使用 STAA 进行 TFCAS 或 TBCAS 的患者的临床数据。回顾了人口统计学、合并症、临床表现和影像学研究。主要结果包括 30 天卒中/死亡和技术成功率。对次要结果和失败原因进行了评估:10例患者(平均年龄:74 [范围:66-84] 岁])患有主动脉弓困难(2例)、CCA迂曲(2例)、CCA近端狭窄(2例)、既往TFCAS技术失败(2例)和主动脉髂闭塞疾病(2例),在STAA支持下接受了TFCAS或TBCAS手术。八名患者成功实施了 STAA(六名患者在 TFCAS 的帮助下实施了 TBCAS,两名患者在 TBCAS 之后发生了 TIA)。两例 STAA 不成功。30 天内无死亡或中风,一名患者发生了短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)。随访的多普勒超声检查证实所有患者的 STA 均已闭塞,但未造成临床后果:这项前瞻性研究表明,在传统入路方法无效、经颈动脉支架植入术不适用或不可能时,STAA 支持的 TFCAS/TBCAS 是一种可行且安全的方法。尽管在目前的系列手术中有 20% 的技术失败,但这项技术可能对主动脉弓的高难度解剖、CCA 狭窄和迂曲以及 AIOD 有帮助。在可行的情况下,STAA 可作为 TFCAS/TBCAS 的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信