Esophageal Lichen Planus: The Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Reducing Inflammation and Need for Dilation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Keshav Kukreja, Ambuj Kumar, Charles Camisa, John Jacobs, Joel Richter
{"title":"Esophageal Lichen Planus: The Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Reducing Inflammation and Need for Dilation.","authors":"Keshav Kukreja, Ambuj Kumar, Charles Camisa, John Jacobs, Joel Richter","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Esophageal Lichen Planus (ELP) is a rare inflammatory disease most seen in middle-aged Caucasian women, manifested by sloughing mucosa, thick exudate, and proximal strictures. Most case reports and small series highlight using steroids and other immunosuppressants. To our knowledge, oral tablet tacrolimus has not been studied. We aimed to assess the change in ELP after oral tacrolimus treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was the efficacy of tacrolimus objectively through our scoring system, ELPSS. All consecutive adults with ELP who underwent more than one EGD by two esophagologists and being treated with tacrolimus or other treatment were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Inflammation and fibrostenotic disease were graded using the novel ELP Severity Score (ELPSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty two patients met the inclusion criteria. Half (11) received tacrolimus (dose 1-2 mg BID) and half (11) received other therapy (i.e. cyclosporine, topical steroids, or none). Mean ELPSS on first EGD, extraesophageal manifestations of disease, presenting symptoms, and baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Among patients on Tac vs No-Tac, there was a statistically significant improvement in ELPSS (mean difference 1.8 pts; 95% CI 0.25-3.38; P=0.02). Response rate was 89% with Tac vs 30% with No-Tac (P=0.025). All 22 patients underwent bougie dilation safely with a mean diameter of 16 mm achieved. Patients on Tac also required less frequent dilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral tablet tacrolimus reduced the inflammatory and fibrostenotic components of ELP. Thus, low-dose oral tacrolimus is safe and should be considered in patients with more severe disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Esophageal Lichen Planus (ELP) is a rare inflammatory disease most seen in middle-aged Caucasian women, manifested by sloughing mucosa, thick exudate, and proximal strictures. Most case reports and small series highlight using steroids and other immunosuppressants. To our knowledge, oral tablet tacrolimus has not been studied. We aimed to assess the change in ELP after oral tacrolimus treatment.

Methods: The primary outcome was the efficacy of tacrolimus objectively through our scoring system, ELPSS. All consecutive adults with ELP who underwent more than one EGD by two esophagologists and being treated with tacrolimus or other treatment were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Inflammation and fibrostenotic disease were graded using the novel ELP Severity Score (ELPSS).

Results: Twenty two patients met the inclusion criteria. Half (11) received tacrolimus (dose 1-2 mg BID) and half (11) received other therapy (i.e. cyclosporine, topical steroids, or none). Mean ELPSS on first EGD, extraesophageal manifestations of disease, presenting symptoms, and baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Among patients on Tac vs No-Tac, there was a statistically significant improvement in ELPSS (mean difference 1.8 pts; 95% CI 0.25-3.38; P=0.02). Response rate was 89% with Tac vs 30% with No-Tac (P=0.025). All 22 patients underwent bougie dilation safely with a mean diameter of 16 mm achieved. Patients on Tac also required less frequent dilation.

Conclusion: Oral tablet tacrolimus reduced the inflammatory and fibrostenotic components of ELP. Thus, low-dose oral tacrolimus is safe and should be considered in patients with more severe disease.

食管扁平苔藓:他克莫司在减轻炎症和扩张需求方面的有效性和安全性。
背景和目的:食管扁平苔藓(ELP)是一种罕见的炎症性疾病,多见于中年高加索女性,表现为粘膜脱落、渗出物粘稠和近端狭窄。大多数病例报告和小型系列研究都强调使用类固醇和其他免疫抑制剂。据我们所知,口服片剂他克莫司尚未被研究过。我们旨在评估口服他克莫司治疗后ELP的变化:主要结果是通过我们的评分系统--ELPSS客观评估他克莫司的疗效。这项回顾性队列研究的对象是所有连续接受过一次以上由两名食管专家进行的胃肠道造影检查,并正在接受他克莫司或其他治疗的成人 ELP 患者。炎症和纤维狭窄病变采用新的胃食管返流严重程度评分法(ELPSS)进行分级:22名患者符合纳入标准。半数(11 例)患者接受了他克莫司治疗(剂量为 1-2 毫克,每日一次),半数(11 例)患者接受了其他治疗(如环孢素、局部类固醇或无)。两组患者首次胃肠造影时的平均 ELPSS、疾病的食管外表现、主要症状和基线特征相似。在接受 Tac 与 No-Tac 治疗的患者中,ELPSS 有显著的统计学改善(平均差异 1.8 分;95% CI 0.25-3.38;P=0.02)。Tac疗法的应答率为89%,而No-Tac疗法的应答率为30%(P=0.025)。所有 22 名患者都安全地接受了通气扩张术,平均直径为 16 毫米。使用 Tac 的患者所需的扩张次数也较少:结论:口服片剂他克莫司减少了ELP的炎症和纤维狭窄成分。因此,小剂量口服他克莫司是安全的,病情较重的患者应考虑使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信