Flexicurity and employment inflows in the EU28 countries: a panel data analysis

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Marina Ferent-Pipas
{"title":"Flexicurity and employment inflows in the EU28 countries: a panel data analysis","authors":"Marina Ferent-Pipas","doi":"10.1108/ijm-10-2022-0460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper examines the relationship between flexicurity and employment inflows in the EU28 countries over the 2007–2019 period. Flexicurity is defined as the mix of flexible contractual arrangements, social security systems, active labor market policies and lifelong learning strategies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using two-way fixed effects two-stage least squares, we estimate the employment inflows as a function of an equal-weighted flexicurity composite indicator and other labor market, economic and business environment characteristics. To ensure the robustness of results, in additional specifications, we test the sensitivity of the flexicurity’s coefficient to: (1) the change of instruments; (2) the removal of different non-core variables and (3) the consideration of recessionary periods European regions. In addition, we estimate regressions with separate flexicurity components and with differently constructed flexicurity indices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In all the estimations, increased flexicurity efforts are positively related to employment inflows. Increased flexicurity efforts benefit Eastern European countries more than the Northern and Anglo-Saxon groups. Not only a synergistic policy action that uses an equal combination of the four pillars of flexicurity has a positive impact on the employment inflow rate. Strategies that give more weight to the formation of skills seem to favor the labor market reinsertion most.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study in the flexicurity–employment inflows literature since it: (1) follows all the European Union countries over more than a decade; (2) brings some tentative findings on the socio-cultural moderation of flexicurity’s impact on employment inflows and (3) explores different country-level flexicurity indices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47915,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Manpower","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Manpower","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-10-2022-0460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper examines the relationship between flexicurity and employment inflows in the EU28 countries over the 2007–2019 period. Flexicurity is defined as the mix of flexible contractual arrangements, social security systems, active labor market policies and lifelong learning strategies.

Design/methodology/approach

Using two-way fixed effects two-stage least squares, we estimate the employment inflows as a function of an equal-weighted flexicurity composite indicator and other labor market, economic and business environment characteristics. To ensure the robustness of results, in additional specifications, we test the sensitivity of the flexicurity’s coefficient to: (1) the change of instruments; (2) the removal of different non-core variables and (3) the consideration of recessionary periods European regions. In addition, we estimate regressions with separate flexicurity components and with differently constructed flexicurity indices.

Findings

In all the estimations, increased flexicurity efforts are positively related to employment inflows. Increased flexicurity efforts benefit Eastern European countries more than the Northern and Anglo-Saxon groups. Not only a synergistic policy action that uses an equal combination of the four pillars of flexicurity has a positive impact on the employment inflow rate. Strategies that give more weight to the formation of skills seem to favor the labor market reinsertion most.

Originality/value

To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study in the flexicurity–employment inflows literature since it: (1) follows all the European Union countries over more than a decade; (2) brings some tentative findings on the socio-cultural moderation of flexicurity’s impact on employment inflows and (3) explores different country-level flexicurity indices.

欧盟 28 国的弹性保障和就业流入:面板数据分析
本文探讨了 2007-2019 年期间欧盟 28 国灵活保障与就业流入之间的关系。灵活保障被定义为灵活的合同安排、社会保障体系、积极的劳动力市场政策和终身学习战略的组合。设计/方法/途径我们采用双向固定效应两阶段最小二乘法,将就业流入量作为等权重灵活保障综合指标与其他劳动力市场、经济和商业环境特征的函数进行估计。为确保结果的稳健性,我们在额外的规格中检验了灵活保障系数对以下因素的敏感性:(1) 工具的改变;(2) 剔除不同的非核心变量;(3) 考虑欧洲地区的衰退期。此外,我们还利用单独的灵活保障组成部分和不同构建的灵活保障指数对回归进行了估计。与北欧和盎格鲁-撒克逊国家组相比,灵活保障力度的加大使东欧国家受益更多。并非只有将灵活保障的四大支柱同等结合使用的协同政策行动才会对就业流入率产生积极影响。据我们所知,这是灵活保障--就业流入文献中的第一项综合性研究,因为它:(1)对所有欧盟国家进行了十多年的跟踪研究;(2)就灵活保障对就业流入的影响在社会文化方面的调节作用得出了一些初步结论;(3)探讨了不同国家层面的灵活保障指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
11.40%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ■Employee welfare ■Human aspects during the introduction of technology ■Human resource recruitment, retention and development ■National and international aspects of HR planning ■Objectives of human resource planning and forecasting requirements ■The working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信