Challenges experienced by those with polycystic ovary syndrome in healthcare interactions: a qualitative evidence synthesis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
China Harrison , Chau Thien Tay , Maureen A. Busby , Aya Mousa , Helena Teede , Jacky Boivin
{"title":"Challenges experienced by those with polycystic ovary syndrome in healthcare interactions: a qualitative evidence synthesis","authors":"China Harrison ,&nbsp;Chau Thien Tay ,&nbsp;Maureen A. Busby ,&nbsp;Aya Mousa ,&nbsp;Helena Teede ,&nbsp;Jacky Boivin","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies report interaction difficulties between patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and healthcare professionals (HCP). This systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis aimed to collate and synthesize the existing peer-reviewed literature investigating challenges for people with PCOS when interacting with HCP. Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM and CINAHL were searched from 1990 to September 2022. Study risk of bias (RoB) was performed and all textual data relevant to challenging interactions between patients with PCOS and HCP were extracted and analysed using thematic synthesis. Of the 6353 studies identified, 28 were included. Two were appraised as high, four as moderate and 22 as low RoB. Four analytic themes were derived illustrating that interactions were challenging when: (i) medical information (PCOS, its management) was not shared in the best way; (ii) information provision and deliberation opportunities were insufficient to achieve outcomes that mattered to patients; (iii) interactions prompted but did not support patient activation; and (iv) health system-level barriers (e.g. policies and guidelines) were present or made worse by HCP behaviour. Future research should examine methods for the implementation and evaluation of established frameworks for sharing medical information and supporting patient agency in the context of PCOS care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324004826/pdfft?md5=c6079b461c39d8d5d8bfc66e902e1b0f&pid=1-s2.0-S1472648324004826-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324004826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies report interaction difficulties between patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and healthcare professionals (HCP). This systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis aimed to collate and synthesize the existing peer-reviewed literature investigating challenges for people with PCOS when interacting with HCP. Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM and CINAHL were searched from 1990 to September 2022. Study risk of bias (RoB) was performed and all textual data relevant to challenging interactions between patients with PCOS and HCP were extracted and analysed using thematic synthesis. Of the 6353 studies identified, 28 were included. Two were appraised as high, four as moderate and 22 as low RoB. Four analytic themes were derived illustrating that interactions were challenging when: (i) medical information (PCOS, its management) was not shared in the best way; (ii) information provision and deliberation opportunities were insufficient to achieve outcomes that mattered to patients; (iii) interactions prompted but did not support patient activation; and (iv) health system-level barriers (e.g. policies and guidelines) were present or made worse by HCP behaviour. Future research should examine methods for the implementation and evaluation of established frameworks for sharing medical information and supporting patient agency in the context of PCOS care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多囊卵巢综合征患者在医疗互动中遇到的挑战:定性证据综述
有研究报告称,多囊卵巢综合症(PCOS)患者与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间的互动存在困难。本系统综述和定性证据综述旨在整理和归纳现有的同行评审文献,调查多囊卵巢综合症患者在与医护人员互动时遇到的困难。检索了 1990 年至 2022 年 9 月期间的 Medline、PsycInfo、EMBASE、All EBM 和 CINAHL。对研究进行了偏倚风险(RoB)分析,并提取了与多囊卵巢综合症患者与保健医生之间具有挑战性的互动相关的所有文本数据,采用专题综合法对其进行了分析。在确定的 6353 项研究中,有 28 项被纳入。其中 6 项被评为高 RoB,4 项被评为中 RoB,22 项被评为低 RoB。得出的四个分析主题表明,在以下情况下,互动具有挑战性:(i) 医疗信息(多囊卵巢综合症及其管理)没有以最佳方式共享;(ii) 信息提供和讨论机会不足,无法实现对患者重要的结果;(iii) 互动促使但不支持患者激活;(iv) 医疗系统层面的障碍(如政策和指南)存在或因保健人员的行为而变得更糟。未来的研究应研究在多囊卵巢综合症护理中,如何实施和评估共享医疗信息和支持患者自主权的既定框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信