Understanding attitudes toward Spain's Trans Law: A content analysis

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Nayra Cernadas, Helena Bonache, Helena Cortina, Alexandra Chas‐Villar, Naira Delgado
{"title":"Understanding attitudes toward Spain's Trans Law: A content analysis","authors":"Nayra Cernadas, Helena Bonache, Helena Cortina, Alexandra Chas‐Villar, Naira Delgado","doi":"10.1111/asap.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>The Spanish Trans Law has sparked great public debate, generating opposing and confrontational discourses on Twitter. As the debate can be influenced by contextual and individual factors, this study aimed to analyze the tweets posted on the day the preliminary draft of the law was presented and the day it was approved, exploring the prevailing attitudes toward the Trans Law in Spain, both supportive and opposing. Through deductive content analysis of 531 tweets, it was observed that the content tended to vary on both days, although the main differences were found between the pro and anti‐law stances. While supportive messages tended to advocate for rights and highlight transphobia, tweets opposing the Trans Law tended to claim that its approval could cause harm to others, especially cisgender women and children. Moreover, we examined the use of feminism, gender essentialism beliefs, and gender self‐determination measures as arguments to support each stance. The findings reflect the importance of contextual and attitudinal dynamics in the narratives posted on Twitter (now rebranded as X) regarding transgender rights. This qualitative research contributes to understanding attitudes toward transgender individuals as expressed on social media, integrating insights from Social Psychology within the current Spanish context.Public significance statementWhen analyzing the content of the tweets commenting on the Spanish Trans Law, two different positions are identified. One supports the law, advocating for rights and taking a stand against transphobia. The other opposes the law, considering it a threat to cisgender women and children. By exploring the reasoning behind the two positions, this study helps to understand attitudes toward trans people online and emphasizes the need to combat misinformation.","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Spanish Trans Law has sparked great public debate, generating opposing and confrontational discourses on Twitter. As the debate can be influenced by contextual and individual factors, this study aimed to analyze the tweets posted on the day the preliminary draft of the law was presented and the day it was approved, exploring the prevailing attitudes toward the Trans Law in Spain, both supportive and opposing. Through deductive content analysis of 531 tweets, it was observed that the content tended to vary on both days, although the main differences were found between the pro and anti‐law stances. While supportive messages tended to advocate for rights and highlight transphobia, tweets opposing the Trans Law tended to claim that its approval could cause harm to others, especially cisgender women and children. Moreover, we examined the use of feminism, gender essentialism beliefs, and gender self‐determination measures as arguments to support each stance. The findings reflect the importance of contextual and attitudinal dynamics in the narratives posted on Twitter (now rebranded as X) regarding transgender rights. This qualitative research contributes to understanding attitudes toward transgender individuals as expressed on social media, integrating insights from Social Psychology within the current Spanish context.Public significance statementWhen analyzing the content of the tweets commenting on the Spanish Trans Law, two different positions are identified. One supports the law, advocating for rights and taking a stand against transphobia. The other opposes the law, considering it a threat to cisgender women and children. By exploring the reasoning behind the two positions, this study helps to understand attitudes toward trans people online and emphasizes the need to combat misinformation.
了解人们对西班牙《跨性别法》的态度:内容分析
西班牙《跨性别法》引发了巨大的公众讨论,在推特上产生了对立和对抗性的言论。由于辩论可能受到环境和个人因素的影响,本研究旨在分析在法律草案初稿提交当天和批准当天发布的推文,探讨西班牙国内对《跨性别法》的普遍态度,包括支持和反对两种态度。通过对 531 条微博的内容进行演绎分析,我们发现这两天的内容往往各不相同,但主要区别在于支持和反对法律的立场。支持变性法的推文倾向于倡导权利和强调变性恐惧症,而反对变性法的推文则倾向于声称批准该法可能会对他人造成伤害,尤其是顺性别妇女和儿童。此外,我们还研究了使用女权主义、性别本质主义信念和性别自决措施作为支持每种立场的论据的情况。研究结果反映了在 Twitter(现已更名为 X)上发布的有关变性人权利的叙述中,背景和态度动态的重要性。这项定性研究有助于理解社交媒体上表达的对变性人的态度,并将社会心理学的见解融入西班牙当前的背景中。 公共意义声明在分析评论西班牙变性法的推文内容时,我们发现了两种不同的立场。一种支持该法,主张权利并反对跨性别恐惧症。另一种则反对该法,认为它对顺性别妇女和儿童构成威胁。通过探讨这两种立场背后的原因,本研究有助于了解人们在网上对变性人的态度,并强调了打击错误信息的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信