Effect of varying temperature increases on the microbial community of Pleistocene and Holocene permafrost

IF 1.5 4区 地球科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Lan Anh Catherine Nguyen , Go Iwahana , Shinji Fukuda , Koyomi Nakazawa , Kenjiro Tadakuma , Josephine Galipon
{"title":"Effect of varying temperature increases on the microbial community of Pleistocene and Holocene permafrost","authors":"Lan Anh Catherine Nguyen ,&nbsp;Go Iwahana ,&nbsp;Shinji Fukuda ,&nbsp;Koyomi Nakazawa ,&nbsp;Kenjiro Tadakuma ,&nbsp;Josephine Galipon","doi":"10.1016/j.polar.2024.101096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The total area covered by permafrost has been continually decreasing over the past decades. This study investigates the effect of various temperature increases on the </span>microbiome<span> of permafrost sampled at the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) Permafrost Tunnel site in Fox, Alaska, USA<span>, corresponding to the Holocene (around 8000 years before present (ybp)) and Pleistocene (around 36,000 ybp), respectively. The soil was subjected to two thawing time courses, with temperature increasing from −4 °C to either +4 °C or +25 °C, and total </span></span></span>nucleic acid<span><span><span> was extracted at each time point. Consistent with previous 16S rRNA </span>amplicon sequencing<span> studies on the Permafrost Tunnel, the Pleistocene was dominated by Clostridia<span><span>, while the Holocene was mainly composed of Clostridia, </span>Bacteroidia and </span></span></span>Alphaproteobacteria<span><span> at −4 °C. Thawing at +25 °C resulted in divergent microbial profiles for permafrost of both ages, with the Pleistocene becoming more similar to the active layer, while the Holocene was relatively less impacted. Prediction of metabolic function revealed that bacteria from the Holocene permafrost activated degradation pathways upon thawing at +25 °C, while bacteria from the Pleistocene were more involved in amino-acid </span>biosynthesis pathways, suggesting different mechanisms of adaptation.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":20316,"journal":{"name":"Polar Science","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873965224000793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The total area covered by permafrost has been continually decreasing over the past decades. This study investigates the effect of various temperature increases on the microbiome of permafrost sampled at the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) Permafrost Tunnel site in Fox, Alaska, USA, corresponding to the Holocene (around 8000 years before present (ybp)) and Pleistocene (around 36,000 ybp), respectively. The soil was subjected to two thawing time courses, with temperature increasing from −4 °C to either +4 °C or +25 °C, and total nucleic acid was extracted at each time point. Consistent with previous 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing studies on the Permafrost Tunnel, the Pleistocene was dominated by Clostridia, while the Holocene was mainly composed of Clostridia, Bacteroidia and Alphaproteobacteria at −4 °C. Thawing at +25 °C resulted in divergent microbial profiles for permafrost of both ages, with the Pleistocene becoming more similar to the active layer, while the Holocene was relatively less impacted. Prediction of metabolic function revealed that bacteria from the Holocene permafrost activated degradation pathways upon thawing at +25 °C, while bacteria from the Pleistocene were more involved in amino-acid biosynthesis pathways, suggesting different mechanisms of adaptation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同温度升高对更新世和全新世永久冻土微生物群落的影响
过去几十年来,永久冻土覆盖的总面积一直在持续减少。本研究调查了在美国阿拉斯加福克斯冷区研究与工程实验室(CRREL)永久冻土隧道(Permafrost Tunnel)取样的永久冻土微生物组受不同温度升高影响的情况,这些永久冻土分别对应全新世(距今约 8000 年)和更新世(距今约 3.6 万年)。土壤经过两个解冻时间过程,温度从-4 °C升至+4 °C或+25 °C,并在每个时间点提取总核酸。与之前对永久冻土隧道进行的 16S rRNA 扩增子测序研究结果一致,在-4 °C时,更新世以梭状芽胞杆菌为主,而全新世则主要由梭状芽胞杆菌、类杆菌和副变形菌组成。在+25 °C的解冻过程中,两个时代的冻土层的微生物特征出现了分化,更新世的冻土层与活动层更加相似,而全新世的冻土层受到的影响相对较小。对新陈代谢功能的预测显示,全新世永久冻土的细菌在+25 °C解冻时激活了降解途径,而更新世的细菌则更多地参与氨基酸生物合成途径,这表明了不同的适应机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polar Science
Polar Science ECOLOGY-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Polar Science is an international, peer-reviewed quarterly journal. It is dedicated to publishing original research articles for sciences relating to the polar regions of the Earth and other planets. Polar Science aims to cover 15 disciplines which are listed below; they cover most aspects of physical sciences, geosciences and life sciences, together with engineering and social sciences. Articles should attract the interest of broad polar science communities, and not be limited to the interests of those who work under specific research subjects. Polar Science also has an Open Archive whereby published articles are made freely available from ScienceDirect after an embargo period of 24 months from the date of publication. - Space and upper atmosphere physics - Atmospheric science/climatology - Glaciology - Oceanography/sea ice studies - Geology/petrology - Solid earth geophysics/seismology - Marine Earth science - Geomorphology/Cenozoic-Quaternary geology - Meteoritics - Terrestrial biology - Marine biology - Animal ecology - Environment - Polar Engineering - Humanities and social sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信