Clay mineral composition drives soil structure behavior and the associated physical properties in Brazilian Oxisols

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Thaís Nascimento Pessoa , Renata Cristina Bovi , Márcio Renato Nunes , Miguel Cooper , Daniel Uteau , Stephan Peth , Paulo Leonel Libardi
{"title":"Clay mineral composition drives soil structure behavior and the associated physical properties in Brazilian Oxisols","authors":"Thaís Nascimento Pessoa ,&nbsp;Renata Cristina Bovi ,&nbsp;Márcio Renato Nunes ,&nbsp;Miguel Cooper ,&nbsp;Daniel Uteau ,&nbsp;Stephan Peth ,&nbsp;Paulo Leonel Libardi","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil aggregation controls several physical, chemical, and biological processes. Soil organic matter (SOM) and its stabilizing agents are regarded as the most important factors driving formation and stabilization of soil aggregates. However, aggregate stability in highly weathered soils may also be related to clay mineral composition and soil chemical properties. This study aims to evaluate the processes controlling soil aggregate stability and to understand the influence of soil chemical and clay mineral composition on the structural stability of highly weathered soils. Four Brazilian Oxisols were investigated: (P1) Xanthic Kandiustox, (P2) Rhodic Haplustox, (P3) Anionic Acrustox, and (P4) Typic Hapludox. Undisturbed and disturbed soil samples were collected from the Bw horizon under a native forest. Soil structural stability was evaluated using a variety of techniques and indices, including mean weight diameter (MWD) by hydraulic stress, mechanically-dispersible clay (MDC) by turbidimetry, tensile strength (TS) by crushing aggregates, and soil structural stability index (SSI) taking into account soil organic carbon (SOC). In general, P1 exhibited the highest MDC content (3.05 ± 0.54, Nephelometric Turbidity Unit, NTU/g L<sup>‐−1</sup>), while P4 had the highest MWD (10.26 ± 0.24 mm) and the highest TS (80.42 ± 18.54 kPa) within the 8–4 mm aggregate size class. The TS for the 4–2 mm and 2–1 mm aggregate size classes was found to be equal for P2 and P4, with values ranging from 158.17 ± 24.70 kPa to 148.04 ± 38.50 kPa in the 4–2 mm class, and from 459.51 ± 189 kPa to 328.35 ± 78.22 kPa in the 2–1 mm one. The SSI was found to be inadequate for evaluating the structural stability of the Oxisols. In general, SOC was found to be the main stabilizing agent of larger aggregates, while clay mineral composition determined the stability of smaller aggregates. Goethite associated with gibbsite was more effective in increasing the structural stability of P2 and P4. Furthermore, kaolinites with low crystallinity, which are found in clayey Oxisols, resulted in a high specific surface area, particularly in Rhodic Haplustox and Typic Hapludox soils, which promoted more interactions with other clay minerals (e.g., goethite and gibbsite) and SOC, thereby increasing the tensile strength in these Oxisols. In fact, the formation and stabilization of aggregates in highly weathered soils depends on several factors, but the influence of clay mineral composition stands out as the most pronounced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article e00837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424000841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil aggregation controls several physical, chemical, and biological processes. Soil organic matter (SOM) and its stabilizing agents are regarded as the most important factors driving formation and stabilization of soil aggregates. However, aggregate stability in highly weathered soils may also be related to clay mineral composition and soil chemical properties. This study aims to evaluate the processes controlling soil aggregate stability and to understand the influence of soil chemical and clay mineral composition on the structural stability of highly weathered soils. Four Brazilian Oxisols were investigated: (P1) Xanthic Kandiustox, (P2) Rhodic Haplustox, (P3) Anionic Acrustox, and (P4) Typic Hapludox. Undisturbed and disturbed soil samples were collected from the Bw horizon under a native forest. Soil structural stability was evaluated using a variety of techniques and indices, including mean weight diameter (MWD) by hydraulic stress, mechanically-dispersible clay (MDC) by turbidimetry, tensile strength (TS) by crushing aggregates, and soil structural stability index (SSI) taking into account soil organic carbon (SOC). In general, P1 exhibited the highest MDC content (3.05 ± 0.54, Nephelometric Turbidity Unit, NTU/g L‐−1), while P4 had the highest MWD (10.26 ± 0.24 mm) and the highest TS (80.42 ± 18.54 kPa) within the 8–4 mm aggregate size class. The TS for the 4–2 mm and 2–1 mm aggregate size classes was found to be equal for P2 and P4, with values ranging from 158.17 ± 24.70 kPa to 148.04 ± 38.50 kPa in the 4–2 mm class, and from 459.51 ± 189 kPa to 328.35 ± 78.22 kPa in the 2–1 mm one. The SSI was found to be inadequate for evaluating the structural stability of the Oxisols. In general, SOC was found to be the main stabilizing agent of larger aggregates, while clay mineral composition determined the stability of smaller aggregates. Goethite associated with gibbsite was more effective in increasing the structural stability of P2 and P4. Furthermore, kaolinites with low crystallinity, which are found in clayey Oxisols, resulted in a high specific surface area, particularly in Rhodic Haplustox and Typic Hapludox soils, which promoted more interactions with other clay minerals (e.g., goethite and gibbsite) and SOC, thereby increasing the tensile strength in these Oxisols. In fact, the formation and stabilization of aggregates in highly weathered soils depends on several factors, but the influence of clay mineral composition stands out as the most pronounced.

Abstract Image

粘土矿物成分推动了巴西 Oxisols 的土壤结构行为和相关物理特性
土壤团聚控制着多个物理、化学和生物过程。土壤有机质(SOM)及其稳定剂被认为是推动土壤团聚体形成和稳定的最重要因素。然而,高度风化土壤中的团聚体稳定性也可能与粘土矿物成分和土壤化学性质有关。本研究旨在评估控制土壤团聚体稳定性的过程,并了解土壤化学成分和粘土矿物成分对高度风化土壤结构稳定性的影响。研究了四种巴西氧化物土壤:(P1)Xanthic Kandiustox、(P2)Rhodic Haplustox、(P3)Anionic Acrustox 和(P4)Typic Hapludox。未受扰动和受扰动的土壤样本取自原生林下的 Bw 层。采用多种技术和指数对土壤结构稳定性进行了评估,包括通过水压力测定的平均重量直径(MWD)、通过浊度测定法测定的机械可分散粘土(MDC)、通过压碎骨料测定的抗拉强度(TS)以及考虑到土壤有机碳(SOC)的土壤结构稳定性指数(SSI)。总体而言,P1 的 MDC 含量最高(3.05 ± 0.54,浊度单位,NTU/g L--1),而 P4 的 MWD(10.26 ± 0.24 mm)和 TS(80.42 ± 18.54 kPa)在 8-4 mm 集料粒度等级中最高。在 4-2 毫米和 2-1 毫米骨料粒度等级中,P2 和 P4 的 TS 值相等,4-2 毫米等级的 TS 值从 158.17 ± 24.70 kPa 到 148.04 ± 38.50 kPa 不等,2-1 毫米等级的 TS 值从 459.51 ± 189 kPa 到 328.35 ± 78.22 kPa 不等。SSI 不足以评估氧化物土壤的结构稳定性。一般来说,SOC 是较大聚集体的主要稳定剂,而粘土矿物成分则决定了较小聚集体的稳定性。在提高 P2 和 P4 的结构稳定性方面,与辉绿岩伴生的高岭土更为有效。此外,粘土质 Oxisols 中的低结晶度高岭土具有较高的比表面积,特别是在 Rhodic Haplustox 和 Typic Hapludox 土壤中,这促进了与其他粘土矿物(如网纹石和长臂石)和 SOC 的相互作用,从而提高了这些 Oxisols 的抗拉强度。事实上,高度风化土壤中聚集体的形成和稳定取决于多种因素,但粘土矿物成分的影响最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信