The effect of neurolinguistic programming and progressive muscle relaxation exercises on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy: A randomized controlled trial

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Ayşegül Kiliçli , Sidar Gül
{"title":"The effect of neurolinguistic programming and progressive muscle relaxation exercises on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Ayşegül Kiliçli ,&nbsp;Sidar Gül","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This research was to determine the effect of neurolinguistic programming (NLP) and progressive muscle relaxation exercises (PMRE) on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy in primiparous women after cesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This is a single-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Data were collected between 01 October 2023, and 18 December 2023. The sample of the study consisted of 99 primiparous women who gave birth by cesarean section (NLP=33, PMRE=33, and control=33). Women were randomly assigned to the groups. Starting from the first mobilization time after cesarean section, NLP was applied to the NLP group and PMRE was applied to the PMRE group every eight hours for 48 h. In the control group, NLP or PMRE was not applied and the women were allowed to rest on their backs. The primary outcomes of the study were breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean scores of breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy measured over time were highest in the NLP group and lowest in the control group (<em>p</em>&lt;.05). The mean scores of breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy measured over time increased by 78.4 %, and 97.7 %, respectively, in the NLP group compared to the control group, 74.7 %, and 88.1 %, in the PMRE group compared to the control group, and 13.5 %, and 90.2 %, respectively, in the NLP group compared to the PMRE group (<em>p&lt;.05</em>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NLP intervention may have a more positive effect on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy than PMRE intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Trial and protocol registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06070792.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":"20 5","pages":"Article 103027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This research was to determine the effect of neurolinguistic programming (NLP) and progressive muscle relaxation exercises (PMRE) on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy in primiparous women after cesarean section.

Material and methods

This is a single-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Data were collected between 01 October 2023, and 18 December 2023. The sample of the study consisted of 99 primiparous women who gave birth by cesarean section (NLP=33, PMRE=33, and control=33). Women were randomly assigned to the groups. Starting from the first mobilization time after cesarean section, NLP was applied to the NLP group and PMRE was applied to the PMRE group every eight hours for 48 h. In the control group, NLP or PMRE was not applied and the women were allowed to rest on their backs. The primary outcomes of the study were breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy.

Results

The mean scores of breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy measured over time were highest in the NLP group and lowest in the control group (p<.05). The mean scores of breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy measured over time increased by 78.4 %, and 97.7 %, respectively, in the NLP group compared to the control group, 74.7 %, and 88.1 %, in the PMRE group compared to the control group, and 13.5 %, and 90.2 %, respectively, in the NLP group compared to the PMRE group (p<.05).

Conclusion

NLP intervention may have a more positive effect on breastfeeding success and breastfeeding self-efficacy than PMRE intervention.

Trial and protocol registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06070792.

神经语言程序设计和渐进式肌肉放松练习对母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能感的影响:随机对照试验
引言本研究旨在确定神经语言程式学(NLP)和渐进式肌肉放松练习(PMRE)对剖腹产后初产妇母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能的影响。数据收集时间为 2023 年 10 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 18 日。研究样本包括99名通过剖腹产分娩的初产妇(NLP=33人,PMRE=33人,对照组=33人)。产妇被随机分配到各组。从剖腹产后的第一次动员开始,NLP 组每八小时进行一次 NLP,PMRE 组每八小时进行一次 PMRE,持续 48 小时。研究的主要结果是母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能。结果NLP组的母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能随时间变化的平均得分最高,对照组最低(p< .05)。与对照组相比,NLP 组的母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能随时间推移的平均得分分别提高了 78.4% 和 97.7%;与对照组相比,PMRE 组的母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能随时间推移的平均得分分别提高了 74.7% 和 88.1%;与 NLP 组相比,PMRE 组的母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能随时间推移的平均得分分别提高了 13.5% 和 90.2%。结论NLP干预可能比PMRE干预对母乳喂养成功率和母乳喂养自我效能产生更积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
179
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信