{"title":"Differential response of roots and leaves to combined heat and salinity stresses in tomato plants","authors":"Tania Mesa , Alejandra Romero , Sergi Munné-Bosch","doi":"10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite our understanding of plant responses to single stresses, knowledge on how plants respond to combined abiotic factors and the underlying hormonal regulation is still very limited. Here, we aimed to examine the plant response to combined heat and salt stresses in tomato plants, the underlying hormonal response and the effectiveness of methyl jasmonate application in its alleviation. We measured fruit production and various stress markers in both roots and leaves, together with endogenous contents of stress-related phytohormones (including abscisic acid, salicylic acid and jasmonates) in tomato plants (<em>Solanum lycopersicum</em> cv. Micro-Tom), exposed to combined stress. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of a methyl jasmonate treatment as a priming agent to alleviate the negative effects of stress, with an emphasis on evaluating the effects of this hormone on triggering antioxidant protection by enhancement of vitamin E contents. Plants responded differently to combined stress treatment than to single stresses, but this differential response was organ-specific, with roots being more sensitive to stress than leaves. Both abscisic acid and jasmonates were involved in the plant response to combined stress but leaves and roots responded differently. Furthermore, abscisic acid and jasmonates correlated with vitamin E accumulation, most particularly in roots. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate at the flowering stage in plants challenged with combined stress did not improve fruit production but resulted in enhanced vitamin E accumulation in leaves. It is concluded that (i) roots and leaves show a differential sensitivity to both single and combined heat and salt stresses, (ii) the response of abscisic acid and jasmonates in plant stress responses seems to be markedly organ dependent, and (iii) foliar methyl jasmonate increased vitamin E accumulation under combined stress in tomato plants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11758,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Experimental Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009884722400248X/pdfft?md5=90bb842d2cf1b351ddea5a6237fd9e9f&pid=1-s2.0-S009884722400248X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009884722400248X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite our understanding of plant responses to single stresses, knowledge on how plants respond to combined abiotic factors and the underlying hormonal regulation is still very limited. Here, we aimed to examine the plant response to combined heat and salt stresses in tomato plants, the underlying hormonal response and the effectiveness of methyl jasmonate application in its alleviation. We measured fruit production and various stress markers in both roots and leaves, together with endogenous contents of stress-related phytohormones (including abscisic acid, salicylic acid and jasmonates) in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom), exposed to combined stress. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of a methyl jasmonate treatment as a priming agent to alleviate the negative effects of stress, with an emphasis on evaluating the effects of this hormone on triggering antioxidant protection by enhancement of vitamin E contents. Plants responded differently to combined stress treatment than to single stresses, but this differential response was organ-specific, with roots being more sensitive to stress than leaves. Both abscisic acid and jasmonates were involved in the plant response to combined stress but leaves and roots responded differently. Furthermore, abscisic acid and jasmonates correlated with vitamin E accumulation, most particularly in roots. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate at the flowering stage in plants challenged with combined stress did not improve fruit production but resulted in enhanced vitamin E accumulation in leaves. It is concluded that (i) roots and leaves show a differential sensitivity to both single and combined heat and salt stresses, (ii) the response of abscisic acid and jasmonates in plant stress responses seems to be markedly organ dependent, and (iii) foliar methyl jasmonate increased vitamin E accumulation under combined stress in tomato plants.
尽管我们已经了解了植物对单一胁迫的反应,但对植物如何应对综合非生物因素及其潜在激素调控的了解仍然非常有限。在此,我们旨在研究番茄植物对热和盐联合胁迫的反应、潜在的激素反应以及施用茉莉酸甲酯对缓解胁迫的效果。我们测量了番茄植株(Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom)在综合胁迫下的果实产量、根部和叶片中的各种胁迫标记,以及与胁迫相关的植物激素(包括脱落酸、水杨酸和茉莉酸)的内源含量。此外,我们还评估了茉莉酸甲酯处理作为缓解胁迫负面影响的启动剂的有效性,重点是评估这种激素通过提高维生素 E 含量来触发抗氧化保护的效果。植物对综合胁迫处理的反应不同于对单一胁迫的反应,但这种不同反应是器官特异性的,根对胁迫比叶更敏感。脱落酸和茉莉酸都参与了植物对综合胁迫的反应,但叶片和根的反应不同。此外,脱落酸和茉莉酸盐与维生素 E 的积累有关,尤其是在根部。在综合胁迫植物的开花期叶面喷施茉莉酸甲酯并不能提高果实产量,但却能提高叶片中维生素 E 的积累。结论是:(i) 根和叶对单一胁迫以及热胁迫和盐胁迫表现出不同的敏感性;(ii) 脱落酸和茉莉酸盐在植物胁迫反应中的反应似乎明显依赖于器官;(iii) 叶面喷施茉莉酸甲酯可增加番茄植物在综合胁迫下的维生素 E 积累。
期刊介绍:
Environmental and Experimental Botany (EEB) publishes research papers on the physical, chemical, biological, molecular mechanisms and processes involved in the responses of plants to their environment.
In addition to research papers, the journal includes review articles. Submission is in agreement with the Editors-in-Chief.
The Journal also publishes special issues which are built by invited guest editors and are related to the main themes of EEB.
The areas covered by the Journal include:
(1) Responses of plants to heavy metals and pollutants
(2) Plant/water interactions (salinity, drought, flooding)
(3) Responses of plants to radiations ranging from UV-B to infrared
(4) Plant/atmosphere relations (ozone, CO2 , temperature)
(5) Global change impacts on plant ecophysiology
(6) Biotic interactions involving environmental factors.