Physical properties of microplastics affecting the aquatic biota: A review

Q2 Environmental Science
Naiara Casagrande , Francesca Verones , Paula Sobral , Graça Martinho
{"title":"Physical properties of microplastics affecting the aquatic biota: A review","authors":"Naiara Casagrande ,&nbsp;Francesca Verones ,&nbsp;Paula Sobral ,&nbsp;Graça Martinho","doi":"10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The physical properties of microplastics, such as size, type, polymer and chemical composition, affect their level of toxicity once ingested by aquatic species. Therefore, to be able to produce environmental relevant ecotoxicity data, laboratory tests should take these properties into consideration as well as in the calculation of effect factors for the Life Cycle Assessment methodology. In this study, we reviewed papers estimating ecotoxicity of microplastics ingested by species under laboratory conditions as well as data on microplastics ingested by species sampled from the field. This aims to identify the physical property of the plastics ingested and the influence on levels of ecotoxicity. Afterwards, our paper shows a mismatch between the physical properties ingested by the species sampled in the field and those tested for toxicity in laboratory studies. Regarding types, laboratory studies commonly expose aquatic species to regularly shaped particles such as microbeads and pellets (representing 72 %). For effect factors in LCA context, microbeads represent 88 % in number of datapoints. In contrast to this, irregularly shaped particles (e.g. fibres and fragments) are more frequently reported in the field, representing 85 % of the ingested microplastics. At the same time, regarding size, most of the laboratory studies examine microplastics and there is a lack of toxicity data for nano sized particles. A mismatch is also reported on the polymers; Polypropylene, Polyethylene and Polyester represented a total of 45 % of the samples detected in the field, while Polyethylene and Polystyrene represent 69 % in ecotoxicity studies and 78 % in effect factors. These mismatches shows that physical properties prevalent ingested by the species still lack data on levels of ecotoxicity as well as in number of data points in the LCA context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34473,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Advances","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266676572400084X/pdfft?md5=faba8a27fd1c22ee437ae0857feaf2a5&pid=1-s2.0-S266676572400084X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266676572400084X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The physical properties of microplastics, such as size, type, polymer and chemical composition, affect their level of toxicity once ingested by aquatic species. Therefore, to be able to produce environmental relevant ecotoxicity data, laboratory tests should take these properties into consideration as well as in the calculation of effect factors for the Life Cycle Assessment methodology. In this study, we reviewed papers estimating ecotoxicity of microplastics ingested by species under laboratory conditions as well as data on microplastics ingested by species sampled from the field. This aims to identify the physical property of the plastics ingested and the influence on levels of ecotoxicity. Afterwards, our paper shows a mismatch between the physical properties ingested by the species sampled in the field and those tested for toxicity in laboratory studies. Regarding types, laboratory studies commonly expose aquatic species to regularly shaped particles such as microbeads and pellets (representing 72 %). For effect factors in LCA context, microbeads represent 88 % in number of datapoints. In contrast to this, irregularly shaped particles (e.g. fibres and fragments) are more frequently reported in the field, representing 85 % of the ingested microplastics. At the same time, regarding size, most of the laboratory studies examine microplastics and there is a lack of toxicity data for nano sized particles. A mismatch is also reported on the polymers; Polypropylene, Polyethylene and Polyester represented a total of 45 % of the samples detected in the field, while Polyethylene and Polystyrene represent 69 % in ecotoxicity studies and 78 % in effect factors. These mismatches shows that physical properties prevalent ingested by the species still lack data on levels of ecotoxicity as well as in number of data points in the LCA context.

影响水生生物群的微塑料的物理特性:综述
微塑料的物理特性,如尺寸、类型、聚合物和化学成分,会影响其被水生物种摄入后的毒性水平。因此,为了得出与环境相关的生态毒性数据,实验室测试应考虑到这些特性,并在计算生命周期评估方法的影响因子时加以考虑。在本研究中,我们回顾了在实验室条件下估算物种摄入微塑料的生态毒性的论文,以及从野外采样的物种摄入微塑料的数据。这样做的目的是确定摄入塑料的物理特性及其对生态毒性水平的影响。随后,我们的论文显示,在野外采样的物种摄入的物理特性与实验室研究中毒性测试的物理特性不匹配。在类型方面,实验室研究通常会让水生物种接触到形状规则的微粒,如微珠和颗粒(占 72%)。就生命周期评估中的影响因素而言,微珠占数据点数量的 88%。与此相反,形状不规则的微粒(如纤维和碎片)在实地报告中更为常见,占摄入微塑料的 85%。同时,在尺寸方面,大多数实验室研究都是对微塑料进行检测,而缺乏纳米尺寸颗粒的毒性数据。在聚合物方面也存在不匹配的情况:聚丙烯、聚乙烯和聚酯共占现场检测到的样本的 45%,而聚乙烯和聚苯乙烯在生态毒性研究中占 69%,在效应因子中占 78%。这些不匹配现象表明,在生命周期评估中,物种摄入的物理性质仍然缺乏有关生态毒性水平和数据点数量的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Advances
Environmental Advances Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信