A new stress measurement strategy based on time-frequency characteristics of Lamb waves

IF 3.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Hexin Cui , Zhichun Zhang , Hongbo Jia , Jiaze He , Yanju Liu , Jinsong Leng
{"title":"A new stress measurement strategy based on time-frequency characteristics of Lamb waves","authors":"Hexin Cui ,&nbsp;Zhichun Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongbo Jia ,&nbsp;Jiaze He ,&nbsp;Yanju Liu ,&nbsp;Jinsong Leng","doi":"10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing stress evaluation methods based on the Lamb waves mainly use the time of flight (TOF) or velocity as the means of stress measurement. However, these two features used for stress measurement are sometimes insensitive to stress changes. Therefore, it is essential to explore other features that are potentially more sensitive to stress changes. The time–frequency spectrums of signals containing stress information have not yet been fully studied for stress evaluation. This paper proposes a uniaxial stress measurement method based on two time–frequency characteristics of Lamb waves, i.e., the slope of time–frequency spectrum distribution (TFSD) and pulse width impact factor. Theoretical expressions of the slope of TFSD are derived. The impacts of excitation signal parameters (i.e., bandwidth and center frequency) and noise on two time–frequency characteristics were discussed. Then, the fitting results of the finite element simulation are consistent with the results predicted by theory. To experimentally validate the proposed theory, aluminum plate specimens with two different types of adhesives were used for the experiment. According to the experimental stress measurement expression, three uniaxial tensile tests in the range of 35–95 MPa were conducted on the identical batch of specimens. The maximum standard deviation of multiple measured stress based on pulse width impact factor is 3.76433 MPa, demonstrating excellent measurement stability. The maximum standard deviation of multiple measured stress based on the slope of TFSD is 9.12492 MPa. It shows that the proposed methodology is a promising alternative for stress measurement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23522,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 107393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X24001562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing stress evaluation methods based on the Lamb waves mainly use the time of flight (TOF) or velocity as the means of stress measurement. However, these two features used for stress measurement are sometimes insensitive to stress changes. Therefore, it is essential to explore other features that are potentially more sensitive to stress changes. The time–frequency spectrums of signals containing stress information have not yet been fully studied for stress evaluation. This paper proposes a uniaxial stress measurement method based on two time–frequency characteristics of Lamb waves, i.e., the slope of time–frequency spectrum distribution (TFSD) and pulse width impact factor. Theoretical expressions of the slope of TFSD are derived. The impacts of excitation signal parameters (i.e., bandwidth and center frequency) and noise on two time–frequency characteristics were discussed. Then, the fitting results of the finite element simulation are consistent with the results predicted by theory. To experimentally validate the proposed theory, aluminum plate specimens with two different types of adhesives were used for the experiment. According to the experimental stress measurement expression, three uniaxial tensile tests in the range of 35–95 MPa were conducted on the identical batch of specimens. The maximum standard deviation of multiple measured stress based on pulse width impact factor is 3.76433 MPa, demonstrating excellent measurement stability. The maximum standard deviation of multiple measured stress based on the slope of TFSD is 9.12492 MPa. It shows that the proposed methodology is a promising alternative for stress measurement.

基于 Lamb 波时频特征的新型应力测量策略
现有的基于 Lamb 波的应力评估方法主要使用飞行时间(TOF)或速度作为应力测量手段。然而,这两种用于应力测量的特征有时对应力变化不敏感。因此,有必要探索对应力变化更敏感的其他特征。目前尚未对包含应力信息的信号时频谱进行充分研究,以用于应力评估。本文提出了一种基于 Lamb 波的两个时频特征(即时频谱分布斜率 (TFSD) 和脉冲宽度影响因子)的单轴应力测量方法。推导出了 TFSD 斜坡的理论表达式。讨论了激励信号参数(即带宽和中心频率)和噪声对两个时频特性的影响。然后,有限元模拟的拟合结果与理论预测的结果一致。为了从实验上验证所提出的理论,实验采用了两种不同粘合剂的铝板试样。根据实验应力测量表达式,在同一批试样上进行了三次 35-95 兆帕范围内的单轴拉伸试验。基于脉冲宽度影响因子的多次测量应力的最大标准偏差为 3.76433 兆帕,显示出良好的测量稳定性。基于 TFSD 斜率的多重测量应力最大标准偏差为 9.12492 MPa。这表明所提出的方法是一种很有前途的应力测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasonics is the only internationally established journal which covers the entire field of ultrasound research and technology and all its many applications. Ultrasonics contains a variety of sections to keep readers fully informed and up-to-date on the whole spectrum of research and development throughout the world. Ultrasonics publishes papers of exceptional quality and of relevance to both academia and industry. Manuscripts in which ultrasonics is a central issue and not simply an incidental tool or minor issue, are welcomed. As well as top quality original research papers and review articles by world renowned experts, Ultrasonics also regularly features short communications, a calendar of forthcoming events and special issues dedicated to topical subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信