Hydraulic conditions created by a ‘large’ diameter Cylindrical Bristle Cluster fish pass

Abstract

Cylindrical Bristle Clusters (CBCs) provide a multi-species fish passage solution at sloped weirs. Configurations trialled to date (min. diagonal spacing between CBCs up to 0.17 m) were designed to facilitate passage of relatively small (e.g. < 30 cm) potamodromous species and may hamper the movements of larger bodied (e.g. > 40 cm) fishes, such as adult anadromous salmonids. Therefore, in this study, the hydraulic conditions created by an array of large diameter (0.13 m) CBCs positioned farther apart than in previous studies (min. diagonal spacing 0.29 m) was assessed to determine whether conditions would be suitable for facilitating the passage of small-bodied fish while also providing sufficient space for larger individuals to manoeuvre. Two experiments were conducted in an open channel flume. Experiment 1 quantified the hydraulic conditions created by a model Crump weir when unmodified and with CBCs installed in supercritical flow (Fr 1.23–3.01) on the 1:5 downstream sloping face under a low (0.08 m³ s⁻¹) and high (0.23 m³ s⁻¹) discharge. Patches of low water velocity were created in the wake of the CBCs, and the median (time and space averaged) velocity was reduced under both low (30.1%) and high (22.3%) discharge. Based on estimated burst swimming speeds of two common European species, the roach (Rutilus rutilus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) (0.16 m long, swimming at 15.1 °C), this reduction in velocity would facilitate upstream passage. Experiment 2 documented the vertical velocity profile and shear stress characteristics (a measure of turbulence) within the CBC array. Unlike in Experiment 1, the CBCs were installed on the flat base of the flume and under subcritical flow (Fr = 0.31) to generate sufficient water depth. The velocity was reduced (up to 22.5%) at depths that did not exceed (> 2 cm above) the height of the bristles. Above these depths, velocity was (up to 14.6%) higher compared to open channel conditions upstream of the CBC array and a vertical shear layer was evident. As the main hydraulic benefits of CBCs occur at depths that do not exceed the bristles, their height should be tailored to site specific conditions (e.g. size of target fish species and/or depth of water at infrastructure). Field-based research is needed to determine velocity reduction at longer weirs and under a wider range of flows than can be tested under flume conditions. How the hydraulic characteristics of submerged CBCs differ from those described here with those that occur in the field when installed on a steep sloping weir under supercritical flow should be further investigated.