Comparison of inactivation characteristics of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in water by rotary plasma jet sterilization

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tao Zhu, Shunjiang Fu, Wei Xie, Furong Li, Yusheng Liu
{"title":"Comparison of inactivation characteristics of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in water by rotary plasma jet sterilization","authors":"Tao Zhu,&nbsp;Shunjiang Fu,&nbsp;Wei Xie,&nbsp;Furong Li,&nbsp;Yusheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to investigate the differential inactivation responses of <em>Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> under rotary plasma jet conditions. Initially, we examined the antimicrobial effects of the rotary plasma jet on the two microorganisms under various operational parameters. Under optimal conditions (power: 1000 W, frequency: 30 kHz, flow rate: 45 NL/min, height: 4 cm, duration: 70 s), the treatment achieved an impressive 99.9 % inactivation of both bacterial strains. Notably, <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> exhibited more excellent resistance when compared to <em>Escherichia coli</em>. Subsequently, we delved into changes in cell viability, cell granularity, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels before and after rotary spray plasma jet treatment to explore the differential inactivation mechanisms of the two microbial species. Cell viability assessments unveiled reduced viable cells and increased occurrence of dead cells and late-stage apoptotic cells for both microbial types, potentially attributed to augmented cell permeability and damage. Compared to <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Escherichia coli</em> exhibited notable enhancements in forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) cell granularity detection signals yet displayed lower intracellular ROS levels. This discrepancy suggests that the primary cause of <em>Escherichia coli</em> inactivation may be cell envelope disruption. In contrast, Excessive intracellular ROS accumulation could be responsible for the inactivation of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103746"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002220/pdfft?md5=d2ab60e24c45c5e825d8319d7d1b65fd&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424002220-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the differential inactivation responses of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus under rotary plasma jet conditions. Initially, we examined the antimicrobial effects of the rotary plasma jet on the two microorganisms under various operational parameters. Under optimal conditions (power: 1000 W, frequency: 30 kHz, flow rate: 45 NL/min, height: 4 cm, duration: 70 s), the treatment achieved an impressive 99.9 % inactivation of both bacterial strains. Notably, Staphylococcus aureus exhibited more excellent resistance when compared to Escherichia coli. Subsequently, we delved into changes in cell viability, cell granularity, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels before and after rotary spray plasma jet treatment to explore the differential inactivation mechanisms of the two microbial species. Cell viability assessments unveiled reduced viable cells and increased occurrence of dead cells and late-stage apoptotic cells for both microbial types, potentially attributed to augmented cell permeability and damage. Compared to Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli exhibited notable enhancements in forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) cell granularity detection signals yet displayed lower intracellular ROS levels. This discrepancy suggests that the primary cause of Escherichia coli inactivation may be cell envelope disruption. In contrast, Excessive intracellular ROS accumulation could be responsible for the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus.

Abstract Image

比较旋转等离子射流灭菌法对水中大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的灭活特性
本研究旨在探讨旋转等离子射流条件下大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的不同灭活反应。首先,我们考察了旋转等离子体射流在不同操作参数下对这两种微生物的抗菌效果。在最佳条件下(功率:1000 W,频率:30 kHz,流速:45 NL/min,高度:4.5 mL/min),等离子体喷射器可对两种微生物产生抗菌作用:45 NL/分钟,高度:4 厘米,持续时间:70 秒)的情况下,处理效果达到了最佳:70 秒),两种细菌菌株的灭活率均达到 99.9%。值得注意的是,与大肠杆菌相比,金黄色葡萄球菌表现出更强的耐药性。随后,我们深入研究了旋转喷雾等离子喷射处理前后细胞活力、细胞颗粒度和细胞内活性氧(ROS)水平的变化,以探索两种微生物的不同灭活机制。细胞存活率评估显示,两种微生物的存活细胞减少,死细胞和晚期凋亡细胞增加,这可能是由于细胞渗透性和损伤增加所致。与金黄色葡萄球菌相比,大肠杆菌的前向散射(FSC)和侧向散射(SSC)细胞粒度检测信号明显增强,但细胞内 ROS 水平较低。这一差异表明,大肠杆菌失活的主要原因可能是细胞膜破坏。相反,细胞内 ROS 积累过多可能是导致金黄色葡萄球菌失活的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信