Multivariate pattern analysis of cooperation and competition in constructive action

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
G.G. Knyazev , A.N. Savostyanov , A.V. Bocharov , P.D. Rudych , A.E. Saprigyn
{"title":"Multivariate pattern analysis of cooperation and competition in constructive action","authors":"G.G. Knyazev ,&nbsp;A.N. Savostyanov ,&nbsp;A.V. Bocharov ,&nbsp;P.D. Rudych ,&nbsp;A.E. Saprigyn","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The neural underpinning of cooperative and competitive constructive activity has been investigated using mass-univariate approaches. In this study, we sought to compare the results of these approaches with the results of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). In particular, we wanted to test whether MVPA supports the claim made in previous studies that cooperation is associated with the activity of reward-related brain circuits. Participants were required to construct a pattern on the screen either individually or in cooperation or competition with another person during an fMRI scan. Both the MVPA classification methods and the representational similarity analysis indicated the involvement of orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal areas in processes that distinguish between cooperation and competition, and activation analysis showed that these areas are more active during cooperation than during competition. However, a single trial analysis showed that the effect was reversed when only winning trials were considered. In these trials, activation of reward-related areas was higher during competition than during cooperation. Moreover, the contrast between won and lost trials in terms of reward circuits involvement was sharper under competition than under cooperation. Thus, although cooperation can be generally more rewarding than competition, it is associated with smaller difference between trials lost and trials won in terms of reward circuits activation. One may speculate that in cooperation, victory and defeat are shared with the partner and, contrary to competition, are not experienced as personal achievement or failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neural underpinning of cooperative and competitive constructive activity has been investigated using mass-univariate approaches. In this study, we sought to compare the results of these approaches with the results of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). In particular, we wanted to test whether MVPA supports the claim made in previous studies that cooperation is associated with the activity of reward-related brain circuits. Participants were required to construct a pattern on the screen either individually or in cooperation or competition with another person during an fMRI scan. Both the MVPA classification methods and the representational similarity analysis indicated the involvement of orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal areas in processes that distinguish between cooperation and competition, and activation analysis showed that these areas are more active during cooperation than during competition. However, a single trial analysis showed that the effect was reversed when only winning trials were considered. In these trials, activation of reward-related areas was higher during competition than during cooperation. Moreover, the contrast between won and lost trials in terms of reward circuits involvement was sharper under competition than under cooperation. Thus, although cooperation can be generally more rewarding than competition, it is associated with smaller difference between trials lost and trials won in terms of reward circuits activation. One may speculate that in cooperation, victory and defeat are shared with the partner and, contrary to competition, are not experienced as personal achievement or failure.

对建设性行动中的合作与竞争进行多变量模式分析。
合作性和竞争性建构活动的神经基础已通过大规模单变量方法进行了研究。在本研究中,我们试图将这些方法的结果与多元模式分析(MVPA)的结果进行比较。特别是,我们想测试 MVPA 是否支持之前研究中的说法,即合作与奖励相关的大脑回路活动有关。在进行 fMRI 扫描时,参与者需要单独或与他人合作或竞争在屏幕上构建一个图案。MVPA 分类方法和表象相似性分析都表明,眶额叶和腹内侧前额叶区域参与了区分合作与竞争的过程,激活分析表明,这些区域在合作时比竞争时更活跃。然而,单次试验分析表明,如果只考虑获胜的试验,效果则相反。在这些试验中,与奖励相关的区域在竞争时比在合作时更活跃。此外,就奖赏回路的参与程度而言,获胜试验和失败试验之间的反差在竞争时比在合作时更明显。因此,虽然合作的奖赏一般比竞争的奖赏高,但就奖赏回路激活而言,失败的试验和成功的试验之间的差异较小。我们可以推测,在合作中,胜利和失败都是与伙伴分享的,与竞争相反,胜利和失败并不被视为个人的成就或失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信