Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kaleb C Esplin, Yi-Wen Tsai, Kathryn Vela, Anibal Diogenes, Lea El Hachem, Archontia Palaiologou, David L Cochran, Georgios A Kotsakis
{"title":"Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.","authors":"Kaleb C Esplin, Yi-Wen Tsai, Kathryn Vela, Anibal Diogenes, Lea El Hachem, Archontia Palaiologou, David L Cochran, Georgios A Kotsakis","doi":"10.1002/JPER.23-0573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared titanium and zirconia implant ligature-induced peri-implant defect progression and response to regenerative surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight tissue-level endosseous implants were placed in 6 mixed-breed foxhounds, with 2 zirconia and 2 titanium alternating in each hemimandible. Cotton ligatures were placed subgingivally for 16 weeks followed by 8 weeks of spontaneous progression. Standardized radiographs were captured every 2 weeks to evaluate the rate of bone loss. Regenerative surgery was performed utilizing water-jet decontamination, enamel matrix derivative, and locally harvested autogenous bone. After 16 weeks of healing, final radiographic bone levels as well as probing depths, recession, and clinical attachment levels were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 48 implants integrated successfully. The final average post-ligature radiographic defects were 2.88 and 3.05 mm for titanium and zirconia implants, respectively. There was no significant difference between materials in the rate of radiographic bone loss (p = 0.09). Following regenerative surgery, the total average amount of radiographic bone gain was 1.41 and 1.20 mm for titanium and zirconia, respectively. The percentage of defect fill was 51.56% and 37.98% (p = 0.03) for titanium and zirconia, respectively. Inter-group differences were minimal for clinical parameters at the time of sacrifice including periodontal pocket depths (p = 0.81), recession (p = 0.98), or clinical attachment levels (p = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was found in the rate of peri-implant defect development between titanium and zirconia implants. Both materials gained significant radiographic bone following regenerative surgery with significantly greater defect percentage fill in titanium implants. The final clinical parameters were similar in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.23-0573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared titanium and zirconia implant ligature-induced peri-implant defect progression and response to regenerative surgical intervention.

Methods: Eight tissue-level endosseous implants were placed in 6 mixed-breed foxhounds, with 2 zirconia and 2 titanium alternating in each hemimandible. Cotton ligatures were placed subgingivally for 16 weeks followed by 8 weeks of spontaneous progression. Standardized radiographs were captured every 2 weeks to evaluate the rate of bone loss. Regenerative surgery was performed utilizing water-jet decontamination, enamel matrix derivative, and locally harvested autogenous bone. After 16 weeks of healing, final radiographic bone levels as well as probing depths, recession, and clinical attachment levels were assessed.

Results: All 48 implants integrated successfully. The final average post-ligature radiographic defects were 2.88 and 3.05 mm for titanium and zirconia implants, respectively. There was no significant difference between materials in the rate of radiographic bone loss (p = 0.09). Following regenerative surgery, the total average amount of radiographic bone gain was 1.41 and 1.20 mm for titanium and zirconia, respectively. The percentage of defect fill was 51.56% and 37.98% (p = 0.03) for titanium and zirconia, respectively. Inter-group differences were minimal for clinical parameters at the time of sacrifice including periodontal pocket depths (p = 0.81), recession (p = 0.98), or clinical attachment levels (p = 0.51).

Conclusions: No significant difference was found in the rate of peri-implant defect development between titanium and zirconia implants. Both materials gained significant radiographic bone following regenerative surgery with significantly greater defect percentage fill in titanium implants. The final clinical parameters were similar in both groups.

氧化锆与钛种植体周围的种植体周围炎诱导与缓解。
背景:本研究比较了钛和氧化锆种植体结扎引起的种植体周围缺损进展和对再生手术干预的反应:本研究比较了钛和氧化锆种植体结扎引起的种植体周围缺损进展以及对再生手术干预的反应:方法:在 6 只混种猎狐犬中植入 8 个组织水平的骨内种植体,每个半颌交替植入 2 个氧化锆和 2 个钛种植体。在龈下放置棉花结扎带 16 周,然后自发进行 8 周。每 2 周拍摄一次标准化 X 光片,以评估骨质流失率。利用喷水去污、釉质基质衍生物和当地采集的自体骨进行再生手术。愈合16周后,对最终的放射骨水平、探查深度、后退和临床附着水平进行评估:结果:所有 48 个种植体均成功整合。钛和氧化锆种植体最终的平均结扎后影像学缺损分别为 2.88 毫米和 3.05 毫米。不同材料的骨质流失率无明显差异(P = 0.09)。再生手术后,钛和氧化锆材料的放射骨增量总平均值分别为 1.41 毫米和 1.20 毫米。钛和氧化锆的缺损填充率分别为 51.56% 和 37.98%(p = 0.03)。牺牲时的临床参数,包括牙周袋深度(p = 0.81)、牙周退缩(p = 0.98)或临床附着水平(p = 0.51),组间差异极小:结论:钛和氧化锆种植体在种植体周围缺损发展率方面没有明显差异。两种材料在再生手术后都获得了明显的放射性骨量,但钛种植体的缺损填充率明显更高。两组的最终临床参数相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信