Comparative evaluation of craving, sleep quality, sexual function and quality of life in opioid use disorder patients in remission with buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance treatment

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zübeyde Güllü Türker, Ali Erdoğan, Buket Cinemre, Özmen Metin, Burak Kulaksızoğlu
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of craving, sleep quality, sexual function and quality of life in opioid use disorder patients in remission with buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance treatment","authors":"Zübeyde Güllü Türker,&nbsp;Ali Erdoğan,&nbsp;Buket Cinemre,&nbsp;Özmen Metin,&nbsp;Burak Kulaksızoğlu","doi":"10.1002/hup.2908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare opioid use disorder (OUD) patients who continue to use opioids and are in remission with buprenorphine-naloxone (B/N) in terms of some parameters and to evaluate the relationship between B/N dose and these parameters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We included 141 OUD patients in remission with B/N maintenance treatment for at least 6 months, 141 who still used opioids, and 141 healthy volunteers. Substance Craving Scale (SCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) were administered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PSQI scores and ASEX scores were higher in those who continued to use opiates than in OUD in remission, and in OUD in remission compared to controls. OUD patients with current opioid use also had lower SF-36 scores compared to both patients in remission and healthy controls. SCS, PSQI, ASEX, and SF-36 scores were similar when the three groups were examined based on the dosage of B/N (below 8, 8–15, and 16 mg/day and above) use in OUD in remission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Quality of life, craving, sleep and sexual functions improved significantly with B/N; however, these effects are not dependent on B/N dosage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13030,"journal":{"name":"Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hup.2908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To compare opioid use disorder (OUD) patients who continue to use opioids and are in remission with buprenorphine-naloxone (B/N) in terms of some parameters and to evaluate the relationship between B/N dose and these parameters.

Method

We included 141 OUD patients in remission with B/N maintenance treatment for at least 6 months, 141 who still used opioids, and 141 healthy volunteers. Substance Craving Scale (SCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) were administered.

Results

PSQI scores and ASEX scores were higher in those who continued to use opiates than in OUD in remission, and in OUD in remission compared to controls. OUD patients with current opioid use also had lower SF-36 scores compared to both patients in remission and healthy controls. SCS, PSQI, ASEX, and SF-36 scores were similar when the three groups were examined based on the dosage of B/N (below 8, 8–15, and 16 mg/day and above) use in OUD in remission.

Conclusions

Quality of life, craving, sleep and sexual functions improved significantly with B/N; however, these effects are not dependent on B/N dosage.

对丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮维持治疗缓解期阿片类药物使用障碍患者的渴求、睡眠质量、性功能和生活质量进行比较评估。
目的:比较继续使用阿片类药物和接受丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(B/N)治疗后病情缓解的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的一些参数,并评估 B/N 剂量与这些参数之间的关系:我们纳入了 141 名接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮维持治疗至少 6 个月的缓解期 OUD 患者、141 名仍在使用阿片类药物的患者和 141 名健康志愿者。对他们进行了药物渴求量表(SCS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、亚利桑那性经历量表(ASEX)和短表 36(SF-36)的测试:结果:与对照组相比,继续使用阿片类药物者的 PSQI 得分和 ASEX 得分高于病情缓解的 OUD 患者,而病情缓解的 OUD 患者的 PSQI 得分和 ASEX 得分也高于对照组。与缓解期患者和健康对照组相比,目前使用阿片类药物的 OUD 患者的 SF-36 评分也较低。根据缓解期OUD患者使用B/N的剂量(低于8毫克/天、8-15毫克/天和16毫克/天及以上)对三组患者进行检查时,SCS、PSQI、ASEX和SF-36评分相似:结论:服用 B/N 后,生活质量、渴求、睡眠和性功能均有明显改善;然而,这些效果并不取决于 B/N 的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental provides a forum for the evaluation of clinical and experimental research on both new and established psychotropic medicines. Experimental studies of other centrally active drugs, including herbal products, in clinical, social and psychological contexts, as well as clinical/scientific papers on drugs of abuse and drug dependency will also be considered. While the primary purpose of the Journal is to publish the results of clinical research, the results of animal studies relevant to human psychopharmacology are welcome. The following topics are of special interest to the editors and readers of the Journal: -All aspects of clinical psychopharmacology- Efficacy and safety studies of novel and standard psychotropic drugs- Studies of the adverse effects of psychotropic drugs- Effects of psychotropic drugs on normal physiological processes- Geriatric and paediatric psychopharmacology- Ethical and psychosocial aspects of drug use and misuse- Psychopharmacological aspects of sleep and chronobiology- Neuroimaging and psychoactive drugs- Phytopharmacology and psychoactive substances- Drug treatment of neurological disorders- Mechanisms of action of psychotropic drugs- Ethnopsychopharmacology- Pharmacogenetic aspects of mental illness and drug response- Psychometrics: psychopharmacological methods and experimental design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信