The dragonfly technique for trachea closure in temporary tracheostomies. Surgical steps and clinical results.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sante De Santis, Stefania Galassi, Jacopo Cambi
{"title":"The dragonfly technique for trachea closure in temporary tracheostomies. Surgical steps and clinical results.","authors":"Sante De Santis, Stefania Galassi, Jacopo Cambi","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08821-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a new suturing technique called Dragonfly for the closure of temporary tracheotomies. This technique involves placing two sutures during the tracheotomy procedure and leaving them loose and unknotted until the day of skin closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case control study. Monocentric study at a department of Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery at a tertiary centre in Italy. A total of 50 patients who underwent temporary tracheotomy between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on the trachea closure method: traditional closure with sutures placed during the skin closure procedure (Group A) and the Dragonfly technique (Group B). The incidence of tracheal stenosis by Computed Tomography (CT), granulation tissue formation, bleeding, procedure duration, patient discomfort were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of tracheal complications and tracheal stenosis was reduced in Group B (6%) compared to Group A (24%). Procedure times (3 min vs. 6 min) durations was significantly shorter. No patients had symptoms of tracheal stenosis at the end of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Dragonfly suturing technique is effective and safe for tracheotomy closure, reducing the incidence of tracheal stenosis and shortening hospitalization duration compared to the traditional method.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08821-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of a new suturing technique called Dragonfly for the closure of temporary tracheotomies. This technique involves placing two sutures during the tracheotomy procedure and leaving them loose and unknotted until the day of skin closure.

Methods: Retrospective case control study. Monocentric study at a department of Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery at a tertiary centre in Italy. A total of 50 patients who underwent temporary tracheotomy between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on the trachea closure method: traditional closure with sutures placed during the skin closure procedure (Group A) and the Dragonfly technique (Group B). The incidence of tracheal stenosis by Computed Tomography (CT), granulation tissue formation, bleeding, procedure duration, patient discomfort were evaluated.

Results: The incidence of tracheal complications and tracheal stenosis was reduced in Group B (6%) compared to Group A (24%). Procedure times (3 min vs. 6 min) durations was significantly shorter. No patients had symptoms of tracheal stenosis at the end of the procedures.

Conclusion: The Dragonfly suturing technique is effective and safe for tracheotomy closure, reducing the incidence of tracheal stenosis and shortening hospitalization duration compared to the traditional method.

Abstract Image

用于临时气管造口的气管闭合蜻蜓技术。手术步骤和临床效果。
目的:评估一种名为 "蜻蜓 "的新型缝合技术在关闭临时气管切开术中的有效性。该技术包括在气管切开术中缝合两针,直到皮肤缝合当天才松开打结:回顾性病例对照研究。在意大利一家三级医院的耳鼻喉科和头颈外科进行单中心研究。共有 50 名患者在 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受了临时气管切开术。根据气管闭合方法将患者分为两组:在皮肤闭合过程中缝合的传统闭合方法(A组)和蜻蜓技术(B组)。对计算机断层扫描(CT)显示的气管狭窄发生率、肉芽组织形成、出血、手术时间、患者不适感进行了评估:结果:与 A 组(24%)相比,B 组气管并发症和气管狭窄的发生率较低(6%)。手术时间(3 分钟对 6 分钟)明显缩短。手术结束时,没有患者出现气管狭窄症状:结论:与传统方法相比,蜻蜓缝合技术在气管切开缝合中既有效又安全,可降低气管狭窄的发生率,缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信