GC × GC-HRMS with complementary ionization methods in the suspect screening analysis of fragrance allergens: overwhelming or justified?

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s00216-024-05436-0
Dmitrii M Mazur, Vyacheslav B Artaev, Albert T Lebedev
{"title":"GC × GC-HRMS with complementary ionization methods in the suspect screening analysis of fragrance allergens: overwhelming or justified?","authors":"Dmitrii M Mazur, Vyacheslav B Artaev, Albert T Lebedev","doi":"10.1007/s00216-024-05436-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) allows for the analysis of complex samples, such as fragrances. However, identifying all the constituents in natural fragrance mixtures, especially allergens that need to be listed on product labels, is a significant challenge. This is primarily due to the high complexity of the sample and the fact that electron ionization, the most commonly used ionization method in GC-MS, produces numerous nonspecific fragment ions, often resulting in the absence or very low abundance of the molecular ion. These factors affect confidence in assigning the analyte. In this study, we demonstrate that the combination of GC × GC separation, with high mass resolution and accurate mass measurements, as well as chemical ionization in addition to traditional electron ionization, becomes an efficient tool for reliable qualitative analysis of a mixture containing 100 fragrance allergens, even when many of them are closely related species or isomers. The proposed approach expands the applicability of the comprehensive GC × GC-HRMS method, which includes complementary ionization techniques, from studies on anthropogenic priority pollutants and emerging contaminants to the analysis of natural products. Although targeted qualitative and quantitative analysis of allergens in the modern laboratories is well organized, GC × GC-HRMS, being a useful complement to routine quality control of volatile allergens in fragrances, definitely gives an additional contribution to the analytical cases when conventional 1D-GC-MS faces some problems or uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05436-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) allows for the analysis of complex samples, such as fragrances. However, identifying all the constituents in natural fragrance mixtures, especially allergens that need to be listed on product labels, is a significant challenge. This is primarily due to the high complexity of the sample and the fact that electron ionization, the most commonly used ionization method in GC-MS, produces numerous nonspecific fragment ions, often resulting in the absence or very low abundance of the molecular ion. These factors affect confidence in assigning the analyte. In this study, we demonstrate that the combination of GC × GC separation, with high mass resolution and accurate mass measurements, as well as chemical ionization in addition to traditional electron ionization, becomes an efficient tool for reliable qualitative analysis of a mixture containing 100 fragrance allergens, even when many of them are closely related species or isomers. The proposed approach expands the applicability of the comprehensive GC × GC-HRMS method, which includes complementary ionization techniques, from studies on anthropogenic priority pollutants and emerging contaminants to the analysis of natural products. Although targeted qualitative and quantitative analysis of allergens in the modern laboratories is well organized, GC × GC-HRMS, being a useful complement to routine quality control of volatile allergens in fragrances, definitely gives an additional contribution to the analytical cases when conventional 1D-GC-MS faces some problems or uncertainties.

Abstract Image

GC × GC-HRMS 与互补离子化方法在香料过敏原可疑筛选分析中的应用:不堪重负还是理直气壮?
现代气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)可以分析复杂的样品,如香料。然而,鉴定天然香料混合物中的所有成分,尤其是需要在产品标签上列出的过敏原,是一项巨大的挑战。这主要是由于样品的高度复杂性,以及 GC-MS 最常用的电离方法--电子电离会产生大量非特异性碎片离子,往往导致分子离子的缺失或丰度极低。这些因素都会影响确定分析物的可信度。在本研究中,我们证明了气相色谱×气相色谱分离法与高质 量分辨率和精确质量测量以及传统电子电离法之外的化学电离法的结合,是对含有 100 种香料过敏原的混合物进行可靠定性分析的有效工具,即使其中许多是密切相关的物种或异构体。所提出的方法扩展了包含互补电离技术的 GC × GC-HRMS 综合方法的适用范围,从人为重点污染物和新出现污染物的研究扩展到天然产品的分析。尽管现代实验室对过敏原进行有针对性的定性和定量分析是井然有序的,但 GC × GC-HRMS 作为香料中挥发性过敏原常规质量控制的有益补充,在传统的 1D-GC-MS 面临某些问题或不确定因素时,无疑能为分析案例做出额外的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信