Multimodal training protocols on unstable rather than stable surfaces better improve dynamic balance ability in older adults.

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alex Rizzato, Matteo Bozzato, Luca Rotundo, Giuseppe Zullo, Giuseppe De Vito, Antonio Paoli, Giuseppe Marcolin
{"title":"Multimodal training protocols on unstable rather than stable surfaces better improve dynamic balance ability in older adults.","authors":"Alex Rizzato, Matteo Bozzato, Luca Rotundo, Giuseppe Zullo, Giuseppe De Vito, Antonio Paoli, Giuseppe Marcolin","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00353-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been growing interest in using unstable devices in training protocols. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two multimodal exercise interventions (i.e., on stable and unstable surfaces) on dynamic balance control and lower limb strength in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two older adults were randomly assigned to two intervention groups (N = 20, stable group; N = 19, unstable group), and to a control group (N = 18). In this single-blinded randomized controlled study, the two intervention groups underwent a 12-week training program twice a week for 45 min, consisting of strength and balance exercises. The stable (ST) group performed the training program over stable surfaces, while the unstable (UNST) group over unstable surfaces. Dynamic balance was assessed by computing the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory while a driven movable platform induced an unexpected perturbation of the base of support. Specifically, we considered the following CoP-related parameters within a 2.5-s temporal window from the beginning of the perturbation: displacement (Area95), mean velocity (Unit Path), anterior-posterior first peak (FP), post perturbation variability (PPV), and maximal oscillations (ΔCoPMax). The dominant quadriceps strength was measured through an isometric maximal voluntary contraction on an instrumented chair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four out of five CoP-related parameters (i.e., Area95, Unit Path, ΔCoPMax, and PPV) significantly improved in the UNST group from a minimum of 14.28% (d = 0.44) to a maximum of 52.82% (d = 0.58). The ST group significantly improved only in two (i.e., ΔCoPMax, and PPV) out of five CoP-related parameters with an enhancement of 12.48% (d = 0.68) and 19.10% (d = 1.06). Both intervention groups increased the maximal isometric quadriceps strength (UNST:17.27%, d = 0.69; ST:22.29%, d = 0.98). The control group did not show changes in any of the parameters considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stable surfaces promoted faster increments of muscular strength. Unstable surfaces were more effective in enhancing dynamic balance efficiency. These findings suggested the employment of multimodal training on unstable rather than stable surfaces to potentially lower the incidence of falls in older adults.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05769361, retrospectively registered 13 March 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05769361?lat=45.3661864&lng=11.8209139&locStr=Padova,%20Italy&distance=50&page=11&rank=107 .</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"21 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11241999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00353-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been growing interest in using unstable devices in training protocols. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two multimodal exercise interventions (i.e., on stable and unstable surfaces) on dynamic balance control and lower limb strength in older adults.

Methods: Sixty-two older adults were randomly assigned to two intervention groups (N = 20, stable group; N = 19, unstable group), and to a control group (N = 18). In this single-blinded randomized controlled study, the two intervention groups underwent a 12-week training program twice a week for 45 min, consisting of strength and balance exercises. The stable (ST) group performed the training program over stable surfaces, while the unstable (UNST) group over unstable surfaces. Dynamic balance was assessed by computing the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory while a driven movable platform induced an unexpected perturbation of the base of support. Specifically, we considered the following CoP-related parameters within a 2.5-s temporal window from the beginning of the perturbation: displacement (Area95), mean velocity (Unit Path), anterior-posterior first peak (FP), post perturbation variability (PPV), and maximal oscillations (ΔCoPMax). The dominant quadriceps strength was measured through an isometric maximal voluntary contraction on an instrumented chair.

Results: Four out of five CoP-related parameters (i.e., Area95, Unit Path, ΔCoPMax, and PPV) significantly improved in the UNST group from a minimum of 14.28% (d = 0.44) to a maximum of 52.82% (d = 0.58). The ST group significantly improved only in two (i.e., ΔCoPMax, and PPV) out of five CoP-related parameters with an enhancement of 12.48% (d = 0.68) and 19.10% (d = 1.06). Both intervention groups increased the maximal isometric quadriceps strength (UNST:17.27%, d = 0.69; ST:22.29%, d = 0.98). The control group did not show changes in any of the parameters considered.

Conclusions: Stable surfaces promoted faster increments of muscular strength. Unstable surfaces were more effective in enhancing dynamic balance efficiency. These findings suggested the employment of multimodal training on unstable rather than stable surfaces to potentially lower the incidence of falls in older adults.

Trial registration: NCT05769361, retrospectively registered 13 March 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05769361?lat=45.3661864&lng=11.8209139&locStr=Padova,%20Italy&distance=50&page=11&rank=107 .

在不稳定而非稳定的表面上进行多模式训练,能更好地提高老年人的动态平衡能力。
背景:人们对在训练方案中使用不稳定装置的兴趣与日俱增。本研究旨在评估两种多模式运动干预(即在稳定和不稳定表面上)对老年人动态平衡控制和下肢力量的效果:62名老年人被随机分配到两个干预组(N = 20,稳定组;N = 19,不稳定组)和一个对照组(N = 18)。在这项单盲随机对照研究中,两个干预组接受了为期 12 周的训练计划,每周两次,每次 45 分钟,包括力量和平衡练习。稳定(ST)组在稳定的地面上进行训练,而不稳定(UNST)组则在不稳定的地面上进行训练。动态平衡是通过计算压力中心(CoP)轨迹来评估的,而驱动的可移动平台会对支撑基底造成意外扰动。具体来说,我们考虑了从扰动开始的 2.5 秒时间窗内的以下 CoP 相关参数:位移(Area95)、平均速度(单位路径)、前后第一峰值(FP)、扰动后变异性(PPV)和最大振荡(ΔCoPMax)。通过在带仪器的椅子上进行等长最大自主收缩来测量股四头肌的优势力量:结果:在五个与 CoP 相关的参数(即 Area95、Unit Path、ΔCoPMax 和 PPV)中,UNST 组有四个参数有明显改善,最小为 14.28%(d = 0.44),最大为 52.82%(d = 0.58)。ST 组仅在五个 CoP 相关参数中的两个(即 ΔCoPMax 和 PPV)有明显改善,分别提高了 12.48% (d = 0.68) 和 19.10% (d = 1.06)。两个干预组都增加了最大等长股四头肌力量(UNST:17.27%,d = 0.69;ST:22.29%,d = 0.98)。结论:结论:稳定表面促进了肌肉力量的快速增长。结论:稳定表面能更快地增强肌肉力量,而不稳定表面则能更有效地提高动态平衡效率。这些研究结果表明,在不稳定而非稳定的地面上进行多模式训练有可能降低老年人跌倒的发生率:NCT05769361,2023年3月13日回顾性注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05769361?lat=45.3661864&lng=11.8209139&locStr=Padova,%20Italy&distance=50&page=11&rank=107 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信