[How to Support People with Hearing Impairment beyond Hearing aid Provision - A Systematic Review on Self-Management Interventions].

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sophie Geßner, Michael Fuchs, Lennart Heinrich Pieper, Kathleen Tretbar
{"title":"[How to Support People with Hearing Impairment beyond Hearing aid Provision - A Systematic Review on Self-Management Interventions].","authors":"Sophie Geßner, Michael Fuchs, Lennart Heinrich Pieper, Kathleen Tretbar","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-7521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with hearing handicap have to use a whole range of strategies to cope with everyday challenges - they have to self-manage their hearing impairment. While the support of self-management is well established in foreign language audiological rehabilitation programs, there are no recommendations in Germany yet. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is first to give an overview of existing self-management interventions for people with hearing handicap and then to suggest possible applications in the German care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed. The articles dealt with self-management interventions for people with hearing impairment. This eligibility criterion was applied to titles, abstracts, and full texts. If eligible, information on the publication, intervention, and evaluation were extracted and qualitatively summarized. The methodological quality of studies was investigated using the NIH assessment tool for interventional studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 papers could be included and show a high heterogeneity regarding methodological quality, applied intervention, and design of evaluation. The interventions pursuing various goals include a wide range of content (e. g., communication improvement or psychosocial aspects) and have been implemented on a group-based, individual-based, or self-administered level. Despite a few studies that failed to demonstrate intervention effects, most evaluations found positive ef-fects of the intervention on hearing impairment, psychological well-being, and communication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The included studies present a high heterogeneity with regard to methodological quality, the intervention conducted, and the evaluation design. Therefore, a summary of the findings was only possible in a qualitative manner. Possibilities of adapting existing intervention programs as well as chances and limits of an implementation in the German health care system are to be discussed in the following.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, interventions including self-management support seem to be a profitable complement to sole technical device supply and should be further fostered in German-speaking countries as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-7521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: People with hearing handicap have to use a whole range of strategies to cope with everyday challenges - they have to self-manage their hearing impairment. While the support of self-management is well established in foreign language audiological rehabilitation programs, there are no recommendations in Germany yet. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is first to give an overview of existing self-management interventions for people with hearing handicap and then to suggest possible applications in the German care system.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed. The articles dealt with self-management interventions for people with hearing impairment. This eligibility criterion was applied to titles, abstracts, and full texts. If eligible, information on the publication, intervention, and evaluation were extracted and qualitatively summarized. The methodological quality of studies was investigated using the NIH assessment tool for interventional studies.

Results: 23 papers could be included and show a high heterogeneity regarding methodological quality, applied intervention, and design of evaluation. The interventions pursuing various goals include a wide range of content (e. g., communication improvement or psychosocial aspects) and have been implemented on a group-based, individual-based, or self-administered level. Despite a few studies that failed to demonstrate intervention effects, most evaluations found positive ef-fects of the intervention on hearing impairment, psychological well-being, and communication.

Discussion: The included studies present a high heterogeneity with regard to methodological quality, the intervention conducted, and the evaluation design. Therefore, a summary of the findings was only possible in a qualitative manner. Possibilities of adapting existing intervention programs as well as chances and limits of an implementation in the German health care system are to be discussed in the following.

Conclusion: Overall, interventions including self-management support seem to be a profitable complement to sole technical device supply and should be further fostered in German-speaking countries as well.

[如何在提供助听器之外为听障人士提供支持--关于自我管理干预措施的系统回顾]。
目的:有听力障碍的人必须使用各种策略来应对日常挑战--他们必须对听力障碍进行自我管理。虽然外语听力康复项目中对自我管理的支持已经非常成熟,但在德国还没有相关的建议。因此,本系统性综述的目的首先是概述现有的针对听力障碍者的自我管理干预措施,然后提出在德国医疗系统中可能的应用建议:方法:在 PubMed 上进行了系统的文献检索。方法:在 PubMed 上进行了系统的文献检索,文章涉及针对听力障碍者的自我管理干预措施。这一资格标准适用于标题、摘要和全文。如果符合条件,则提取并定性总结有关出版物、干预措施和评估的信息。使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的干预研究评估工具对研究的方法学质量进行了调查。结果:23 篇论文被纳入其中,并在方法学质量、应用干预和评估设计方面显示出高度的异质性。追求不同目标的干预措施包括广泛的内容(如改善沟通或社会心理方面),并在小组、个人或自我管理的层面上实施。尽管有少数研究未能证明干预效果,但大多数评估发现,干预对听力损伤、心理健康和沟通有积极影响:讨论:所收录的研究在方法质量、所采取的干预措施和评估设计方面存在很大的异质性。因此,只能对研究结果进行定性总结。下文将讨论调整现有干预计划的可能性,以及在德国医疗保健系统中实施的机会和局限性:总之,包括自我管理支持在内的干预措施似乎是对单一技术设备供应的有益补充,应在德语国家进一步推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信