Complications and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs: 79 cases (2002-2015)

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J. C. James, S. O'Neill, G. E. Moore, K. M. Scotti, K. L. Perry, A. A. Sterman
{"title":"Complications and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs: 79 cases (2002-2015)","authors":"J. C. James,&nbsp;S. O'Neill,&nbsp;G. E. Moore,&nbsp;K. M. Scotti,&nbsp;K. L. Perry,&nbsp;A. A. Sterman","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the complication rate, mortality rate and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-institutional retrospective study including dogs that had undergone surgery that involved the cecum or the colon. Medical records from three referral hospitals were reviewed for patient demographics and clinical data. The association between putative risk factors and survival to discharge or complications was assessed using univariable and multivariable analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-nine dogs met the criteria to be included in this study. Fifty-five dogs had full thickness incision surgeries, while 24 dogs had partial thickness surgeries. The complication and mortality rates for full thickness and partial thickness cecal/colonic surgeries were not statistically different. The dehiscence rate of colonic anastomosis in this study was four of 47 (8.5%). On univariate analysis, performing full thickness procedures out of hours had an association with increased complications and mortality. On multivariable analysis, no factors were associated with survival to discharge or complications. There was no association of board-certified surgeon presence in surgery with complications or mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The performance of full thickness cecal/colonic surgery is not associated with a statistically significant increased risk for complications or mortality compared to partial thickness procedures, with a possible increased risk of complications and mortality in full thickness procedures out of hours.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsap.13763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the complication rate, mortality rate and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs.

Materials and Methods

A multi-institutional retrospective study including dogs that had undergone surgery that involved the cecum or the colon. Medical records from three referral hospitals were reviewed for patient demographics and clinical data. The association between putative risk factors and survival to discharge or complications was assessed using univariable and multivariable analysis.

Results

Seventy-nine dogs met the criteria to be included in this study. Fifty-five dogs had full thickness incision surgeries, while 24 dogs had partial thickness surgeries. The complication and mortality rates for full thickness and partial thickness cecal/colonic surgeries were not statistically different. The dehiscence rate of colonic anastomosis in this study was four of 47 (8.5%). On univariate analysis, performing full thickness procedures out of hours had an association with increased complications and mortality. On multivariable analysis, no factors were associated with survival to discharge or complications. There was no association of board-certified surgeon presence in surgery with complications or mortality.

Clinical Significance

The performance of full thickness cecal/colonic surgery is not associated with a statistically significant increased risk for complications or mortality compared to partial thickness procedures, with a possible increased risk of complications and mortality in full thickness procedures out of hours.

犬盲肠或结肠手术的并发症和潜在风险因素:79 例病例(2002-2015 年)。
目的:评估犬盲肠或结肠手术的并发症发生率、死亡率和潜在风险因素:评估犬盲肠或结肠手术的并发症发生率、死亡率和潜在风险因素:多机构回顾性研究,包括接受过盲肠或结肠手术的狗。研究人员查阅了三家转诊医院的病历,以了解患者的人口统计学特征和临床数据。采用单变量和多变量分析评估了推测的风险因素与出院存活率或并发症之间的关系:结果:79 只犬符合纳入本研究的标准。55只狗接受了全厚度切口手术,24只狗接受了部分厚度切口手术。全厚和部分厚盲肠/结肠手术的并发症发生率和死亡率没有统计学差异。在这项研究中,结肠吻合术的开裂率为 47 例中的 4 例(8.5%)。经单变量分析,在非工作时间进行全厚手术与并发症和死亡率增加有关。在多变量分析中,没有任何因素与出院存活率或并发症有关。有执照的外科医生参与手术与并发症和死亡率没有关系:临床意义:与部分厚度手术相比,全厚度盲肠/结肠手术的并发症或死亡率风险并没有统计学意义上的显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信