The value of deep learning-based X-ray techniques in detecting and classifying K-L grades of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10928-9
Haoming Zhao, Liang Ou, Ziming Zhang, Le Zhang, Ke Liu, Jianjun Kuang
{"title":"The value of deep learning-based X-ray techniques in detecting and classifying K-L grades of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haoming Zhao, Liang Ou, Ziming Zhang, Le Zhang, Ke Liu, Jianjun Kuang","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10928-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a prevalent degenerative joint disease, is primarily diagnosed through X-ray imaging. The Kellgren-Lawrence grading system (K-L) is the gold standard for evaluating KOA severity through X-ray analysis. However, this method is highly subjective and non-quantifiable, limiting its effectiveness in detecting subtle joint changes on X-rays. Recent researchers have been directed towards developing deep-learning (DL) techniques for a more accurate diagnosis of KOA using X-ray images. Despite advancements in these intelligent methods, the debate over their diagnostic sensitivity continues. Hence, we conducted the current meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE up to July 11, 2023. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Given the multi-classification nature of DL tasks, the sensitivity of DL across different K-L grades was meta-analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies were included, encompassing 62,158 images. These images consisted of 22,388 for K-L<sub>0</sub>, 13,415 for K-L<sub>1</sub>, 15,597 for K-L<sub>2</sub>, 7768 for K-L<sub>3</sub>, and 2990 for K-L<sub>4</sub>. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of DL was 86.74% for K-L<sub>0</sub> (95% CI: 80.01%-92.28%), 64.00% for K-L<sub>1</sub> (95% CI: 51.81%-75.35%), 75.03% for K-L<sub>2</sub> (95% CI: 66.00%-83.09%), 84.76% for K-L<sub>3</sub> (95% CI: 78.34%-90.25%), and 90.32% for K-L<sub>4</sub> (95% CI: 85.39%-94.40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL multi-classification methods based on X-ray imaging generally demonstrate a favorable sensitivity rate (over 50%) in distinguishing between K-L<sub>0</sub>-K-L<sub>4</sub>. Specifically, for K-L<sub>4</sub>, the sensitivity is highly satisfactory at 90.32%. In contrast, the sensitivity rates for K-L<sub>1-2</sub> still need improvement.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Deep-learning methods have been useful to some extent in assessing the effectiveness of X-rays for osteoarthritis of the knee. However, this requires further research and reliable data to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>X-ray deep-learning (DL) methods are debatable for evaluating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) under The Kellgren-Lawrence system (K-L). Multi-classification deep-learning methods are more clinically relevant for assessing K-L grading than dichotomous results. For K-L3 and K-L4, X-ray-based DL has high diagnostic performance; early KOA needs to be further improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"327-340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10928-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a prevalent degenerative joint disease, is primarily diagnosed through X-ray imaging. The Kellgren-Lawrence grading system (K-L) is the gold standard for evaluating KOA severity through X-ray analysis. However, this method is highly subjective and non-quantifiable, limiting its effectiveness in detecting subtle joint changes on X-rays. Recent researchers have been directed towards developing deep-learning (DL) techniques for a more accurate diagnosis of KOA using X-ray images. Despite advancements in these intelligent methods, the debate over their diagnostic sensitivity continues. Hence, we conducted the current meta-analysis.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE up to July 11, 2023. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Given the multi-classification nature of DL tasks, the sensitivity of DL across different K-L grades was meta-analyzed.

Results: A total of 19 studies were included, encompassing 62,158 images. These images consisted of 22,388 for K-L0, 13,415 for K-L1, 15,597 for K-L2, 7768 for K-L3, and 2990 for K-L4. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of DL was 86.74% for K-L0 (95% CI: 80.01%-92.28%), 64.00% for K-L1 (95% CI: 51.81%-75.35%), 75.03% for K-L2 (95% CI: 66.00%-83.09%), 84.76% for K-L3 (95% CI: 78.34%-90.25%), and 90.32% for K-L4 (95% CI: 85.39%-94.40%).

Conclusions: The DL multi-classification methods based on X-ray imaging generally demonstrate a favorable sensitivity rate (over 50%) in distinguishing between K-L0-K-L4. Specifically, for K-L4, the sensitivity is highly satisfactory at 90.32%. In contrast, the sensitivity rates for K-L1-2 still need improvement.

Clinical relevance statement: Deep-learning methods have been useful to some extent in assessing the effectiveness of X-rays for osteoarthritis of the knee. However, this requires further research and reliable data to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice.

Key points: X-ray deep-learning (DL) methods are debatable for evaluating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) under The Kellgren-Lawrence system (K-L). Multi-classification deep-learning methods are more clinically relevant for assessing K-L grading than dichotomous results. For K-L3 and K-L4, X-ray-based DL has high diagnostic performance; early KOA needs to be further improved.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的 X 射线技术在膝关节骨关节炎 K-L 级检测和分类中的价值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是一种常见的退行性关节疾病,主要通过 X 光成像进行诊断。凯尔格伦-劳伦斯分级系统(K-L)是通过 X 射线分析评估 KOA 严重程度的黄金标准。然而,这种方法主观性强且不可量化,限制了其检测 X 光片上细微关节变化的有效性。最近,研究人员致力于开发深度学习(DL)技术,以便利用 X 光图像更准确地诊断 KOA。尽管这些智能方法取得了进步,但关于其诊断灵敏度的争论仍在继续。因此,我们进行了本次荟萃分析:截至 2023 年 7 月 11 日,我们在 PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science 和 IEEE 中进行了全面检索。采用 QUADAS-2 工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。考虑到 DL 任务的多重分类性质,对不同 K-L 等级的 DL 敏感性进行了元分析:共纳入了 19 项研究,涉及 62,158 张图像。这些图像包括 22388 张 K-L0、13415 张 K-L1、15597 张 K-L2、7768 张 K-L3 和 2990 张 K-L4。荟萃分析表明,DL 对 K-L0 的灵敏度为 86.74%(95% CI:80.01%-92.28%),对 K-L1 的灵敏度为 64.00%(95% CI:51.81%-75.35%),对 K-L2 的灵敏度为 75.03%(95% CI:66.00%-83.09%),对 K-L3 的灵敏度为 84.76%(95% CI:78.34%-90.25%),对 K-L4 的灵敏度为 90.32%(95% CI:85.39%-94.40%):结论:基于 X 射线成像的 DL 多重分类方法在区分 K-L0-K-L4 方面显示出良好的灵敏度(超过 50%)。具体而言,K-L4 的灵敏度非常令人满意,达到 90.32%。相比之下,K-L1-2 的灵敏度仍有待提高:深度学习方法在一定程度上有助于评估 X 射线治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的效果。然而,这需要进一步的研究和可靠的数据,才能为临床实践提供具体建议:X射线深度学习(DL)方法在根据凯尔格伦-劳伦斯系统(K-L)评估膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)方面存在争议。与二分法结果相比,多分类深度学习方法在评估K-L分级时更具临床相关性。对于 K-L3 和 K-L4,基于 X 射线的 DL 具有很高的诊断性能;早期 KOA 需要进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信