Restoration of degraded alpine meadows from the perspective of plant–soil feedbacks

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Chengyang Li, Chimin Lai, Fei Peng, Jun Zhou, Wu Zhang, Xiuli Song, Songying Luo, Jianbo Sun, Xiaojie Chen, Ben Chen, Ji Chen, Xian Xue
{"title":"Restoration of degraded alpine meadows from the perspective of plant–soil feedbacks","authors":"Chengyang Li, Chimin Lai, Fei Peng, Jun Zhou, Wu Zhang, Xiuli Song, Songying Luo, Jianbo Sun, Xiaojie Chen, Ben Chen, Ji Chen, Xian Xue","doi":"10.1007/s00374-024-01847-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the plant–soil feedbacks (PSFs) of dominant species of alpine meadow under different degradation status could provide insights into sustainable restoration. The direction, strength, and influencing factors of dominant species’ PSFs in nondegraded (Intact), moderately degraded (MD), and severely degraded (SD) alpine meadows were examined in a two-phase PSFs experiment. Species of Intact exhibited neutral conspecific PSFs, whereas those of MD and SD exhibited negative conspecific PSFs. The species of MD demonstrated neutral heterospecific PSFs to those of Intact, whereas that of SD negatively feedbacked to those of Intact and MD. The NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N of soil conditioned by the species of Intact were 66% and 58% higher than the control (mixture soil conditioned by all species); but they were 37% and 32% lower in soil conditioned by the dominant species of SD. The relative abundance of soil fungal pathotrophs was 57% and 74% higher in soil conditioned by the dominant species of MD and SD than in Intact soil. The conspecific and heterospecific PSFs of all species positively correlated with the plant conditioning and degradation induced changes of difference in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N and negatively correlated with the difference in relative abundance of pathotrophs. Soil microorganisms and nutrients explained most of the variation in conspecific (43%) and heterospecific PSFs (60%). Our results indicated that the N addition would facilitate the sustainable restoration of degraded alpine meadows because the addition of available N could drive the heterospecific PSFs toward more positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":9210,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01847-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the plant–soil feedbacks (PSFs) of dominant species of alpine meadow under different degradation status could provide insights into sustainable restoration. The direction, strength, and influencing factors of dominant species’ PSFs in nondegraded (Intact), moderately degraded (MD), and severely degraded (SD) alpine meadows were examined in a two-phase PSFs experiment. Species of Intact exhibited neutral conspecific PSFs, whereas those of MD and SD exhibited negative conspecific PSFs. The species of MD demonstrated neutral heterospecific PSFs to those of Intact, whereas that of SD negatively feedbacked to those of Intact and MD. The NO3-N and NH4+-N of soil conditioned by the species of Intact were 66% and 58% higher than the control (mixture soil conditioned by all species); but they were 37% and 32% lower in soil conditioned by the dominant species of SD. The relative abundance of soil fungal pathotrophs was 57% and 74% higher in soil conditioned by the dominant species of MD and SD than in Intact soil. The conspecific and heterospecific PSFs of all species positively correlated with the plant conditioning and degradation induced changes of difference in NO3-N and NH4+-N and negatively correlated with the difference in relative abundance of pathotrophs. Soil microorganisms and nutrients explained most of the variation in conspecific (43%) and heterospecific PSFs (60%). Our results indicated that the N addition would facilitate the sustainable restoration of degraded alpine meadows because the addition of available N could drive the heterospecific PSFs toward more positive.

Abstract Image

从植物-土壤反馈的角度恢复退化的高山草甸
了解不同退化状态下高山草甸优势物种的植物-土壤反馈(PSFs)可为可持续恢复提供启示。通过两阶段 PSFs 实验,研究了未退化草甸(Intact)、中度退化草甸(MD)和严重退化草甸(SD)中优势物种 PSFs 的方向、强度和影响因素。无退化草甸的物种表现出中性的同种异体PSF,而中度退化草甸和严重退化草甸的物种则表现出负性的同种异体PSF。MD的物种对Intact的物种表现出中性的异种PSF,而SD的物种对Intact和MD的物种表现出负反馈。与对照组(由所有物种调节的混合土壤)相比,由完整物种调节的土壤中的NO3--N和NH4+-N分别高出66%和58%;但在由优势物种SD调节的土壤中,NO3--N和NH4+-N分别低37%和32%。由 MD 和 SD 优势菌种调节的土壤中,土壤真菌病原菌的相对丰度分别比未改变土壤中高 57% 和 74%。所有物种的同种和异种PSF与植物调理和降解引起的NO3--N和NH4+-N的差异变化呈正相关,而与病原菌相对丰度的差异呈负相关。土壤微生物和养分解释了同种(43%)和异种(60%)PSFs 的大部分变化。我们的研究结果表明,氮的添加将促进退化的高山草甸的可持续恢复,因为可用氮的添加会使异种PSFs趋于正值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Biology and Fertility of Soils 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Biology and Fertility of Soils publishes in English original papers, reviews and short communications on all fundamental and applied aspects of biology – microflora and microfauna - and fertility of soils. It offers a forum for research aimed at broadening the understanding of biological functions, processes and interactions in soils, particularly concerning the increasing demands of agriculture, deforestation and industrialization. The journal includes articles on techniques and methods that evaluate processes, biogeochemical interactions and ecological stresses, and sometimes presents special issues on relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信