JohnMichael Jurgensen , Nora Nickels McLean , Javier I. Borráz-León , Valentina D'Anna , Luigi Guiso , Aldo Rustichini , Dario Maestripieri
{"title":"Psychosocial stress, hormones, and impulsivity/risk-taking in economic decision-making","authors":"JohnMichael Jurgensen , Nora Nickels McLean , Javier I. Borráz-León , Valentina D'Anna , Luigi Guiso , Aldo Rustichini , Dario Maestripieri","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explored the relationships between acute psychosocial stress, hormones, probability and delay discounting, and time perspective in men and women. Study participants were 120 (60 male, 60 female) young adults. Half of them underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and half served as controls. Saliva samples were collected from all participants and concentrations of testosterone and cortisol were measured. Risk taking and impulsivity were assessed with a probability discounting and a delay discounting task, respectively. Participants filled out several questionnaires, including the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). The TSST was associated with an increase in salivary cortisol concentrations in males and females, and with an increase in testosterone in males, but not in females. Variation in probability discounting was predicted by changes in testosterone (the higher the testosterone the greater the risk-taking) and by the ZTPI, whereas variation in delay discounting scores was not predicted by hormones, the ZTPI, or other variables. Our study contributes to research on psychosocial stress, hormones, and decision-making by reporting, for the first time, an association between stress-induced changes in testosterone and economic risk-taking. Our study also suggests that risk-taking and impulsivity are different processes associated with different psychological and physiological mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored the relationships between acute psychosocial stress, hormones, probability and delay discounting, and time perspective in men and women. Study participants were 120 (60 male, 60 female) young adults. Half of them underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and half served as controls. Saliva samples were collected from all participants and concentrations of testosterone and cortisol were measured. Risk taking and impulsivity were assessed with a probability discounting and a delay discounting task, respectively. Participants filled out several questionnaires, including the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). The TSST was associated with an increase in salivary cortisol concentrations in males and females, and with an increase in testosterone in males, but not in females. Variation in probability discounting was predicted by changes in testosterone (the higher the testosterone the greater the risk-taking) and by the ZTPI, whereas variation in delay discounting scores was not predicted by hormones, the ZTPI, or other variables. Our study contributes to research on psychosocial stress, hormones, and decision-making by reporting, for the first time, an association between stress-induced changes in testosterone and economic risk-taking. Our study also suggests that risk-taking and impulsivity are different processes associated with different psychological and physiological mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.