R. Muñoz , S. Ashraf Vaghefi , A. Sharma , V. Muccione
{"title":"A framework for policy assessment using exploratory modeling and analysis: An application in flood control","authors":"R. Muñoz , S. Ashraf Vaghefi , A. Sharma , V. Muccione","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uncertainties about future climate and socioeconomic conditions challenge the design and implementation of adaptation measures. Deterministic methods, although helpful in reducing uncertainty and identifying optimal solutions, may fall short to identify flexible and robust strategies under rapidly and uncertain evolving circumstances. This is where robust decision-making approaches, such as Exploratory Modeling and Analysis (EMA), can contribute. Despite its wide use in other fields, the application of EMA in climate change adaptation has been limited by the complexity of its concepts and methodologies. To address this gap, this study introduces a framework that leverages EMA to conduct a case study on flood reduction in Australia. Through EMA, the study systematically evaluates several climate scenarios and policy options across thousands of simulations to identify a set of robust strategies rather than a few optimal solutions. The results demonstrate that a multifaceted approach, which integrates infrastructure with nature-based solutions, not only reduces flood events but also contributes to sustainability. Moreover, EMA elucidates the advantages and limitations of each policy option, enhancing the decision-making process by identifying policies that are best suited to the specific context. While this study is centered on flood risk management, the principles and methodologies are broadly applicable, offering valuable insights for managing a variety of climate-related risks and informing global climate adaptation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100635"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000524/pdfft?md5=75b2c57d275a0ab04629e6b08401b508&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096324000524-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uncertainties about future climate and socioeconomic conditions challenge the design and implementation of adaptation measures. Deterministic methods, although helpful in reducing uncertainty and identifying optimal solutions, may fall short to identify flexible and robust strategies under rapidly and uncertain evolving circumstances. This is where robust decision-making approaches, such as Exploratory Modeling and Analysis (EMA), can contribute. Despite its wide use in other fields, the application of EMA in climate change adaptation has been limited by the complexity of its concepts and methodologies. To address this gap, this study introduces a framework that leverages EMA to conduct a case study on flood reduction in Australia. Through EMA, the study systematically evaluates several climate scenarios and policy options across thousands of simulations to identify a set of robust strategies rather than a few optimal solutions. The results demonstrate that a multifaceted approach, which integrates infrastructure with nature-based solutions, not only reduces flood events but also contributes to sustainability. Moreover, EMA elucidates the advantages and limitations of each policy option, enhancing the decision-making process by identifying policies that are best suited to the specific context. While this study is centered on flood risk management, the principles and methodologies are broadly applicable, offering valuable insights for managing a variety of climate-related risks and informing global climate adaptation strategies.
未来气候和社会经济条件的不确定性给适应措施的设计和实施带来了挑战。确定性方法虽然有助于减少不确定性和确定最佳解决方案,但可能无法在快速、不确定的演变环境下确定灵活、稳健的战略。这正是探索性建模与分析(EMA)等稳健决策方法可以发挥作用的地方。尽管 EMA 在其他领域得到广泛应用,但由于其概念和方法的复杂性,其在气候变化适应中的应用一直受到限制。为了弥补这一不足,本研究引入了一个框架,利用 EMA 对澳大利亚的洪水减少情况进行案例研究。通过 EMA,该研究在数千次模拟中系统地评估了几种气候情景和政策选项,以确定一系列稳健的战略,而不是少数几个最佳解决方案。研究结果表明,将基础设施与基于自然的解决方案相结合的多层面方法不仅能减少洪水事件,还能促进可持续发展。此外,EMA 还阐明了每种政策选择的优势和局限性,通过确定最适合具体情况的政策来加强决策过程。虽然本研究以洪水风险管理为中心,但其原则和方法具有广泛的适用性,可为管理各种气候相关风险提供有价值的见解,并为全球气候适应战略提供信息。
期刊介绍:
Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term.
The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.