{"title":"Efecto de la cirugía bariátrica en el riesgo de cáncer de mama. Evaluación de la calidad de los metaanálisis","authors":"Mario Arturo González Mariño","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2024.100609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Obesity is considered a risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Some meta-analyses report the reversal of this risk with bariatric surgery. However, the methodological quality of these studies is unknown. To evaluate systematic reviews that include non-randomized studies, the AMSTAR 2 tool is used.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of meta-analyses examining the effects of bariatric surgery on breast cancer risk.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was performed using the search terms “Obesity surgical procedures and Breast Neoplasms” in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. The finally selected meta-analyses were scored with the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The database searches found 87 articles, of which, after selection and complete reading of the articles, six were finally extracted for qualitative analysis. Meta-analyses reviewed using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool found that overall confidence in the results was critically low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Meta-analyses showed an association between bariatric surgery and a lower risk of developing breast cancer. However, all of them have important limitations. Evaluation using the AMSTAR-2 assessment tool showed that overall confidence in the results of the studies evaluated was critically low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"37 4","pages":"Article 100609"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158224000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Obesity is considered a risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Some meta-analyses report the reversal of this risk with bariatric surgery. However, the methodological quality of these studies is unknown. To evaluate systematic reviews that include non-randomized studies, the AMSTAR 2 tool is used.
Objective
To evaluate the quality of meta-analyses examining the effects of bariatric surgery on breast cancer risk.
Materials and methods
A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was performed using the search terms “Obesity surgical procedures and Breast Neoplasms” in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. The finally selected meta-analyses were scored with the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool.
Results
The database searches found 87 articles, of which, after selection and complete reading of the articles, six were finally extracted for qualitative analysis. Meta-analyses reviewed using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool found that overall confidence in the results was critically low.
Conclusions
Meta-analyses showed an association between bariatric surgery and a lower risk of developing breast cancer. However, all of them have important limitations. Evaluation using the AMSTAR-2 assessment tool showed that overall confidence in the results of the studies evaluated was critically low.