Responding to climate services in the context of drought: A systematic review

IF 4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lotte C.F.E. Muller , Marije Schaafsma , Maurizio Mazzoleni , Anne F. Van Loon
{"title":"Responding to climate services in the context of drought: A systematic review","authors":"Lotte C.F.E. Muller ,&nbsp;Marije Schaafsma ,&nbsp;Maurizio Mazzoleni ,&nbsp;Anne F. Van Loon","doi":"10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate Services (CS) are increasingly being employed to address challenges resulting from climatic hazards. Research has focused on identifying and categorising CS, CS uptake, barriers to use, and CS user needs. Findings on empirical responses to CS are scattered. The aim of this paper is to systematically review existing literature on behavioural, perception, and attitude responses to CS, in the context of drought. Our review considers CS responses explicitly and is not limited to specific user groups or regions. Using the Web of Science database, we identified 88 journal articles containing terms related to CS, behaviour and droughts, published between 1999 and 2022. We identified and classified the characteristics of the CS, responses to CS, and the impacts that these responses had. We find that behavioural responses are reported more frequently than attitude and perception responses to CS. Half of the CS users consisted of farmers, mostly provided with seasonal forecasts, who respond to the CS information predominantly by changing crops or crop planting/harvesting dates. Non-farmers responded to CS behaviourally by enacting or developing plans, policies, or programs. This overview provides an evidence base towards the assessment of impacts of CS, and suggests that further developing CS could require a shift from providing precise climate or weather data, towards providing how climate or weather information relates to the decision-spaces of users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51332,"journal":{"name":"Climate Services","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880724000487/pdfft?md5=0e8522b44cf6a40f81bcf2cd9188e911&pid=1-s2.0-S2405880724000487-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880724000487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate Services (CS) are increasingly being employed to address challenges resulting from climatic hazards. Research has focused on identifying and categorising CS, CS uptake, barriers to use, and CS user needs. Findings on empirical responses to CS are scattered. The aim of this paper is to systematically review existing literature on behavioural, perception, and attitude responses to CS, in the context of drought. Our review considers CS responses explicitly and is not limited to specific user groups or regions. Using the Web of Science database, we identified 88 journal articles containing terms related to CS, behaviour and droughts, published between 1999 and 2022. We identified and classified the characteristics of the CS, responses to CS, and the impacts that these responses had. We find that behavioural responses are reported more frequently than attitude and perception responses to CS. Half of the CS users consisted of farmers, mostly provided with seasonal forecasts, who respond to the CS information predominantly by changing crops or crop planting/harvesting dates. Non-farmers responded to CS behaviourally by enacting or developing plans, policies, or programs. This overview provides an evidence base towards the assessment of impacts of CS, and suggests that further developing CS could require a shift from providing precise climate or weather data, towards providing how climate or weather information relates to the decision-spaces of users.

在干旱背景下应对气候服务:系统审查
人们越来越多地利用气候服务(CS)来应对气候灾害带来的挑战。研究主要集中在识别和分类气候服务、气候服务的吸收、使用的障碍以及气候服务用户的需求。有关 CS 经验性反应的研究结果比较零散。本文旨在以干旱为背景,系统回顾现有文献中有关对 CS 的行为、认知和态度反应的内容。我们的综述明确考虑了对 CS 的反应,并不局限于特定的用户群体或地区。我们使用 Web of Science 数据库,确定了 1999 年至 2022 年间发表的 88 篇包含与 CS、行为和干旱相关术语的期刊文章。我们确定了气候变化的特征、对气候变化的反应以及这些反应所产生的影响,并对其进行了分类。我们发现,行为反应比对 CS 的态度和认知反应更常被报道。半数的 "可持续农业研究 "用户由农民组成,他们大多获得了季节性预报,对 "可持续农业研究 "信息的反应主要是改变作物或作物种植/收获日期。非农业人口则通过颁布或制定计划、政策或方案对 CS 做出行为反应。这一概述为评估 "可持续发展研究 "的影响提供了证据基础,并表明进一步发展 "可持续发展研究 "可能需要从提供精确的气候或天气数据转向提供气候或天气信息如何与用户的决策空间相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climate Services
Climate Services Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The journal Climate Services publishes research with a focus on science-based and user-specific climate information underpinning climate services, ultimately to assist society to adapt to climate change. Climate Services brings science and practice closer together. The journal addresses both researchers in the field of climate service research, and stakeholders and practitioners interested in or already applying climate services. It serves as a means of communication, dialogue and exchange between researchers and stakeholders. Climate services pioneers novel research areas that directly refer to how climate information can be applied in methodologies and tools for adaptation to climate change. It publishes best practice examples, case studies as well as theories, methods and data analysis with a clear connection to climate services. The focus of the published work is often multi-disciplinary, case-specific, tailored to specific sectors and strongly application-oriented. To offer a suitable outlet for such studies, Climate Services journal introduced a new section in the research article type. The research article contains a classical scientific part as well as a section with easily understandable practical implications for policy makers and practitioners. The journal''s focus is on the use and usability of climate information for adaptation purposes underpinning climate services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信