Driving towards a just transition? The case of the European car industry

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
John Szabó , Peter Newell
{"title":"Driving towards a just transition? The case of the European car industry","authors":"John Szabó ,&nbsp;Peter Newell","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Actors within the European Union are seeking to pursue a just transition in their shift to a low carbon energy system, but their ability to do this often conflicts with relations of power embedded in the geographical distribution of global capitalist production. This paper explores the shift from manufacturing internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles in Europe and highlights how, despite attempts to address justice issues in this transition, it reproduces regional and social inequalities. We seek to explain this by drawing on literature on global production networks and world-systems theory to show how pre-existing inequalities between key actors are often deepened, as high value added processes are retained in the so-called ‘core’ countries while the ‘semi-periphery’ states of Europe are forced to compete against one-another to maintain the economic growth and employment that underpins their legitimacy. Although a just transition implies attention to procedural, distributive, and restorative aspects of justice, this paper shows how difficult it is to address each of these dimensions in practice through the case of the European automotive sector and relations between manufacturers in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in particular.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002408/pdfft?md5=ac46602148d045139d545076fef2f2c8&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002408-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actors within the European Union are seeking to pursue a just transition in their shift to a low carbon energy system, but their ability to do this often conflicts with relations of power embedded in the geographical distribution of global capitalist production. This paper explores the shift from manufacturing internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles in Europe and highlights how, despite attempts to address justice issues in this transition, it reproduces regional and social inequalities. We seek to explain this by drawing on literature on global production networks and world-systems theory to show how pre-existing inequalities between key actors are often deepened, as high value added processes are retained in the so-called ‘core’ countries while the ‘semi-periphery’ states of Europe are forced to compete against one-another to maintain the economic growth and employment that underpins their legitimacy. Although a just transition implies attention to procedural, distributive, and restorative aspects of justice, this paper shows how difficult it is to address each of these dimensions in practice through the case of the European automotive sector and relations between manufacturers in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in particular.

实现公正过渡?欧洲汽车业的案例
欧盟内部的行为者在向低碳能源系统转变的过程中,正在寻求实现公正的过渡,但他们实现这一目标的能力往往与全球资本主义生产的地理分布所蕴含的权力关系相冲突。本文探讨了欧洲从制造内燃机汽车向电动汽车的转变,并强调了尽管在这一转变中试图解决公正问题,但它如何再现了地区和社会不平等。我们试图通过借鉴全球生产网络和世界系统理论的文献来解释这一点,以说明主要参与者之间原有的不平等是如何加深的,因为高附加值流程被保留在所谓的 "核心 "国家,而欧洲的 "半外围 "国家则被迫相互竞争,以维持经济增长和就业,这正是其合法性的基础。尽管公正的转型意味着对程序性、分配性和恢复性正义的关注,但本文通过欧洲汽车行业的案例以及德国与中欧和东欧制造商之间的关系,展示了在实践中解决上述各方面问题的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信