Evaluating accessibility benefits and ridership of bike-transit integration through a social equity lens

IF 7.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Luyu Liu , Jinhyung Lee , Harvey J. Miller
{"title":"Evaluating accessibility benefits and ridership of bike-transit integration through a social equity lens","authors":"Luyu Liu ,&nbsp;Jinhyung Lee ,&nbsp;Harvey J. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integration of bike usage and transit services is an effective way to enhance accessibility for both transportation modes. Using high-resolution transit data, the study analyzes bike-transit multimodal accessibility and usage patterns through a social equity lens. Two types of accessibility increment are studied: <em>bicycle increment to public transit</em> – the benefits of using bicycle for transit riders, and <em>transit increment to cycling</em> – the merits of using transit for cyclists. Results show that bike-transit integration benefits both public transit riders and cyclists, expanding their accessible opportunities by up to 70% and enabling longer trips for cyclists while providing continuous benefits for public transit users. Meanwhile, better infrastructure significantly improves multimodal accessibility, resulting in more increment for public transit riders but less increment for cyclists. The paper also shows the spatiotemporal patterns of multimodal ridership. The research highlights disparities in bike-transit activities for Black communities due to inadequate local biking infrastructure. Black people majority neighborhoods enjoy less increment compared to other neighborhoods for shorter and very long trips; they also have disproportionately lower multimodal ridership despite much higher transit ridership and better transit access. Enhancing biking infrastructure in these areas can improve physical accessibility increment and promote social equity. The paper provides practical insights for transit planning, emphasizing the importance of connecting bike lanes and creating safer streets for cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48241,"journal":{"name":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102150"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524000796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration of bike usage and transit services is an effective way to enhance accessibility for both transportation modes. Using high-resolution transit data, the study analyzes bike-transit multimodal accessibility and usage patterns through a social equity lens. Two types of accessibility increment are studied: bicycle increment to public transit – the benefits of using bicycle for transit riders, and transit increment to cycling – the merits of using transit for cyclists. Results show that bike-transit integration benefits both public transit riders and cyclists, expanding their accessible opportunities by up to 70% and enabling longer trips for cyclists while providing continuous benefits for public transit users. Meanwhile, better infrastructure significantly improves multimodal accessibility, resulting in more increment for public transit riders but less increment for cyclists. The paper also shows the spatiotemporal patterns of multimodal ridership. The research highlights disparities in bike-transit activities for Black communities due to inadequate local biking infrastructure. Black people majority neighborhoods enjoy less increment compared to other neighborhoods for shorter and very long trips; they also have disproportionately lower multimodal ridership despite much higher transit ridership and better transit access. Enhancing biking infrastructure in these areas can improve physical accessibility increment and promote social equity. The paper provides practical insights for transit planning, emphasizing the importance of connecting bike lanes and creating safer streets for cycling.

从社会公平的角度评估自行车与公交一体化的无障碍优势和乘客数量
整合自行车使用和公交服务是提高两种交通方式可达性的有效途径。这项研究利用高分辨率的公交数据,从社会公平的角度分析了自行车-公交多式联运的可达性和使用模式。研究了两类可达性增量:自行车对公共交通的增量--公共交通乘客使用自行车的好处,以及公共交通对自行车的增量--自行车使用者使用公共交通的好处。研究结果表明,自行车与公共交通的结合既有利于公共交通乘客,也有利于骑自行车的人,可将他们的无障碍出行机会扩大多达 70%,并使骑自行车的人能够进行更长时间的出行,同时为公共交通用户带来持续的益处。同时,更好的基础设施能显著改善多式联运的可达性,从而为公共交通乘客带来更多增量,但为骑自行车者带来的增量较少。论文还展示了多式联运乘客的时空模式。研究强调,由于当地自行车基础设施不足,黑人社区的自行车交通活动存在差异。与其他社区相比,黑人占多数的社区在短途和长途旅行中享受的增量较少;尽管他们的公交乘坐率要高得多,而且交通便利,但他们的多式联运乘坐率也低得不成比例。加强这些地区的自行车基础设施建设,可以提高实际可达性增量,促进社会公平。本文为公交规划提供了实用的见解,强调了连接自行车道和为骑行创造更安全街道的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Computers, Environment and Urban Systemsis an interdisciplinary journal publishing cutting-edge and innovative computer-based research on environmental and urban systems, that privileges the geospatial perspective. The journal welcomes original high quality scholarship of a theoretical, applied or technological nature, and provides a stimulating presentation of perspectives, research developments, overviews of important new technologies and uses of major computational, information-based, and visualization innovations. Applied and theoretical contributions demonstrate the scope of computer-based analysis fostering a better understanding of environmental and urban systems, their spatial scope and their dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信