Analysis of risk priority number of FMEA and surprise index for components of 7 kW electric vehicle charger

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Suk Keun Hwang, Doo-Hyun Kim, Sung-Chul Kim
{"title":"Analysis of risk priority number of FMEA and surprise index for components of 7 kW electric vehicle charger","authors":"Suk Keun Hwang,&nbsp;Doo-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Chul Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to suggest systematic management measures by analyzing the risk of related part through FMEA of RPN index based on severity, occurrence, detection of 543,900 7 kW EV chargers installed until 2023 in South Korea and SI based on severity, detection and information score scale. To achieve this goal, this research investigated the current status of 7 kW EV chargers, and categorized the parts and assemblies of the investigated chargers. The failure mode of classified components was explored based on the 2016 edition of FMD, and the failure mode rate and information score of SI were referred to data contained in Nprd 2016, Eprd 2014; Fmd 2016. The identified failure mode, failure causes, and failure effects were described by domestic experts in EV charger-related sectors.</p><p>There were 4 risk factors (10%) felt under “Group A″, the upper 10% of RPN. Of these, inverter overheating ranked in the highest. Moreover, the analysis revealed one case of corrosion of the enclosure and overheating in the main board and communication board each. The effect of overheating was confirmed in these components excluding the enclosure. From the SI perspective, high values were obtained in 4 parts of AC/DC breaker, one of connector, and one of cable. Based on the extracted data, management strategies were suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest systematic management measures by analyzing the risk of related part through FMEA of RPN index based on severity, occurrence, detection of 543,900 7 kW EV chargers installed until 2023 in South Korea and SI based on severity, detection and information score scale. To achieve this goal, this research investigated the current status of 7 kW EV chargers, and categorized the parts and assemblies of the investigated chargers. The failure mode of classified components was explored based on the 2016 edition of FMD, and the failure mode rate and information score of SI were referred to data contained in Nprd 2016, Eprd 2014; Fmd 2016. The identified failure mode, failure causes, and failure effects were described by domestic experts in EV charger-related sectors.

There were 4 risk factors (10%) felt under “Group A″, the upper 10% of RPN. Of these, inverter overheating ranked in the highest. Moreover, the analysis revealed one case of corrosion of the enclosure and overheating in the main board and communication board each. The effect of overheating was confirmed in these components excluding the enclosure. From the SI perspective, high values were obtained in 4 parts of AC/DC breaker, one of connector, and one of cable. Based on the extracted data, management strategies were suggested.

7 kW 电动汽车充电器部件的 FMEA 风险优先级数和意外指数分析
本研究的目的是通过基于严重性、发生率、检测的 RPN 指数的 FMEA 分析相关部件的风险,以及基于严重性、检测和信息评分标准的 SI,对韩国截至 2023 年安装的 543900 个 7 kW 电动汽车充电器进行系统管理措施建议。为实现这一目标,本研究调查了 7 kW 电动汽车充电器的现状,并对所调查充电器的部件和组件进行了分类。分类部件的失效模式以 2016 版 FMD 为基础进行探讨,而 SI 的失效模式率和信息分值则参考了 Nprd 2016、Eprd 2014 和 Fmd 2016 中的数据。国内电动汽车充电器相关领域专家对已识别的失效模式、失效原因和失效影响进行了描述。"A组",即RPN的上10%,有4个风险因素(10%)。其中,逆变器过热排在首位。此外,分析还发现外壳腐蚀和主板及通信板过热各一例。除外壳外,过热对这些部件的影响已得到确认。从 SI 角度看,有 4 个 AC/DC 断路器部件、1 个连接器和 1 条电缆的 SI 值较高。根据提取的数据,提出了管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信