Advances in the diagnosis and follow-up of pleural lesions: a scoping review.

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2024.2375421
Vasiliki Panou, Rahul Bhatnagar, Najib Rahman, Thomas Decker Christensen, Pia Iben Pietersen, Arman Arshad, Christian B Laursen
{"title":"Advances in the diagnosis and follow-up of pleural lesions: a scoping review.","authors":"Vasiliki Panou, Rahul Bhatnagar, Najib Rahman, Thomas Decker Christensen, Pia Iben Pietersen, Arman Arshad, Christian B Laursen","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2375421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pleural lesions may have heterogeneous presentation and causes. In recent years, there have been significant advances in pleural lesions diagnostics. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art, and recent updates for diagnostic modalities and monitoring regimes for pleural lesions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A literature search was conducted through PubMed and Web of Science for relevant articles published from 1 January 2000- 1 March 2023. This article critically appraises the radiological modalities and biopsy techniques that are employed in pleural lesions diagnostics, including chest radiography, thoracic ultrasound, computed tomography, F-fluorodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, percutaneous, and thoracoscopic pleural biopsies with reference to their strengths, limitations, and clinical use. The review asserts also the available literature regarding monitoring algorithms.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite the recent advances in the field, there are several key areas for improvement, including the development and validation of minimal invasive methods and tools for risk stratification, the integration of multi-omics technologies, the implementation of standardized, evidence-based diagnostic and monitoring guidelines and increased focus on research and patient-centric approaches. The broad establishment of dedicated pleural clinics may significantly assist toward this direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2375421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pleural lesions may have heterogeneous presentation and causes. In recent years, there have been significant advances in pleural lesions diagnostics. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art, and recent updates for diagnostic modalities and monitoring regimes for pleural lesions.

Areas covered: A literature search was conducted through PubMed and Web of Science for relevant articles published from 1 January 2000- 1 March 2023. This article critically appraises the radiological modalities and biopsy techniques that are employed in pleural lesions diagnostics, including chest radiography, thoracic ultrasound, computed tomography, F-fluorodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, percutaneous, and thoracoscopic pleural biopsies with reference to their strengths, limitations, and clinical use. The review asserts also the available literature regarding monitoring algorithms.

Expert opinion: Despite the recent advances in the field, there are several key areas for improvement, including the development and validation of minimal invasive methods and tools for risk stratification, the integration of multi-omics technologies, the implementation of standardized, evidence-based diagnostic and monitoring guidelines and increased focus on research and patient-centric approaches. The broad establishment of dedicated pleural clinics may significantly assist toward this direction.

胸膜病变诊断和随访的进展:范围综述。
引言胸膜病变的表现和病因多种多样。近年来,胸膜病变诊断取得了重大进展。本综述旨在概述胸膜病变诊断方法和监测方案的最新进展:通过 PubMed 和 Web of Science 对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 1 日期间发表的相关文章进行了文献检索。文章对胸膜病变诊断中采用的放射模式和活检技术进行了批判性评估,包括胸部放射摄影、胸部超声、计算机断层扫描、氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描、磁共振成像、经皮和胸腔镜胸膜活检,并参考了它们的优势、局限性和临床应用。该综述还对有关监测算法的现有文献进行了论证:尽管该领域最近取得了一些进展,但仍有几个关键领域需要改进,包括开发和验证用于风险分层的微创方法和工具、整合多组学技术、实施标准化循证诊断和监测指南,以及更加注重研究和以患者为中心的方法。广泛建立专门的胸膜门诊可大大有助于实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信