Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage according to the Robson classification in a low-risk maternity hospital.

Amanda Botelho, Adriana Luckow Invitti, Rosiane Mattar, David Baptista da Silva Pares, Camilla Parente Salmeron, João Victor Jacomele Caldas, Nathalia Mello, Alberto Borges Peixoto, Edward Araujo Júnior, Sue Yazaki Sun
{"title":"Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage according to the Robson classification in a low-risk maternity hospital.","authors":"Amanda Botelho, Adriana Luckow Invitti, Rosiane Mattar, David Baptista da Silva Pares, Camilla Parente Salmeron, João Victor Jacomele Caldas, Nathalia Mello, Alberto Borges Peixoto, Edward Araujo Júnior, Sue Yazaki Sun","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) according to the Robson Classification in a low-risk maternity hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted retrospective cohort study by analyzing the medical records of pregnant women attended in a low-risk maternity hospital, during from November 2019 to November 2021. Variables analyzed were: maternal age, type of delivery, birth weight, parity, Robson Classification, and causes of PPH. We compared the occurrence of PPH between pregnant women with spontaneous (Groups 1 and 3) and with induction of labor (2a and 4a). Chi-square and Student t-tests were performed. Variables were compared using binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11,935 deliveries during the study period. According to Robson's Classification, 48.2% were classified as 1 and 3 (Group I: 5,750/11,935) and 26.1% as 2a and 4a (Group II: 3,124/11,935). Group II had higher prevalence of PPH than Group I (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p=0.028). Labor induction increased the occurrence of PPH by 18.8% (RR: 1.188, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, p=0.030). Model including forceps delivery [x<sup>2</sup>(3)=10.6, OR: 7.26, 95%CI: 3.32-15.84, R<sup>2</sup> Nagelkerke: 0.011, p<0.001] and birth weight [x<sup>2</sup>(4)=59.0, OR: 1.001, 95%CI:1.001-1.001, R<sup>2</sup> Nagelkerke: 0.033, p<0.001] was the best for predicting PPH in patients classified as Robson 1, 3, 2a, and 4a. Birth weight was poor predictor of PPH (area under ROC curve: 0.612, p<0.001, 95%CI: 0.572-0.653).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robson Classification 2a and 4a showed the highest rates of postpartum hemorrhage. The model including forceps delivery and birth weight was the best predictor for postpartum hemorrhage in Robson Classification 1, 3, 2a, and 4a.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) according to the Robson Classification in a low-risk maternity hospital.

Methods: We conducted retrospective cohort study by analyzing the medical records of pregnant women attended in a low-risk maternity hospital, during from November 2019 to November 2021. Variables analyzed were: maternal age, type of delivery, birth weight, parity, Robson Classification, and causes of PPH. We compared the occurrence of PPH between pregnant women with spontaneous (Groups 1 and 3) and with induction of labor (2a and 4a). Chi-square and Student t-tests were performed. Variables were compared using binary logistic regression.

Results: There were 11,935 deliveries during the study period. According to Robson's Classification, 48.2% were classified as 1 and 3 (Group I: 5,750/11,935) and 26.1% as 2a and 4a (Group II: 3,124/11,935). Group II had higher prevalence of PPH than Group I (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p=0.028). Labor induction increased the occurrence of PPH by 18.8% (RR: 1.188, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, p=0.030). Model including forceps delivery [x2(3)=10.6, OR: 7.26, 95%CI: 3.32-15.84, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.011, p<0.001] and birth weight [x2(4)=59.0, OR: 1.001, 95%CI:1.001-1.001, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.033, p<0.001] was the best for predicting PPH in patients classified as Robson 1, 3, 2a, and 4a. Birth weight was poor predictor of PPH (area under ROC curve: 0.612, p<0.001, 95%CI: 0.572-0.653).

Conclusion: Robson Classification 2a and 4a showed the highest rates of postpartum hemorrhage. The model including forceps delivery and birth weight was the best predictor for postpartum hemorrhage in Robson Classification 1, 3, 2a, and 4a.

一家低风险产科医院根据罗布森分类法得出的产后出血风险因素。
目的:根据罗布森分类法评估低风险产科医院产后出血(PPH)的风险因素:根据罗布森分类法评估低风险产科医院产后出血(PPH)的风险因素:我们通过分析一家低风险妇产医院 2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 11 月期间就诊孕妇的病历,开展了一项回顾性队列研究。分析的变量包括:产妇年龄、分娩类型、出生体重、胎次、罗布森分类和 PPH 的原因。我们比较了自然分娩(第 1 组和第 3 组)和引产(第 2a 组和第 4a 组)孕妇的 PPH 发生率。进行了卡方检验和学生 t 检验。使用二元逻辑回归对变量进行比较:研究期间共有 11,935 例分娩。根据罗布森分类法,48.2%的产妇被分为 1 和 3 类(第一组:5 750/11 935 例),26.1%的产妇被分为 2a 和 4a 类(第二组:3 124/11 935 例)。第二组的 PPH 发生率高于第一组(3.5% 对 2.7%,P=0.028)。引产使 PPH 发生率增加了 18.8%(RR:1.188,95% CI:1.02-1.36,P=0.030)。包括产钳分娩的模型[x2(3)=10.6,OR:7.26,95%CI:3.32-15.84,R2 Nagelkerke:0.011,p2(4)=59.0,OR:1.001,95%CI:1.001-1.001,R2 Nagelkerke:0.033,p结论:罗布森分级 2a 和 4a 显示了最高的产后出血率。包括产钳助产和出生体重在内的模型是预测罗布森分级 1、3、2a 和 4a 产后出血的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信