Impact of D-dimer on in-hospital mortality following aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sashwath Srikanth, Shabnam Abrishami, Lakshmi Subramanian, Ashwini Mahadevaiah, Ankit Vyas, Akhil Jain, Sangeetha Nathaniel, Subramanian Gnanaguruparan, Rupak Desai
{"title":"Impact of D-dimer on in-hospital mortality following aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sashwath Srikanth, Shabnam Abrishami, Lakshmi Subramanian, Ashwini Mahadevaiah, Ankit Vyas, Akhil Jain, Sangeetha Nathaniel, Subramanian Gnanaguruparan, Rupak Desai","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of D-dimer (DD) as a biomarker for acute aortic dissection (AD) is recognized. Yet, its predictive value for in-hospital mortality remains uncertain and subject to conflicting evidence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis of AD-related in-hospital mortality (ADIM) with elevated DD levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for AD and ADIM literature through May 2022. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics and effect size (hazard or odds ratio) analysis with random-effects models. Sample size, study type, and patients' mean age were used for subgroup analysis. The significance threshold was <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (3628 patients) were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of ADIM was 20% (95%CI: 15%-25%). Despite comparable demographic characteristics and comorbidities, elevated DD values were associated with higher ADIM risk (unadjusted effect size: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.34-2.8; adjusted effect size: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Studies involving patients with a mean age of < 60 years exhibited an increased mortality risk (effect size: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.23-1.67, <i>P</i> < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in studies with a mean age > 60 years. Prospective and larger sample size studies (<i>n</i> > 250) demonstrated a heightened likelihood of ADIM associated with elevated DD levels (effect size: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.30-5.08, <i>P</i> < 0.01 <i>vs</i> effect size: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00-1.11, <i>P</i> = 0.05, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis shows elevated DD increases in-hospital mortality risk in AD patients, highlighting the need for larger, prospective studies to improve risk prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The utility of D-dimer (DD) as a biomarker for acute aortic dissection (AD) is recognized. Yet, its predictive value for in-hospital mortality remains uncertain and subject to conflicting evidence.

Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis of AD-related in-hospital mortality (ADIM) with elevated DD levels.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for AD and ADIM literature through May 2022. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics and effect size (hazard or odds ratio) analysis with random-effects models. Sample size, study type, and patients' mean age were used for subgroup analysis. The significance threshold was P < 0.05.

Results: Thirteen studies (3628 patients) were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of ADIM was 20% (95%CI: 15%-25%). Despite comparable demographic characteristics and comorbidities, elevated DD values were associated with higher ADIM risk (unadjusted effect size: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.34-2.8; adjusted effect size: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19, P < 0.01). Studies involving patients with a mean age of < 60 years exhibited an increased mortality risk (effect size: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.23-1.67, P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in studies with a mean age > 60 years. Prospective and larger sample size studies (n > 250) demonstrated a heightened likelihood of ADIM associated with elevated DD levels (effect size: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.30-5.08, P < 0.01 vs effect size: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00-1.11, P = 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis shows elevated DD increases in-hospital mortality risk in AD patients, highlighting the need for larger, prospective studies to improve risk prediction models.

D 二聚体对主动脉夹层术后院内死亡率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:D-二聚体(DD)作为急性主动脉夹层(AD)的生物标志物的作用已得到认可。目的:对DD水平升高导致的主动脉夹层相关院内死亡率(ADIM)进行荟萃分析:我们检索了PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Google Scholar上截至2022年5月的AD和ADIM文献。使用I 2统计量和随机效应模型的效应大小(危险度或几率比)分析评估异质性。样本量、研究类型和患者平均年龄用于亚组分析。显著性阈值为 P <0.05:我们的研究共纳入了 13 项研究(3628 名患者)。汇总的 ADIM 患病率为 20%(95%CI:15%-25%)。尽管人口统计学特征和合并症具有可比性,但DD值升高与较高的ADIM风险相关(未调整效应大小:1.94,95%CI:1.34-2.8;调整效应大小:1.12,95%CI:1.05-1.19,P < 0.01)。涉及平均年龄小于 60 岁患者的研究显示死亡率风险增加(效应大小:1.43,95%CI:1.23-1.67,P <0.01),而平均年龄大于 60 岁的研究未观察到显著差异。前瞻性研究和样本量较大的研究(n > 250)显示,DD水平升高会增加ADIM的发病几率(效应大小:2.57,95%CI:1.30-5.08,P < 0.01 vs效应大小:1.05,95%CI:1.00-1.11,P = 0.05):我们的荟萃分析表明,DD升高会增加AD患者的院内死亡风险,因此需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来改进风险预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信