Maximizing Access to Cell Biology for PEERS: Retracting the term minority in favor of a more inclusive lexicon.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Fernando Vonhoff, Dana-Lynn Ko'omoa-Lange, Jamaine S Davis, Christina M Termini, Michelle M Martínez-Montemayor
{"title":"Maximizing Access to Cell Biology for PEERS: Retracting the term minority in favor of a more inclusive lexicon.","authors":"Fernando Vonhoff, Dana-Lynn Ko'omoa-Lange, Jamaine S Davis, Christina M Termini, Michelle M Martínez-Montemayor","doi":"10.1091/mbc.E24-04-0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The word minority, when used incorrectly, is a condescending term that segregates, inaccurately represents groups as being smaller or less important, and fuels microaggressions. Scientific societies and other institutions have normalized using the word minority, or the \"M word,\" to refer to members of underrepresented groups in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The message put forth using the term minority often directly conflicts with the inclusive agenda these societies seek to enact. More inclusive acronyms such as PEER (Persons Excluded because of their Ethnicity or Race) have been created to more accurately reflect the active process of exclusion by institutions. Here, we detail the rationale behind the decision to eradicate the word minority from the name of a prominent committee within the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The ASCB Minority Affairs Committee changed its name to the Maximizing Access to Cell Biology for PEERS Committee. Herein, we emphasize the basis for the name change and highlight the contradictions intrinsic to the word minority in this context. We highlight why swift action is required for this rewording within the context of a committee dedicated to supporting the inclusion of PEERs in the scientific community.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E24-04-0156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The word minority, when used incorrectly, is a condescending term that segregates, inaccurately represents groups as being smaller or less important, and fuels microaggressions. Scientific societies and other institutions have normalized using the word minority, or the "M word," to refer to members of underrepresented groups in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The message put forth using the term minority often directly conflicts with the inclusive agenda these societies seek to enact. More inclusive acronyms such as PEER (Persons Excluded because of their Ethnicity or Race) have been created to more accurately reflect the active process of exclusion by institutions. Here, we detail the rationale behind the decision to eradicate the word minority from the name of a prominent committee within the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The ASCB Minority Affairs Committee changed its name to the Maximizing Access to Cell Biology for PEERS Committee. Herein, we emphasize the basis for the name change and highlight the contradictions intrinsic to the word minority in this context. We highlight why swift action is required for this rewording within the context of a committee dedicated to supporting the inclusion of PEERs in the scientific community.

最大限度地为 PEERS 提供细胞生物学知识:收回 "少数群体 "一词,使用更具包容性的词汇。
少数群体一词,如果使用不当,就是一个居高临下的词语,会造成隔离,不准确地代表较小或较不重要的群体,并助长微观诽谤。科学协会和其他机构已经将使用少数群体一词或 "M 词 "来指代科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域代表性不足的群体成员正常化。使用 "少数群体 "一词所传达的信息往往与这些学会试图制定的包容性议程直接冲突。一些更具包容性的缩写词,如 PEER(因民族或种族而被排斥者),已经被创造出来,以更准确地反映各机构主动排斥的过程。在此,我们将详细介绍美国细胞生物学会(ASCB)决定将少数群体一词从一个著名的委员会名称中删除的理由。ASCB 少数群体事务委员会更名为 "最大化 PEERS 进入细胞生物学委员会"(Maximizing Access to Cell Biology for PEERS Committee)。在此,我们强调更名的依据,并着重指出少数群体一词在此语境中的内在矛盾。我们强调为什么需要在一个致力于支持将 PEER 纳入科学界的委员会的背景下,迅速采取行动进行这一重新措辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信