Disparities in glaucoma and macular degeneration healthcare utilization among persons living with dementia in the United States.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ali G Hamedani, Angela Y Chang, Yineng Chen, Brian L VanderBeek
{"title":"Disparities in glaucoma and macular degeneration healthcare utilization among persons living with dementia in the United States.","authors":"Ali G Hamedani, Angela Y Chang, Yineng Chen, Brian L VanderBeek","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06573-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dementia is common among patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study compares visit frequency, diagnostic test utilization, and treatment patterns for POAG and nAMD among persons with vs. without dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optum's de-identified Clinformatics<sup>®</sup> Data Mart Database (January 1, 2000-June 30, 2022) was used for this study. Two cohorts were created from newly diagnosed POAG or nAMD patients. Within each cohort, an exposure cohort was created of newly diagnosed dementia patients. The primary outcome was the number of visits to an eye care provider. Secondary analyses for the POAG cohort assessed the number of visual field tests, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and glaucoma medication prescription coverage. The secondary analysis for the nAMD cohort included the number of injections performed. Poisson regression was used to determine the relative rates of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POAG patients with dementia had reduced rates of eye care visits (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75-0.77), lower rates of testing utilization for visual fields (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.68) and OCT (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.64-0.69), and a lower rate of glaucoma prescription medication coverage (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.83-0.83). nAMD patients with dementia had reduced rates of eye care visits (RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70-0.79) and received fewer intravitreal injections (RR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.58-0.69) than those without dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POAG and nAMD patients with dementia obtained less eye care and less monitoring and treatment of their disease. These findings suggest that this population may be vulnerable to gaps in ophthalmic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"3947-3955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06573-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Dementia is common among patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study compares visit frequency, diagnostic test utilization, and treatment patterns for POAG and nAMD among persons with vs. without dementia.

Methods: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (January 1, 2000-June 30, 2022) was used for this study. Two cohorts were created from newly diagnosed POAG or nAMD patients. Within each cohort, an exposure cohort was created of newly diagnosed dementia patients. The primary outcome was the number of visits to an eye care provider. Secondary analyses for the POAG cohort assessed the number of visual field tests, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and glaucoma medication prescription coverage. The secondary analysis for the nAMD cohort included the number of injections performed. Poisson regression was used to determine the relative rates of outcomes.

Results: POAG patients with dementia had reduced rates of eye care visits (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75-0.77), lower rates of testing utilization for visual fields (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.68) and OCT (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.64-0.69), and a lower rate of glaucoma prescription medication coverage (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.83-0.83). nAMD patients with dementia had reduced rates of eye care visits (RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70-0.79) and received fewer intravitreal injections (RR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.58-0.69) than those without dementia.

Conclusions: POAG and nAMD patients with dementia obtained less eye care and less monitoring and treatment of their disease. These findings suggest that this population may be vulnerable to gaps in ophthalmic care.

Abstract Image

美国痴呆症患者在青光眼和黄斑变性医疗保健利用方面的差异。
目的:痴呆症在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和新生血管性老年黄斑变性(nAMD)患者中很常见。本研究比较了痴呆症患者与非痴呆症患者在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和新生血管性老年黄斑变性(nAMD)方面的就诊频率、诊断测试使用情况和治疗模式:本研究使用 Optum 的去标识 Clinformatics® Data Mart 数据库(2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)。从新确诊的 POAG 或 nAMD 患者中创建了两个队列。在每个队列中,还创建了一个新诊断痴呆症患者的暴露队列。主要结果是看眼科医生的次数。POAG 队列的次要分析评估了视野测试次数、光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 和青光眼药物处方覆盖率。nAMD 队列的二次分析包括注射次数。采用泊松回归法确定结果的相对发生率:结果:患有痴呆症的 POAG 患者的眼科就诊率较低(RR 0.76,95% CI:0.75-0.77),视野检测使用率较低(RR 0.66,95% CI:0.63-0.68),OCT 检测使用率较低(RR 0.67,95% CI:0.64-0.69),青光眼处方药覆盖率较低(RR 0.与无痴呆症患者相比,痴呆症 nAMD 患者的眼科就诊率降低(RR 0.74,95% CI:0.70-0.79),接受玻璃体内注射的次数减少(RR 0.64,95% CI:0.58-0.69):结论:患有痴呆症的 POAG 和 nAMD 患者获得的眼科护理较少,对其疾病的监测和治疗也较少。结论:患有痴呆症的 POAG 和 nAMD 患者获得的眼科护理较少,对其疾病的监测和治疗也较少。这些发现表明,这一人群可能很容易受到眼科护理缺口的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信