Radiofrequency-Induced Heating of Amalgam Restorations and Dental Implants during 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-04-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i15.15393
Maryam Paknahad, Iman Khaleghi, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
{"title":"Radiofrequency-Induced Heating of Amalgam Restorations and Dental Implants during 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Maryam Paknahad, Iman Khaleghi, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i15.15393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate radiofrequency-induced heating of different amalgam restorations and dental implants during 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Standardized class I cavities (5 mm long, 3 mm wide, and 3 mm deep) were prepared on the occlusal surface of 45 extracted human third molars. The samples were restored by three different types of amalgam including Cinalux amalgam (non-gamma-2, spherical), GS-80 (non-gamma-2, admix), and GK-110 amalgam (non-gamma-2, admix in silver). As a separate intervention group (G4), five titanium mini drive-lock implants with 2mm diameter and 10mm length were also selected and mounted to the base of the Eppendorf tube with 3mm of the implants extending above the mounting putty. The box containing the specimens was placed parallel to the long axis of the standard head and neck coil of the MRI device (64MHz radio-frequency energy with 25kW amplifier, 1.5T). Temperature fluctuations of the metallic materials in each group were monitored during MRI scans using a calibrated thermometer. One-way ANOVA was used to compare temperature changes among the amalgam groups (P<0.05). <b>Results:</b> Temperature elevations ranged from 0.21°C to 0.70°C in amalgam restorations and from 0.35 to 0.47°C in dental implants. The temperature changes among the three amalgam agents were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusion:</b> According to our findings, the radiofrequency-induced heating of amalgam restorations and dental implants during MRI examination can be considered within acceptable ranges. Therefore, amalgam restorations and dental implants can be categorized as \"MR safe\" in terms of radiofrequency-induced heating during 1.5 T MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i15.15393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate radiofrequency-induced heating of different amalgam restorations and dental implants during 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Standardized class I cavities (5 mm long, 3 mm wide, and 3 mm deep) were prepared on the occlusal surface of 45 extracted human third molars. The samples were restored by three different types of amalgam including Cinalux amalgam (non-gamma-2, spherical), GS-80 (non-gamma-2, admix), and GK-110 amalgam (non-gamma-2, admix in silver). As a separate intervention group (G4), five titanium mini drive-lock implants with 2mm diameter and 10mm length were also selected and mounted to the base of the Eppendorf tube with 3mm of the implants extending above the mounting putty. The box containing the specimens was placed parallel to the long axis of the standard head and neck coil of the MRI device (64MHz radio-frequency energy with 25kW amplifier, 1.5T). Temperature fluctuations of the metallic materials in each group were monitored during MRI scans using a calibrated thermometer. One-way ANOVA was used to compare temperature changes among the amalgam groups (P<0.05). Results: Temperature elevations ranged from 0.21°C to 0.70°C in amalgam restorations and from 0.35 to 0.47°C in dental implants. The temperature changes among the three amalgam agents were not statistically significant. Conclusion: According to our findings, the radiofrequency-induced heating of amalgam restorations and dental implants during MRI examination can be considered within acceptable ranges. Therefore, amalgam restorations and dental implants can be categorized as "MR safe" in terms of radiofrequency-induced heating during 1.5 T MRI.

1.5T 磁共振成像中汞合金修复体和牙种植体的射频感应加热。
研究目的本研究旨在评估 1.5T 磁共振成像(MRI)中不同汞合金修复体和牙种植体的射频诱导加热情况。材料和方法:在 45 颗拔出的人类第三磨牙的咬合面上制备标准化的 I 类龋洞(长 5 毫米、宽 3 毫米、深 3 毫米)。样品由三种不同类型的汞合金修复,包括 Cinalux 汞合金(非伽马-2,球形)、GS-80(非伽马-2,混合)和 GK-110 汞合金(非伽马-2,银混合)。作为单独的干预组(G4),还选择了 5 个直径为 2 毫米、长度为 10 毫米的微型钛驱动锁种植体,并将其安装在 Eppendorf 管的底部,种植体的 3 毫米部分伸出安装腻子。装有试样的盒子平行于核磁共振成像设备(64MHz 射频能量,25kW 放大器,1.5T)标准头颈线圈的长轴。在磁共振成像扫描期间,使用校准温度计监测每组金属材料的温度波动。使用单因素方差分析比较了各汞合金组的温度变化(结果:温度升高的范围为 0.21-0.25℃):汞合金修复体的温度升高了 0.21°C 至 0.70°C,牙科植入体的温度升高了 0.35°C 至 0.47°C。三种汞合金制剂之间的温度变化没有统计学意义。结论:根据我们的研究结果,在磁共振成像检查过程中,汞合金修复体和牙科种植体的射频感应加热可被视为在可接受的范围内。因此,就 1.5 T 磁共振成像中射频引起的加热而言,汞合金修复体和牙齿种植体可归类为 "磁共振安全"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信