Two aspects of feed-forward control of action stability: effects of action speed and unexpected events.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06892-x
Sayan Deep De, Satyajit Ambike, Mark L Latash
{"title":"Two aspects of feed-forward control of action stability: effects of action speed and unexpected events.","authors":"Sayan Deep De, Satyajit Ambike, Mark L Latash","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06892-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We explored two types of anticipatory synergy adjustments (ASA) during accurate four-finger total force production task. The first type is a change in the index of force-stabilizing synergy during a steady state when a person is expecting a signal to produce a quick force change, which is seen even when the signal does not come (steady-state ASA). The other type is the drop in in the synergy index prior to a planned force change starting at a known time (transient ASA). The subjects performed a task of steady force production at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) followed by a ramp to 20% MVC over 1 s, 3 s, and as a step function (0 s). In another task, in 50% of the trials during the steady-state phase, an unexpected signal could come requiring a quick force pulse to 20% MVC (0-surprise). Inter-trial variance in the finger force space was used to quantify the index of force-stabilizing synergy within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. We observed significantly lower synergy index values during the steady state in the 0-ramp trials compared to the 1-ramp and 3-ramp trials. There was also larger transient ASA during the 0-ramp trials. In the 0-surprise condition, the synergy index was significantly higher compared to the 0-ramp condition whereas the transient ASA was significantly larger. The finding of transient ASA scaling is of importance for clinical studies, which commonly involve populations with slower actions, which can by itself be associated with smaller ASAs. The participants varied the sharing pattern of total force across the fingers more in the task with \"surprises\". This was coupled to more attention to precision of performance, i.e., inter-trial deviations from the target as reflected in smaller variance affecting total force, possibly reflecting higher concentration on the task, which the participants perceived as more challenging compared to a similar task without surprise targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2177-2191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06892-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explored two types of anticipatory synergy adjustments (ASA) during accurate four-finger total force production task. The first type is a change in the index of force-stabilizing synergy during a steady state when a person is expecting a signal to produce a quick force change, which is seen even when the signal does not come (steady-state ASA). The other type is the drop in in the synergy index prior to a planned force change starting at a known time (transient ASA). The subjects performed a task of steady force production at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) followed by a ramp to 20% MVC over 1 s, 3 s, and as a step function (0 s). In another task, in 50% of the trials during the steady-state phase, an unexpected signal could come requiring a quick force pulse to 20% MVC (0-surprise). Inter-trial variance in the finger force space was used to quantify the index of force-stabilizing synergy within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. We observed significantly lower synergy index values during the steady state in the 0-ramp trials compared to the 1-ramp and 3-ramp trials. There was also larger transient ASA during the 0-ramp trials. In the 0-surprise condition, the synergy index was significantly higher compared to the 0-ramp condition whereas the transient ASA was significantly larger. The finding of transient ASA scaling is of importance for clinical studies, which commonly involve populations with slower actions, which can by itself be associated with smaller ASAs. The participants varied the sharing pattern of total force across the fingers more in the task with "surprises". This was coupled to more attention to precision of performance, i.e., inter-trial deviations from the target as reflected in smaller variance affecting total force, possibly reflecting higher concentration on the task, which the participants perceived as more challenging compared to a similar task without surprise targets.

Abstract Image

行动稳定性的前馈控制的两个方面:行动速度和意外事件的影响。
我们在精确的四指总用力任务中探索了两种类型的预期协同调整(ASA)。第一种类型是在稳定状态下,当一个人期待一个信号以产生快速的力的变化时,力的稳定协同指数会发生变化,即使信号没有出现,这种变化也会出现(稳态 ASA)。另一种类型是在已知时间开始计划的力量变化之前,协同指数下降(瞬时 ASA)。受试者在完成一项任务时,先以最大自主收缩力(MVC)的 10%稳定发力,然后在 1 秒、3 秒和阶跃函数(0 秒)的时间内斜坡上升至 MVC 的 20%。在另一项任务中,在稳态阶段的 50%试验中,可能会出现意外信号,需要快速发力脉冲至 20% MVC(0-惊喜)。在不受控制的流形假设中,手指力量空间的试验间差异被用来量化力量稳定协同指数。我们观察到,与 1 斜道和 3 斜道试验相比,0 斜道试验中稳定状态下的协同指数值明显较低。在 0 斜坡试验中,瞬态 ASA 也更大。在 "0-惊喜 "条件下,协同指数明显高于 "0-斜坡 "条件,而瞬时 ASA 则明显大于 "0-斜坡 "条件。瞬时 ASA 缩放的发现对临床研究具有重要意义,因为临床研究通常涉及行动较慢的人群,而行动较慢的人群本身就可能与较小的 ASA 有关。在有 "惊喜 "的任务中,参与者在手指间的总力量共享模式变化更大。这可能反映出,与没有意外目标的类似任务相比,参与者认为这项任务更具挑战性,因此在完成任务时注意力更加集中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信