Intraindividual comparison of CT and MRI for predicting vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10944-9
Junhan Pan, Huizhen Huang, Siying Zhang, Yanyan Zhu, Yuhao Zhang, Meng Wang, Cong Zhang, Yan-Ci Zhao, Feng Chen
{"title":"Intraindividual comparison of CT and MRI for predicting vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Junhan Pan, Huizhen Huang, Siying Zhang, Yanyan Zhu, Yuhao Zhang, Meng Wang, Cong Zhang, Yan-Ci Zhao, Feng Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10944-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish and validate scoring models for predicting vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to intra-individually compare the predictive performance between the two modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 324 patients with surgically confirmed HCC who underwent preoperative dynamic CT and MRI with extracellular contrast agent between June 2019 and August 2020. These patients were then divided into a discovery cohort (n = 227) and a validation cohort (n = 97). Imaging features and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories of VETC-positive HCCs were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted on the discovery cohort to identify clinical and imaging predictors associated with VETC-positive cases. Subsequently, separate CT-based and MRI-based scoring models were developed, and their diagnostic performance was compared using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On both CT and MRI, VETC-positive HCCs exhibited a higher frequency of size > 5.0 cm, necrosis or severe ischemia, non-smooth tumor margin, targetoid appearance, intratumor artery, and heterogeneous enhancement with septations or irregular ring-like structure compared to VETC-negative HCCs (all p < 0.05). Regarding LI-RADS categories, VETC-positive HCCs were more frequently categorized as LR-M than VETC-negative cases (all p < 0.05). In the validation cohort, the CT-based model showed similar sensitivity (76.7% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.375), specificity (83.6% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.180), and area under the curve value (0.80 vs. 0.81, p = 0.910) to the MRI-based model in predicting VETC-positive HCCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative CT and MRI demonstrated comparable performance in the identification of VETC-positive HCCs, thus displaying promising predictive capabilities.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated promise in preoperatively identifying the vessel-encapsulating tumor cluster pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma, with no statistically significant difference between the two modalities, potentially adding additional prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) show promise in the preoperative identification of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC with vessels encapsulating tumor cluster patterns were more frequently LR-M compared to those without. These CT and MRI models showed comparable ability in identifying vessels encapsulating tumor clusters-positive HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"61-72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10944-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To establish and validate scoring models for predicting vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to intra-individually compare the predictive performance between the two modalities.

Methods: We retrospectively included 324 patients with surgically confirmed HCC who underwent preoperative dynamic CT and MRI with extracellular contrast agent between June 2019 and August 2020. These patients were then divided into a discovery cohort (n = 227) and a validation cohort (n = 97). Imaging features and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories of VETC-positive HCCs were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted on the discovery cohort to identify clinical and imaging predictors associated with VETC-positive cases. Subsequently, separate CT-based and MRI-based scoring models were developed, and their diagnostic performance was compared using generalized estimating equations.

Results: On both CT and MRI, VETC-positive HCCs exhibited a higher frequency of size > 5.0 cm, necrosis or severe ischemia, non-smooth tumor margin, targetoid appearance, intratumor artery, and heterogeneous enhancement with septations or irregular ring-like structure compared to VETC-negative HCCs (all p < 0.05). Regarding LI-RADS categories, VETC-positive HCCs were more frequently categorized as LR-M than VETC-negative cases (all p < 0.05). In the validation cohort, the CT-based model showed similar sensitivity (76.7% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.375), specificity (83.6% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.180), and area under the curve value (0.80 vs. 0.81, p = 0.910) to the MRI-based model in predicting VETC-positive HCCs.

Conclusion: Preoperative CT and MRI demonstrated comparable performance in the identification of VETC-positive HCCs, thus displaying promising predictive capabilities.

Clinical relevance statement: Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated promise in preoperatively identifying the vessel-encapsulating tumor cluster pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma, with no statistically significant difference between the two modalities, potentially adding additional prognostic value.

Key points: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) show promise in the preoperative identification of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC with vessels encapsulating tumor cluster patterns were more frequently LR-M compared to those without. These CT and MRI models showed comparable ability in identifying vessels encapsulating tumor clusters-positive HCC.

Abstract Image

CT 和 MRI 在预测肝细胞癌中包裹肿瘤团块的血管方面的个体内比较。
研究目的建立并验证使用计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)预测肝细胞癌(HCC)血管包裹肿瘤簇(VETC)的评分模型,并在个体内部比较两种模式的预测性能:我们回顾性地纳入了 324 例经手术确诊的 HCC 患者,这些患者在 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 8 月期间接受了术前动态 CT 和细胞外造影剂 MRI 检查。然后将这些患者分为发现队列(n = 227)和验证队列(n = 97)。评估了VETC阳性HCC的成像特征和肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)类别。对发现队列进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与 VETC 阳性病例相关的临床和影像学预测因素。随后,分别建立了基于CT和MRI的评分模型,并使用广义估计方程比较了它们的诊断性能:在 CT 和 MRI 上,与 VETC 阴性的 HCC 相比,VETC 阳性的 HCC 出现以下情况的频率更高:体积大于 5.0 厘米、坏死或严重缺血、肿瘤边缘不光滑、靶样外观、瘤内动脉、带有隔膜或不规则环状结构的异质强化(均为 p 结论:VETC 阳性的 HCC 与 VETC 阴性的 HCC 相比,出现以下情况的频率更高:体积大于 5.0 厘米、坏死或严重缺血、肿瘤边缘不光滑、靶样外观、瘤内动脉、带有隔膜或不规则环状结构的异质强化:术前 CT 和 MRI 在识别 VETC 阳性 HCC 方面表现不相上下,因此显示出良好的预测能力:计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在术前识别肝细胞癌中的血管包裹性肿瘤簇模式方面都表现出了良好的前景,两种模式之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异,可能会增加额外的预后价值:计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)有望在术前识别血管包裹肿瘤簇阳性肝细胞癌(HCC)。与无血管包裹肿瘤簇模式的肝癌相比,有血管包裹肿瘤簇模式的肝癌更常见于LR-M。这些 CT 和 MRI 模型在识别包裹肿瘤簇阳性 HCC 的血管方面表现出了相当的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信