Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Gabriele Alessandro Novarria, Federica Vultaggio, Vittorio Saginario, Giovanni Felisati, Alberto Maria Saibene
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Gabriele Alessandro Novarria, Federica Vultaggio, Vittorio Saginario, Giovanni Felisati, Alberto Maria Saibene","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08825-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Middle turbinate (MT) surgery is extremely common during endoscopic sinus surgery procedures, though no agreement exists on which techniques provide the best outcomes. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aims to assess which MT surgery technique yields the least postoperative adverse effects and the best objective and subjective outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search criteria was conducted in multiple databases up to July 3, 2023, to identify studies reporting surgical treatments of the MT. After screening and quality assessment, 14 articles were included for analysis. Data on patients demographics, surgical approaches, postoperative treatment and follow-up, objective and subjective outcomes were extracted and reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 173 unique papers identified, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 9). Antero-inferior middle turbinectomy was the predominant surgical approach. Most studies evaluated results with postoperative endoscopy, a superior outcome was documented in the intervention group (ten out of eleven cases). In four out five studies using the SNOT-22, the treatment group was associated with a statistically significant improvement. Olfactory questionnaires highlighted superior olfactory outcome in two out of three studies. The UPSIT score revealed no significant difference between groups. Objective olfactory assessments favored treatment groups in both studies utilizing olfactometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It seems that a partial MT surgical approach consistently yields subjective and objective improvements compared to conservative measures, also suggesting a positive impact on smell function. Despite it appears that better outcomes with fewer complications are consistently achieved with partial techniques, it remains challenging identifying which partial technique surpasses the others, due to significant heterogeneity among the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"6187-6199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08825-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Middle turbinate (MT) surgery is extremely common during endoscopic sinus surgery procedures, though no agreement exists on which techniques provide the best outcomes. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aims to assess which MT surgery technique yields the least postoperative adverse effects and the best objective and subjective outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive search criteria was conducted in multiple databases up to July 3, 2023, to identify studies reporting surgical treatments of the MT. After screening and quality assessment, 14 articles were included for analysis. Data on patients demographics, surgical approaches, postoperative treatment and follow-up, objective and subjective outcomes were extracted and reviewed.

Results: Out of 173 unique papers identified, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 9). Antero-inferior middle turbinectomy was the predominant surgical approach. Most studies evaluated results with postoperative endoscopy, a superior outcome was documented in the intervention group (ten out of eleven cases). In four out five studies using the SNOT-22, the treatment group was associated with a statistically significant improvement. Olfactory questionnaires highlighted superior olfactory outcome in two out of three studies. The UPSIT score revealed no significant difference between groups. Objective olfactory assessments favored treatment groups in both studies utilizing olfactometry.

Conclusions: It seems that a partial MT surgical approach consistently yields subjective and objective improvements compared to conservative measures, also suggesting a positive impact on smell function. Despite it appears that better outcomes with fewer complications are consistently achieved with partial techniques, it remains challenging identifying which partial technique surpasses the others, due to significant heterogeneity among the studies.

Abstract Image

中鼻甲手术的有效性和安全性:系统性综述。
目的:中鼻甲(MT)手术在内窥镜鼻窦手术过程中极为常见,但对于哪种技术能提供最佳疗效,目前尚无一致意见。这项符合 PRISMA 标准的系统性综述旨在评估哪种中鼻甲手术技术能产生最少的术后不良反应以及最佳的客观和主观疗效:方法:在 2023 年 7 月 3 日前的多个数据库中进行了全面的检索,以确定报告 MT 手术治疗的研究。经过筛选和质量评估,共纳入 14 篇文章进行分析。研究人员提取并审查了有关患者人口统计学、手术方法、术后治疗和随访、客观和主观结果等方面的数据:在已识别的 173 篇论文中,有 14 篇符合纳入标准,主要是随机对照试验(9 篇)。前下中鼻甲切除术是最主要的手术方法。大多数研究对术后内窥镜检查结果进行了评估,干预组的结果更优(11 例中有 10 例)。在使用 SNOT-22 的五项研究中,有四项研究表明治疗组的疗效有显著的统计学改善。嗅觉问卷调查显示,在三项研究中,有两项研究显示治疗组的嗅觉效果更佳。UPSIT 评分显示治疗组之间没有明显差异。在两项利用嗅觉测量法进行的研究中,客观嗅觉评估结果均有利于治疗组:结论:与保守治疗相比,MT 部分手术方法在主观和客观方面似乎都有明显改善,这也表明它对嗅觉功能有积极影响。尽管部分技术的治疗效果更好,并发症更少,但由于研究之间存在明显的异质性,因此确定哪种部分技术更胜一筹仍是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信