Intake Characteristics as Predictors of Psychotherapy Outcome in a Practice Research Network in Argentina

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Manuel Meglio, Beatriz Gómez, Anna Babl, Fernando García, Andrés Roussos, Roberto Muiños
{"title":"Intake Characteristics as Predictors of Psychotherapy Outcome in a Practice Research Network in Argentina","authors":"Javier Fernández-Álvarez,&nbsp;Juan Martín Gómez Penedo,&nbsp;Manuel Meglio,&nbsp;Beatriz Gómez,&nbsp;Anna Babl,&nbsp;Fernando García,&nbsp;Andrés Roussos,&nbsp;Roberto Muiños","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01394-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are few studies exploring intake diagnostic characteristics as predictors of change in integrative naturalistic settings. The aim of this study is to explore baseline variables at the intake process and establish the predictive value of the individual trajectories of the patients. We recruited 259 patients undergoing an integrative psychotherapy network of psychotherapists from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Every therapist completed the intake form of each patient involved in the routine outcome monitoring. Thereafter step-wise regressions based on forward selection strategies were used, in order to identify meaningful baseline predictors of patients’ clinical evolution, derived from the intake process. The selected predictors were social support network, subjective distress, the initial measure of clinical distress, unemployment, sociocultural status and reactance. When including those six variables in a multilevel model, the results indicate that social support network, subjective distress, and the initial measure of clinical distress were significant predictors of the trajectories of OQ-30, whereas unemployment, sociocultural status and reactance were not significant. The results regarding social support network are in line with the literature, while results of socioeconomic status (unemployment and sociocultural level) move in an opposite direction in comparison to the available evidence. Moreover, the mental health findings (initial OQ-30 and subjective distress) confirm the contradictory body of literature produced in this domain. Finally, reactance seems to be a significant predictor in previous study in contradiction of our results. Overall, this endeavor constitutes important but preliminary evidence to enhance the production of bottom-up science within practice research networks in the global south.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01394-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few studies exploring intake diagnostic characteristics as predictors of change in integrative naturalistic settings. The aim of this study is to explore baseline variables at the intake process and establish the predictive value of the individual trajectories of the patients. We recruited 259 patients undergoing an integrative psychotherapy network of psychotherapists from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Every therapist completed the intake form of each patient involved in the routine outcome monitoring. Thereafter step-wise regressions based on forward selection strategies were used, in order to identify meaningful baseline predictors of patients’ clinical evolution, derived from the intake process. The selected predictors were social support network, subjective distress, the initial measure of clinical distress, unemployment, sociocultural status and reactance. When including those six variables in a multilevel model, the results indicate that social support network, subjective distress, and the initial measure of clinical distress were significant predictors of the trajectories of OQ-30, whereas unemployment, sociocultural status and reactance were not significant. The results regarding social support network are in line with the literature, while results of socioeconomic status (unemployment and sociocultural level) move in an opposite direction in comparison to the available evidence. Moreover, the mental health findings (initial OQ-30 and subjective distress) confirm the contradictory body of literature produced in this domain. Finally, reactance seems to be a significant predictor in previous study in contradiction of our results. Overall, this endeavor constitutes important but preliminary evidence to enhance the production of bottom-up science within practice research networks in the global south.

阿根廷实践研究网络中作为心理治疗结果预测因素的接收特征。
很少有研究将入院诊断特征作为综合自然环境中变化的预测因素。本研究旨在探索入院过程中的基线变量,并确定患者个人轨迹的预测价值。我们从阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的心理治疗师网络中招募了 259 名接受综合心理治疗的患者。每位治疗师都填写了每位患者的入院登记表,并参与了常规结果监测。之后,我们采用了基于前向选择策略的逐步回归法,以便从入院流程中找出对患者临床进展有意义的基线预测因子。选定的预测因素包括社会支持网络、主观痛苦、临床痛苦的初始测量、失业、社会文化状况和反应。当把这六个变量纳入多层次模型时,结果表明社会支持网络、主观痛苦和临床痛苦的初始测量值对 OQ-30 的轨迹具有显著的预测作用,而失业、社会文化状况和反应性则不显著。有关社会支持网络的结果与文献一致,而有关社会经济地位(失业和社会文化水平)的结果则与现有证据相反。此外,心理健康方面的研究结果(初始 OQ-30 和主观痛苦)证实了这一领域文献中的矛盾之处。最后,在以前的研究中,反应似乎是一个重要的预测因素,这与我们的研究结果相矛盾。总之,这项工作为在全球南部的实践研究网络中加强自下而上的科学研究提供了重要但初步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信